FY 1999 proposal 199800702
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
| Title | Type |
|---|---|
| 199800702 Narrative | Narrative |
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Grande Ronde Supplementation - O&M/M&E - Nez Perce Tribe Lostine |
| Proposal ID | 199800702 |
| Organization | Nez Perce Tribe (NPT) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
| Name | Becky Ashe |
| Mailing address | P.O. Box 365 Lapwai, ID 83540 |
| Phone / email | 2088437320 / [email protected] |
| Manager authorizing this project | |
| Review cycle | FY 1999 |
| Province / Subbasin | Lower Snake / Grande Ronde |
| Short description | Operate an adult weir/trap facility and a juvenile acclimation/ release facility on the Lostine River to facilitate the Grande Ronde Basin Endemic Spring Chinook Supplementation Program. |
| Target species | |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
| RPA |
|---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
| Year | Accomplishment |
|---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 1999 cost |
|---|---|---|
| Personnel | $149,960 | |
| Fringe | $33,715 | |
| Supplies | $12,550 | |
| Operating | $26,912 | |
| Capital | $33,482 | |
| Tag | $14,500 | |
| Travel | $27,624 | |
| Indirect | $79,381 | |
| Subcontractor | $4,000 | |
| $382,124 | ||
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 1999 cost | $382,124 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 1999 budget request | $382,124 |
| FY 1999 forecast from 1998 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints: Completion of NEPA, NPPC 3-step review process, Section 10 permit from NMFS, success of the captive broodstock element.
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Comment:
Criteria 1: Technical Criteria - Yes
Criteria 2: Objectives Criteria - Incomplete: Match Objectives (Section 4) to later description of objectives in Section 7. Describe methods specific to this project (Lostine element) and not for entire Grand Ronde Program. Clarify methods. Use other sections of proposal for background and history and program framework, if necessary. Define "Develop" (Section 4, Objective 2). Does it mean plan or build in FY99? Are redd counts part of this or other project?
Criteria 3: Milestones Criteria - Yes
Criteria 4: Resources Criteria - Incomplete Give some budget details - what does Capital and O&M represent?, Travel 27.6k?, Report 38k?
Comment:
Slight reduction from increased efficienciesISRP Review (ISRP 1998-1)
Grande Ronde NEOH - Inadequate as a set
Jun 18, 1998
Comment:
The time specified to do pre-project evaluation to establish a baseline appears inadequate. Using six fish from the same brood year bottlenecks the population; thus, the effort is unlikely to achieve the goals and objectives of the project. How long do they need to run this program to reach their intended results? Are they accelerating inbreeding depression? The proposal does not adequately describe a monitoring and evaluation program. This proposal also does not ensure that the activities will not be harmful to the wild stocks. This proposal is not well justified as a research or conservation tool.NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
expense
May 2005
| FY05 NPCC start of year: | FY06 NPCC staff preliminary: | FY06 NPCC July draft start of year: |
| $581,215 | $581,215 | $581,215 |
Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website