FY 2000 proposal 20533
Section 1. Administrative
Proposal title | Multi-Year Lower Snake River Mainstem Anadromous Fish Plan |
Proposal ID | 20533 |
Organization | Columbia Basin Fish & Wildlife Authority (CBFWA) |
Proposal contact person or principal investigator |
Name | Tom Giese |
Mailing address | 2501 SW First Ave., Suite 200 Portland, OR 97201 |
Phone / email | 5032290191 / [email protected] |
Manager authorizing this project | |
Review cycle | FY 2000 |
Province / Subbasin | Columbia Plateau / Snake Lower |
Short description | |
Target species | |
Project location
Latitude | Longitude | Description |
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Project ID | Title | Description |
9403400 |
Summer/fall chinook restoration. |
|
9204600 |
Monitoring |
|
9401004 |
Monitoring |
|
8611900 |
Monitoring |
|
8000200 |
Monitoring |
|
9801003 |
Juvenile fall chinook survival studies. |
|
9102800 |
Research & monitoring of fall chinook life histories. |
|
9801005 |
Development and operations of fall chinook several acclimation facilities. |
|
9801004 |
Rearing and migration of yearling fall chinook upstream of Lwr. Granite Dam |
|
9801003 |
M&E the spawning distribution of fall chinook. |
|
20533 |
MYP Snake River Mainstem Anadromous Fish Plan |
|
9102800 |
M&E of wild juvenile Snake River spring/summer chinook outmigration. |
|
9102900 |
Research & monitoring of fall chinook life histories. |
|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
Item | Note | FY 2000 cost |
Personnel |
|
$0 |
Fringe |
|
$0 |
Supplies |
|
$0 |
| $0 |
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2000 cost | $0 |
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
Total FY 2000 budget request | $0 |
FY 2000 forecast from 1999 | $0 |
% change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Recommendation:
NA - Umbrella Proposal
Date:
Jun 15, 1999
Comment:
Recommendation:
NA - Umbrella Proposal
Comments:
This is an umbrella proposal for 12 projects, all ongoing, which relate to monitoring of anadromous fish in the Lower Snake River system. This is a first attempt at preparing an umbrella proposal and it lacks necessary features.. More than a list of projects is required. Objectives related to the Fish and Wildlife Program should be stated and Tasks explicitly related to the Objectives should be identified. The overall strategy being followed by the component projects should be described and the method of their coordination should be given. The history of the projects should be summarized.
Recommendation:
Do Not Fund
Date:
Aug 20, 1999
Comment:
Recommendation:
Date:
Aug 20, 1999
Comment:
Technical Criteria 1: Met? yes - Programmatic Criteria 2: Met? NA - Inadequate
Milestone Criteria 3: Met? NA -
Resource Criteria 4: Met? NA -