FY 2000 proposal 198605000

Additional documents

TitleType
198605000 Narrative Narrative
198605000 Sponsor Response to the ISRP Response

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal titleWhite Sturgeon Mitigation and Restoration in the Columbia and Snake Rivers
Proposal ID198605000
OrganizationOregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
NameDavid Ward
Mailing address17330 SE Evelyn St. Clackamas, OR 97015
Phone / email5036572000 / [email protected]
Manager authorizing this project
Review cycleFY 2000
Province / SubbasinMainstem/Systemwide / Systemwide
Short descriptionRestore and mitigate for hydrosystem-caused loss of white sturgeon productivity through intensive fisheries management, supplementation, and modified hydrosystem operation. Assess success of mitigation efforts, and assess losses in unstudied areas.
Target speciesWhite Sturgeon
Project location
LatitudeLongitudeDescription
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agencyAction #BiOp AgencyDescription

Section 2. Past accomplishments

YearAccomplishment
1988 Developed methodologies: Habitat mapping and modeling; capture gears for various life stages; marking and aging techniques.
1992 Determined that dams limit movements of white sturgeon and have functionally isolated populations in mainstem Columbia River reservoirs.
1992 Described population dynamics and found them to be unique in each reservoir.
1992 Found population productivity to be 10-100 times higher downstream from Bonneville Dam than in Bonneville, The Dalles, or John Day reservoirs.
1992 Identified reduced flows and subsequent poor recruitment as the key factor limiting white sturgeon productivity in impoundments.
1992 Determined reservoirs provide large areas of suitable habitat for juvenile and adult white sturgeon, but compensatory population responses may reduce productivity if carrying capacity is exceeded.
1992 Determined over-fishing had occurred in the three lowermost reservoirs of the Columbia. Described appropriate exploitation rates under the reduced productivity resulting from the development and operation of the hydrosystem.
1997 Demonstrated increased abundance of white sturgeon in The Dalles and John Day reservoirs. Some of this recovery was attributable to intensive harvest management and reduced exploitation.
1997 Transplanted white sturgeon to The Dalles Reservoir and demonstrated survival and growth of those fish one and two years later.
1997 Completed initial population estimates for white sturgeon in Ice Harbor, Little Goose, and Lower Monumental reservoirs.
1997 Determined that white sturgeon larvae are susceptible to gas bubble trauma in laboratory experiments.
1998 Developed habitat maps and flow-habitat models for the Columbia River up to Priest Rapids Dam.
1998 Used index sampling to develop initial descriptions of white sturgeon populations in Rock Island Reservoir, Lake Rufus Woods, and Lake Roosevelt.
1998 Documented presence of species-specific viral pathogens in wild Columbia River white sturgeon.
1998 Developed two indices to index the relative abundance for age-0 white sturgeon.
1998 Determined that hydropeaking at The Dalles Dam displaces white sturgeon eggs and larvae from incubation areas

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project IDTitleDescription
8806400 Kootenai River White Sturgeon Studies and Conservation Aquaculture Complementary work to restore white sturgeon isolated outside the geographical bounds of project 8605000.
8806500 Kootenai River Fisheries Investigations Complementary work to study and restore white sturgeon isolated outside the geographical bounds of project 8605000.
9700900 Evaluate Means of Rebuilding White Sturgeon Populations in the Snake River Complementary work to study and restore white sturgeon outside the geographical bounds of project 8605000.
9093 Consumptive Sturgeon Fishery - Hells Canyon and Oxbow Reservoirs Complementary work to restore white sturgeon outside the geographical bounds of project 8605000.
9502700 Assess Limiting Factors of the Lake Roosevelt White Sturgeon Population Results from project 8605000 will guide restoration methods used by project 9502700.
9084 Assessing Genetic Variation Among Columbia Basin White Sturgeon Populations Genetic analyses from project 9084 will be used to guide supplementation and propagation developed by project 8605000.
9603201 Begin Implementation of Year 1 of the K-Pool Master Plan Program Propagation techniques developed as part of project 8605000 will be used by project 9603201.
9600800 PATH-Participation by State & Tribal Agencies
8810804 Streamnet: The Northwest Aquatic Information Network
9705909 Securing Wildlife Mitigation Sites in Oregon - Mitchell Point
9705911 Securing Wildlife Mitigation Sites in Oregon - Irrigon WMA Addition
9705904 Securing Wildlife Mitigation Sites in Oregon - Horn Butte
9705900 Securing Wildlife Mitigation Sites in Oregon
9079 Inventory Resident Fish in Bonneville, The Dalles, & John Day Reservoirs
9105 Determine if Salmon Are Successfully Spawning Below Lower Columbia Dams
8712700 Smolt Monitoring by Non-Federal Agencies
8201300 Coded Wire Tag Recovery Program
8906900 Annual Coded Wire Tag Program - Missing Production Oregon Hatcheries
9306000 Evaluate Columbia River Select Area Fisheries
20515 Mainstem Columbia River Umbrella Proposal
9007700 Northern Pikeminnow Management Program

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2000 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2000 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2000 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2000 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget
ItemNoteFY 2000 cost
Personnel ODFW = $187,789 WDFW = $228,900 USGS = $203,005 USFWS = $35,237 CRITFC = $83,946 $738,877
Fringe ODFW = $76,993 WDFW = $59,200 USGS = $60,901 USFWS = $8,780 CRITFC = $26,443 $232,317
Supplies ODFW = $14,160 WDFW =$4,300 USGS = $19,600 USFWS = $700 CRITFC = $3,400 $42,160
Operating ODFW = $46,645 WDFW = $26,700 USGS = $42,760 USFWS = $0 CRITFC = $7,542 $123,647
Travel ODFW = $28,803 WDFW = $36,300 USGS = $5,200 USFWS = $0 CRITFC = $6,250 $76,553
Indirect ODFW = $125,808 WDFW = $71,100 USGS = $125,957 USFWS = $15,293 CRITFC = $47,406 $385,564
Subcontractor Yakama Indian Nation (from CRITFC) $48,885
Subcontractor Abernathy Salmon Technology Center (from CRITFC) $125,641
Subcontractor Oregon State University (from ODFW) $100,517
Subcontractor NMFS (from ODFW) $45,000
$1,919,161
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2000 cost$1,919,161
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds$0
Total FY 2000 budget request$1,919,161
FY 2000 forecast from 1999$0
% change from forecast0.0%
Cost sharing
OrganizationItem or service providedAmountCash or in-kind
ODFW Personnel, office supplies $100,059 unknown
WDFW Personnel, vehicles, office supplies $187,660 unknown
USGS Personnel, field supplies, computer support $13,723 unknown
USFWS Personnel, travel $3,312 unknown
CRITFC $0 unknown
Other budget explanation

Schedule Constraints: If the project is funded, no substantial constraints are likely. Possible constraints include delays in NMFS consultations, and coordination of supplementation and propagation activities.


Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Jun 15, 1999

Comment:

Recommendation: Fund. Review in two years. At that time the proposers should have participated in writing an umbrella proposal for all the white sturgeon projects in the basin. Project leaders should develop a long-term strategy and should present a plan to show how they are cumulatively moving towards objectives. Project leaders should invite an independent scientific review and produce a peer-reviewed synthesis on the state of the science on Columbia River white sturgeon.

Comments: This is a component of a long-term (since 1986) project on population status, mitigation and restoration of white sturgeon stocks in the Basin, with focus on the lower mainstem reservoirs. It is part of the Umbrella project "Mainstem Columbia River Umbrella Proposal" and demonstrates significant collaborative effort, and clearly addresses the needs set out in the Fish and Wildlife program. The investigators have coordinated a logical sequence of projects that have addressed leading questions about the status and ecology of white sturgeon. They have been diligent in publishing their results in peer-review scientific literature. However, the cost is high and the ISRP's 1998 recommendation for an independent review of white sturgeon in the Basin has not occurred. Long-term goals and strategies are not clearly presented. The methods are presented in too general terms and because of this it is often not possible to evaluate the specifics of the approaches described. What they propose to do to meet objectives is clearly stated but details on experimental design and exactly how they are proposing to approach each task are lacking. Task 4b contains the type of detail that would have been useful in evaluating the other tasks .


Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Aug 20, 1999

Comment:


Recommendation:
Date:
Aug 20, 1999

Comment:

Screening Criteria: yes

Technical Criteria: yes

Programmatic Criteria: yes

Milestone Criteria: no- It was never intended to be a perpetual project, it doesn't have an overall framework, and there is no loss statement.


Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Mar 1, 2000

Comment:

[Decision made in 9-22-99 Council Meeting]
REVIEW:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
Funding category:
expense
Date:
May 2005
FY05 NPCC start of year:FY06 NPCC staff preliminary:FY06 NPCC July draft start of year:
$1,431,916 $1,251,853 $1,251,853

Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website