FY 2000 proposal 199107800
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
| Title | Type |
|---|---|
| 199107800 Narrative | Narrative |
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Burlington Bottoms Wildlife Mitigation |
| Proposal ID | 199107800 |
| Organization | Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
| Name | Sue Beilke |
| Mailing address | 18330 NW Sauvie Island Rd. Portland, OR 97231 |
| Phone / email | 5036213488 / [email protected] |
| Manager authorizing this project | |
| Review cycle | FY 2000 |
| Province / Subbasin | Lower Columbia / Willamette |
| Short description | The project would mitigate for hydro-electric facilities through protecting, maintaining, and enhancing wildlife habitat and related Habitat Units, benefitting target and other wildlife including Threatened, Endangered, and At-Risk species. |
| Target species | Great blue heron, Yellow Warbler, Beaver, Valley Quail, Spotted Sandpiper, Red-tailed Hawk, Black-capped Chickadee, Wood Duck |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
| RPA |
|---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
| Year | Accomplishment |
|---|---|
| 1993 | Completed habitat evaluation procedures (HEP). Completed hydrology and hydraulics assessment project. |
| 1994 | Completed EA/Management Plan, including NEPA work. |
| 1995 | Initiated survey and monitoring efforts for target and other wildlife species, including Federal and State listed species. Studies are on-going and will continue indefinitely with the assistance of volunteers. |
| 1996 | Maintained wildlife habitat values for target wildlife species through removal of invasive non-native plant species. |
| 1997 | Maintained and/or enhanced wildlife habitat values for target species through removal of non-native plant species and planting of native plant species. |
| 1998 | Maintained and/or enhanced wildlife habitat values for target species through non-native plant removal and planting of native plant species. |
| 1998 | Continued survey and monitoring efforts for target and other wildlife including one Federal listed (Bald Eagle) and three State listed (red-legged frog, western painted and pond turtles) species. |
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 9705900 | Securing Wildlife Mitigation Projects-Oregon | Proposal calls for enhancement and management of similar wetland habitats statewide. |
| 9705908 | Securing Wildlife Mitigation Sites-Oregon, Multnomah Channel | Adjacent project involving enhancement of similar wildlife habitats, involving coordination of management activities, etc.. Contributes to mitigation requirements for Willamette Basin. |
| 9705906 | Securing Wildlife Mitigation Projects-McKenzie River Islands | Acquisition and enhancment of similar wildlife habitat. Contributes to mitigation requirements for Willamette Basin. |
| 9205900 | Amazon Basin/Eugene Wetlands, Phase III | Enhancement of similar wildlife habitat. Contributes to mitigation requirements for Willamette Basin. |
| 9705907 | Securing Wildlife Mitigation Projects, EE Wilson WMA Additions | Enhancement of similar wildlife habitat. Contributes to mitigation requirements for Willamette Basin. |
| 9705916 | Securing Wildlife Mitigation Projects, Tualatin River Nat. Wildlife Refuge | Enhancement of similar wildlife habitat. Contributes to mitigation requirements for Willamette Basin. |
| 20550 | Willamette Basin Mitigation Program Umbrella | |
| 9206800 | Implement Willamette Basin Mitigation Program |
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 2000 cost |
|---|---|---|
| Personnel | Personnel costs for project manager and technician. | $35,110 |
| Fringe | Administrative costs for 2 temporary employees. | $9,478 |
| Supplies | Mailing supplies, copying, materials, native plants and grass seed. | $4,000 |
| Operating | Costs of field crews and tractor/mower rental for maintenance activities. | $10,000 |
| Capital | Costs of water control structure and related surveying, engineering, site prep., maintenance, etc. | $40,000 |
| Travel | Mileage reimbursement for personnel and volunteers. | $1,900 |
| Indirect | Overhead | $16,334 |
| $116,822 | ||
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 2000 cost | $116,822 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 2000 budget request | $116,822 |
| FY 2000 forecast from 1999 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ducks Unlimited | Engineering | $0 | unknown |
| Volunteers | Noxious weed control; assist with wildlife surveys. | $10,000 | unknown |
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints: Possible schedule constraints include: delays in obtaining necessary permits; delays in scheduling maintenance/enhancement work due to unavailability of field crews; and no access to a particular area during high water events.
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Comment:
Recommendation: Fund with high priority. The project is also recommended for a multi-year review cycle with comprehensive review for results in 5 years.Comments: A very good proposal, well justified and with clear relationships to other projects in the Willamette Basin. The reviewers particularly commend its inclusion of wildlife surveys to document and monitor site use by fish and wildlife, and for plant surveys that demonstrate that exotics diminish and native plant species flourish when water levels more closely resemble historic levels. The budget is adequately justified, notably the need for an increase over previous estimates, in order to construct a water-control structure.
Specific questions and comments that should also be addressed are: A small table of data would be helpful in the section relating to plant surveys and the effects of maintaining historic water levels. Similarly, a table of data showing results of wildlife surveys also would be a welcome contribution. Discussion of the value of the site to fish species could be expanded and improved. Reviewers express some concern that removal of non-native species may require annual funding in perpetuity.
Project history is well presented, but little is said about the results of surveys. Were expectations for habitat modifications met? Were there errors that led to 'adaptive management,' and if so, what modifications resulted to be applied to future work? The design of the proposed water control structure is unclear. Might it pose an obstruction to fish passage? What are the five wildlife species that are the targets of enhancement activities discussed in Objective No. 2 (Page 17)? How will water levels and flow be monitored under Objective No. 3a (Page 18), and with what frequency?
Comment:
Technically Sound? Yes
Aug 20, 1999
Comment:
Explain how this project fits into a watershed context.High expense for the benefit gained.
Proximity to high population areas may lessen wildlife values.
Comment:
Comment:
[Decision made in 9-22-99 Council Meeting]NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
expense
May 2005
| FY05 NPCC start of year: | FY06 NPCC staff preliminary: | FY06 NPCC July draft start of year: |
| $100,445 | $100,445 | $100,445 |
Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website