FY 2001 Ongoing proposal 198909803
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
| Title | Type |
|---|
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Evaluate Salmon Supplementation Studies in Idaho Rivers |
| Proposal ID | 198909803 |
| Organization | Shoshone-Bannock Tribes (SBT) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
| Name | Doug Taki |
| Mailing address | P.O. Box 306 Fort Hall, ID 83203 |
| Phone / email | 2082383914 / [email protected] |
| Manager authorizing this project | Doug Taki |
| Review cycle | FY 2001 Ongoing |
| Province / Subbasin | Mountain Snake / Salmon |
| Short description | Evaluate various supplementation strategies for maintaining and rebuilding spring/summer chinook populations in Idaho. Develop recommendations for the use of supplementation to rebuild naturally spawning populations. |
| Target species | |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
| RPA |
|---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
| Year | Accomplishment |
|---|---|
| 1991 | Identified study areas, brood stocks, facilities to be used. Begin preliminary baseline data collection on treatment and control streams, target stock history, genetic sampling. |
| 1992 | Initiated parr and smolt releases for treatment streams. Used existing hatchery brood stocks for first generation supplementation. Began monitoring of treatment and control streams. |
| 1996 | Completed small scale investigation to monitor behavioral interactions between natural and hatchery fish. Small scale investigation into chinook salmon supplementation strategies and techniques: 1992 -1994. Technical Reports. Peery, C.A. and T.C. Bjornn. |
| 1997 | First generation returns, a known brood stock for supplementation is established. Brood stock selection begins with local stocks of known origin. |
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Monitor and evaluate the effects of supplementation on parr, presmolt and smolt numbers and spawning escapements of naturally produced salmon. | Coordination and planning. | 8 | $4,994 | |
| 2. Monitor and evaluate changes in natural productivity and genetic composition of target and adjacent populations following supplementation. | Coordination and planning. | 8 | $4,994 | |
| 3. Determine which supplementation strategies (broodstock and release stage) provide the quickest and highest response in natural production without adverse effects on productivity. (Long Term) | Coordination and planning | 8 | $4,994 | |
| 4. Determine which supplementation strategies (brood stock and release stage) provide the quickest and highest response in natural production without adverse effects on productivity. (Long term) | Coordination and planning | 8 | $4,994 |
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
| FY 2004 | FY 2005 | FY 2002 | FY 2003 |
|---|---|---|---|
| $22,468 | $22,920 | $20,775 | $21,814 |
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Monitor and evaluate the effects of supplementation on parr, presmolt and smolt numbers and spawning escapements of naturally produced salmon. | b. PIT tag a minimum of 700 hatchery supplementation and general production fish released in or nearby study streams. Equipment upgrades and repairs. | 8 | $3,212 | |
| d. Estimate summer parr densities from snorkeling surveys. Equipment upgrades and repairs. | 8 | $3,262 | ||
| e. Pit tag a minimum of 700 naturally produced parr from each treatment and control stream to estimate smolt production and survival. Equipment upgrades and repairs. | 8 | $3,212 | ||
| f. Use existing screw traps to collect, mark (PIT tag), and enumerate emigrating fish. Equipment and repairs not covered under 1.b and 1.e. | 8 | $3,112 |
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
| FY 2004 | FY 2005 | FY 2002 | FY 2003 |
|---|---|---|---|
| $14,948 | $15,845 | $13,182 | $13,841 |
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Monitor and evaluate the effects of supplementation on parr, presmolt and smolt numbers and spawning escapements of naturally produced salmon. | a. Differentially mark all hatchery supplementation and general production fish released in or nearby study streams. Assist IDFG. | 8 | $2,575 | |
| b. PIT tag a minimum of 700 hatchery supplementation and general production fish released in or nearby study streams. | 8 | $20,258 | ||
| c. Release various life stages of chinook salmon. Determine fish numbers for each life stage based on existing natural production and natural rearing capacity. | 8 | $5,127 | ||
| d. Estimate summer parr densities from snorkeling surveys. | 8 | $23,375 | ||
| e. Pit tag a minimum of 700 naturally produced parr from each treatment and control stream to estimate smolt production and survival. | 8 | $20,258 | ||
| f. Use existing screw traps to collect, mark (PIT tag), and enumerate emigrating fish. Partially covered under 1.b and 1.e. | 8 | $42,220 | ||
| g. Compare natural production of supplemented populations to unsupplemented populations and baseline data. | 8 | $3,574 | ||
| 2. Monitor and evaluate changes in natural productivity and genetic composition of target and adjacent populations following supplementation. | a. Monitor productivity and genetic indices from supplemented populations and compare baseline and controls. | 8 | $4,152 | |
| b. Monitor straying of hatchery supplementation fish into adjacent and control streams by weirs and carcass surveys. | 8 | $5,602 | ||
| c. Determine spawner to recruitment relationship based on determined production and productivity indices (parr and smolt numbers, adult escapements, survival, eggs/spawner etc.). | 8 | $5,024 | ||
| d. Predict population viability based on spawner to recruitment relationship to determine of the population will maintain itself through time in the absence of additional supplementation. | 8 | $4,090 | ||
| 3. Determine which supplementation strategies (broodstock and release stage) provide the quickest and highest response in natural production without adverse effects on productivity. (Long Term) | a. Monitor and evaluate natural production (presmolt, smolt and adult numbers) and productivity (survival, life stage characteristics, pathogens, straying, genetic composition) of supplemented populations and compare to baseline and controls. | 8 | $19,090 | Yes |
| b. Use local broodstocks with known natural component from the target population during the second generation of supplementation. | 8 | $4,090 | ||
| c. Compare natural production and productivity indices of supplemented populations using existing hatchery broodstocks (first generation) to populations using locally developed broodstocks (second generation). | 8 | $4,090 | ||
| d. Compare natural production and productivity indices among supplemented populations using parr, fall presmolt and smolt release strategies. | 8 | $4,090 | ||
| 4. Determine which supplementation strategies (brood stock and release stage) provide the quickest and highest response in natural production without adverse effects on productivity. (Long term) | a. Guidelines and recommendations will be developed addressing risks and benefits of supplementation (augmentation and restoration) in general and specific supplementation strategies (broodstock and release stage). | 8 | $9,090 | |
| b. Use local brood stocks with known natural component from the target population during the second generation of supplementation. | 8 | $4,090 |
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
| FY 2004 | FY 2005 | FY 2002 | FY 2003 |
|---|---|---|---|
| $203,351 | $209,452 | $186,219 | $193,667 |
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 2001 cost |
|---|---|---|
| Personnel | $9,809 | |
| Fringe | 30% of salaries | $2,942 |
| Travel | vehicle mileage, per diem, lodging for meetings | $3,400 |
| Indirect | 30% of salaries and fringe | $3,825 |
| Personnel | $4,880 | |
| Fringe | 30% of salaries | $1,464 |
| Supplies | $4,550 | |
| Indirect | 30% of salaries and fringe | $1,904 |
| Personnel | $77,352 | |
| Fringe | 30% of salaries | $23,206 |
| Travel | vehicle mileage, per diem, trailer space rental | $24,070 |
| Indirect | 30% of salaries and fringe | $30,167 |
| PIT tags | # of tags: 2500 | $6,000 |
| Subcontractor | genetic analysis | $20,000 |
| $213,569 | ||
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 2001 cost | $213,569 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 2001 budget request | $213,569 |
| FY 2001 forecast from 2000 | $230,000 |
| % change from forecast | -7.1% |
Reason for change in estimated budget
Cost sharing of personnel within the Department
Reason for change in scope
no change in scope anticipated
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
REVIEW:
CBFWA Funding Recommendation
CBFWA Funding Recommendation
Recommendation:
Ongoing Funding: yes; New Funding: no
Ongoing Funding: yes; New Funding: no
Date:
Jul 14, 2000
Jul 14, 2000
Comment:
Cost sharing of personnel within the department reduced the budget slightly. There is no change in scope of work.Comment:
REVIEW:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
Funding category:
expense
expense
Date:
May 2005
May 2005
| FY05 NPCC start of year: | FY06 NPCC staff preliminary: | FY06 NPCC July draft start of year: |
| $240,767 | $240,767 | $240,767 |
Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website