Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Spokane Tribe of Indians Wildlife Mitigation Project |
| Proposal ID | 199106200 |
| Organization | Spokane Tribe of Indians (STOI) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator |
| Name | B.J. Kieffer |
| Mailing address | P.O. Box 100 Wellpinit, Wa. 99040 |
| Phone / email | 5092587055 / [email protected] |
| Manager authorizing this project | B.J. Kieffer |
| Review cycle | FY 2001 Ongoing |
| Province / Subbasin | Inter-Mountain / Lake Roosevelt |
| Short description | Mitigation and protection of lands purchased for partial mitigation on the Spokane Indian Reservation due to the construction and inundation of winter range habitat caused by Grand Coulee Dam. |
| Target species | |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
| Year | Accomplishment |
|---|
| 1993 |
STOI entered into the Washington Interim Agreement and secured funds to begin implementing mitigation measures |
| 1996 |
STOI received partial mitigation funds from BPA to begin implementing mitigation goals. |
| 1998 |
STOI Wildlife Program finalized last purchase of the partial mitigation funds, the Spokane Tribe also made a contributed 1/4 of funds to complete the 439.98 acre POLG parcel. The Total Acreage purchased from the partial mitigation funds was 1863.5. |
| 1999 |
Habitat Evaluation Procedures (HEP) were completed and Habitat Units were credited to BPA for the interim losses.
A total of 2870 HU's have been credited to BPA. western meadow lark (305), sharp-tailed grouse (125), |
|
yellow warbler (51), ruffed grouse (145), white-tailed deer (1697), and mule deer (533). |
|
The Habitat Enhancement Plan was completed and submitted to BPA for mitigation lands. |
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
| 1) Habitat Based Mitigation |
a) Procure funds for partial mitigation to purchase wildlife habitat lands |
4+ |
$1,500,000 |
|
|
b) purchase 1500 acres |
|
$0 |
|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
| FY 2004 | FY 2005 | FY 2002 | FY 2003 |
|---|
| $1,500,000 | $1,500,000 | $1,500,000 | $1,500,000 |
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
| 1) Interim Operations and Maintenance Funds |
a) Procure manpower to repair and maintain existing fences around lands |
99+ |
$21,606 |
|
|
a)Fence repair and maintenance until site specific management plans are completed. |
2+ |
$5,000 |
|
|
d) work with STOI IRMP ID Team BIA Forestry, BIA Fire Management, to assist in developing management plans |
1+ |
$0 |
|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
| FY 2004 | FY 2005 | FY 2002 | FY 2003 |
|---|
| $80,000 | $70,000 | $150,000 | $100,000 |
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
| 1) Monitoring and Evaluation |
a) once parcels are secured: implement HEP's for target species, to determine HU'S for partial mitigation |
99+ |
$1,000 |
|
|
b) complete evaluation reports |
|
$200 |
|
|
c) Develop Site Specific Management Plans |
|
$1,000 |
|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
| FY 2004 | FY 2005 | FY 2002 | FY 2003 |
|---|
| $3,500 | $25,000 | $5,000 | $3,500 |
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 2001 cost |
|---|
| Capital |
Secure funds for partial mitigation to purchase 1500 acres |
$1,500,000 |
| Personnel |
FTE: 1.5 |
$13,260 |
| Fringe |
18 % plus medical expenses |
$4,364 |
| Supplies |
Supplies needed to complete progress reports, some fencing supplies to maintain and repair fence. |
$5,000 |
| Indirect |
17.6% |
$3,982 |
| Supplies |
Supplies needed to complete reports to BPA |
$2,200 |
| $1,528,806 |
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 2001 cost | $1,528,806 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 2001 budget request | $1,528,806 |
| FY 2001 forecast from 2000 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Reason for change in estimated budget
% Change did not take when entered zero ( Please Remove this remark)
The Spokane Tribe did not receive any funding for this in 2000, during the project review process our project did not meet the standards set forth and ranked lower than those which were funded.
Reason for change in scope
There is no or ever will be a change in scope from the perspective of the Spokane Tribe. Our mitigation is based on wildlife habitat and will continue to b so in the future. We are acquiring lands to mitigate for the losses caused to us by the construction and inundation caused by Grand Coulee Dam.
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Recommendation:
Date:
Jul 14, 2000
Comment:
Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Sep 13, 2000
Comment:
Rationale: Budget increase inappropriate in this review. Project was not funded or reviewed in 2000. In current provincial review.
Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Sep 20, 2003
Comment:
Contract MOA not yet in place, appraisals done, could expend 2 Million for 04. 01-03 needs not met yet. Land acquisition, potential capital expense. CAPITAL
Recommendation:
Date:
Sep 20, 2003
Comment:
FY04 funding will cover needs identified in FY03 (not spent), while FY05 funding will cover needs identified in FY01 and FY02 (not spent).
REVIEW:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
Funding category:
capital
Date:
May 2005
| FY05 NPCC start of year: | FY06 NPCC staff preliminary: | FY06 NPCC July draft start of year: |
| $3,000,000 |
$3,000,000 |
$3,000,000 |
Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website