FY 2001 Ongoing proposal 199204000
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
Title | Type |
---|
Section 1. Administrative
Proposal title | Redfish Lake sockeye salmon captive broodstock rearing and research |
Proposal ID | 199204000 |
Organization | National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) |
Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
Name | Tom Flagg |
Mailing address | PO Box 130 Manchester, WA 98353 |
Phone / email | 2068427181 / [email protected] |
Manager authorizing this project | Dr. Robert Iwamoto |
Review cycle | FY 2001 Ongoing |
Province / Subbasin | Mountain Snake / Salmon |
Short description | Incubate and rear Redfish Lake sockeye salmon captive broodstocks. Provide pre-spawning adults, eyed eggs, and juveniles to aid recovery of this ESA-listed endangered stock in Idaho. |
Target species |
Project location
Latitude | Longitude | Description |
---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
RPA |
---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Year | Accomplishment |
---|---|
1992 | Initiated broodstocks. |
1993 | Continued broodstock rearing, refined rearing strategies. |
1994 | Spawned 1991-brood, produced 48,000 eyed eggs. |
1995 | Continued broodstock rearing. |
1996 | Spawned 1993-broods, produced 413,600 eyed eggs in additional to 80 adults released to spawn in Redfish Lake. |
1997 | Spawned 1993- and 1994-broods, produced 168,000 eyed eggs in addition to 40 adults released to spawn in Redfish Lake. |
1998 | Spawned 1994-brood, produced 47,000 eyed eggs. |
1999 | Spawned 1996-brood, produced 65,400 eyed eggs. |
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Project ID | Title | Description |
---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|---|---|---|---|
ESA-listed endangered Snake River sockeye salmon captive broodstock F1-F3 generation rearing. | Rear and spawn captive broodstock | FY92-05 and beyond | $560,000 |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
FY 2004 | FY 2005 | FY 2002 | FY 2003 |
---|---|---|---|
$648,300 | $680,600 | $588,000 | $617,400 |
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
Item | Note | FY 2001 cost |
---|---|---|
Personnel | FTE: 2.3 | $127,700 |
Fringe | $48,400 | |
Supplies | $183,500 | |
Travel | $8,800 | |
Indirect | $92,200 | |
Subcontractor | $99,400 | |
$560,000 |
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2001 cost | $560,000 |
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
Total FY 2001 budget request | $560,000 |
FY 2001 forecast from 2000 | $525,000 |
% change from forecast | 6.7% |
Reason for change in estimated budget
1) Inflation adjustments were not made in the FY2000 forecast, 2) cost of freshwater rearing facility lease is anticipated to increase.
Cost sharing
Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
---|
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
CBFWA Funding Recommendation
Ongoing Funding: yes; New Funding: no
Jul 14, 2000
Comment:
The increase in budget is due to inflation adjustments that were not made in the FY 2000 forecast and the cost of the freshwater rearing facility lease is anticipated to increase. There is no change in scope of work.Comment:
Rationale: Budget increase inappropriate in this review. Budget increase will depend on step reviewNW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
expense
May 2005
FY05 NPCC start of year: | FY06 NPCC staff preliminary: | FY06 NPCC July draft start of year: |
$737,242 | $980,000 | $980,000 |
Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website