FY 2001 Ongoing proposal 199303701
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
| Title | Type |
|---|
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Technical Assistance with Life Cycle Modeling |
| Proposal ID | 199303701 |
| Organization | Paulsen Environmental Research Ltd (PER Ltd) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
| Name | Charles M. Paulsen |
| Mailing address | 16016 SW Boones Ferry Rd #4 Lake Oswego, OR 97035 |
| Phone / email | 5036994115 / [email protected] |
| Manager authorizing this project | Jim Geiselman - BPA |
| Review cycle | FY 2001 Ongoing |
| Province / Subbasin | Systemwide / Systemwide |
| Short description | Assist BPA and other regional agencies in evaluation of how changes in hydro operation, climate, hatchery operations, habitat, and harvest may affect survival and recovery of ESA-listed salmonids. |
| Target species | |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
| RPA |
|---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
| Year | Accomplishment |
|---|---|
| 1998 | "Testing the Hypothesis that Extra Mortality of Wild Snake River Spring/Summer Chinook Varies with the Releases of Snake River Hatchery Fish," June, 1998 (with Richard Hinrichsen). |
| 1998 | Snake River Chinook Parr-Smolt Survival And Habitat Quality Indices. In Review, AFS Transactions |
| 1998 | "Weighting and sensitivity analysis difficulties with an unbalanced design ," with R. Hinrichsen |
| 1999 | PATH Experimental Management Design Report (Draft) |
| 2000 | Participation in critical reviews of PATH and CRI research products |
| 2000 | PATH Experimental Management Design Report (Final). Journal Article in prep. |
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Improve understanding of relationships between land use, habitat quality, and parr-smolt survival | 2 | $50,000 | Yes |
| 2 | Investigate use of life stage survival data for use in experimental management design, projecting effects of management actions, and monitoring compliance with performance standards | 1 | $50,000 | Yes |
| 3 | Improve understanding of NMFS analytical processes. Use life-stage survival data to assess how changes in survival affect probability of meeting life-cycle standards (spawning escapement, etc) | 2 | $50,000 | |
| 4 | Improve understanding of EDT, Framework process, etc. Assess relationship between EDT, CRI, and related modeling efforts. | 2 | $35,000 |
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
| FY 2004 | FY 2005 | FY 2002 | FY 2003 |
|---|---|---|---|
| $200,000 | $205,000 | $190,000 | $195,000 |
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 2001 cost |
|---|---|---|
| Personnel | FTE: 1 | $155,000 |
| Supplies | $4,000 | |
| Travel | $6,000 | |
| Subcontractor | $20,000 | |
| $185,000 | ||
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 2001 cost | $185,000 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 2001 budget request | $185,000 |
| FY 2001 forecast from 2000 | $185,000 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
CBFWA Funding Recommendation
Ongoing Funding: no; New Funding: no
Jul 14, 2000
Comment:
There is no change in scope of work or budget.The NWPPC has decided to stop funding PATH related projects. This is a PATH project and should not be funded to remain consistent with the Council recommendation for tribal, state and federal agency participation in PATH.
This project fails to inform critical management decisions. It should include such services as a part of other projects tied to specific tasks or products. This project should not be funded as part of the Fish and Wildlife Program since it is not subject to the same standards of the regional review process.
BPA Funding Recommendation
Combine into Technical Support Program
Sep 8, 2000
Comment:
BPA proposes combining many of the tasks associated with these projects into what is now referred to as the Technical Support Project. Funding for specific tasks would not be associated with a specific project in the Council's Direct Program. The Technical Support Project would provide analytical capabilities and analyses needed for fish mitigation and fish impact assessments required of BPA and other federal agencies for compliance with ESA, NEPA, the NW Power Act, and the Clean Water Act. It provides critical analyses needed for management decisions on both a real-time and planning horizon basis and an assessment of the implications of those decisions. Much of this work is currently both direct and indirect support for ESA Biological Assessments and Biological Opinion (BO) consultations, and compliance with multiple analytical, research, and monitoring RPAs of the BO. Parallel analytical work is performed to support our oversight, coordination, and implementation responsibilities for the regional Fish and Wildlife Program. Following is a list of Technical Support Project tasks that BPA believes may be required during FY01 and estimated costs.
| Task | ESTIMATED FY01 COST |
|---|---|
|
Participation, critical review, and coordination with NMFS CRI analyses |
$100,000 |
|
Participation, critical review and coordination with NPPC EDT analyses |
$50,000 |
|
Juvenile and adult fish passage modeling development, application, and data support |
$70,000 |
|
Conservation biology /extinction risk applications for recovery plans |
$50,000 |
|
Hydro measures assessments |
$50,000 |
|
Habitat measures and watershed assessments |
$150,000 |
|
Hatchery and harvest measures assessments |
$50,000 |
|
One-year and five-year Action Plan development and review |
$100,000 |
|
Research, Monitoring and Evaluation Plan development/evaluation |
$100,000 |
|
Management framework and performance measures development and application |
$50,000 |
|
BiOp consultation and review |
$50,000 |
|
Record of Decision development and review |
$50,000 |
|
Regional scientific forums/workgroups participation and coordination |
$50,000 |
|
Life-cycle modeling |
$50,000 |
|
Program integration and assessment of progress toward meeting mitigation and recovery goals |
$50,000 |
| TOTAL | $1,200,000 |
Comment:
Bonneville will fund any future contracts from technical support placeholder