Section 1. Administrative
Proposal title | Walla Walla River Juvenile and Adult Passage Improvements |
Proposal ID | 199601100 |
Organization | Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation (CTUIR) |
Proposal contact person or principal investigator |
Name | Gary A. James |
Mailing address | P.O. Box 638 Pendleton, OR 97801 |
Phone / email | 5412764109 / [email protected] |
Manager authorizing this project | Gary A. James |
Review cycle | FY 2001 Ongoing |
Province / Subbasin | Columbia Plateau / Walla Walla |
Short description | Provide safe passage for adult and juvenile salmonids in the Walla Walla Basin by constructing and maintaining fish passage facilities at irrigation diversion dams and canals. |
Target species | |
Project location
Latitude | Longitude | Description |
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Year | Accomplishment |
1997 |
Removed Marie Dorian Dam on Walla Walla River |
1998 |
Removed Maiden Dam on Touchet River |
1998 |
Constructed Burlingame Dam fish ladder on Walla Walla River |
1999 |
Constructed Burlingame fish screens and bypass on Walla Walla River |
1999 |
Designed Garden City/Lowden II screens and ditch consolidation - to be constructed in 2000/2001 |
1999 |
Preliminary design for Hofer Dam screens and adult fishway |
2000 |
Constructed Little Walla Walla River fish screens, trap, and fishway |
2000 |
Constructed Nursery Bridge Dam fish ladder on Walla Walla River |
2000 |
Constructed Smith-Nelson screens on Walla Walla River |
2000 |
Designed Milton Ditch consolidation - to be constructed in 2000/2001 |
2000 |
Completed feasibility study on additional passage needs in Walla Walla Basin |
2000 |
Contracted for Operation and Maintenance of BPA funded passage facilities |
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Project ID | Title | Description |
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
1. Provide safe passage at diversion structures for migrating juvenile and adult salmonids in the Walla Walla Basin |
a. Complete final design for juvenile screens and adult fishway at Hofer Dam diversion |
1 |
$252,000 |
Yes |
|
b. Do final planning and design for Bergevin-Williams diversion screens |
1 |
$141,000 |
Yes |
|
c. Do final planning and design for Old Lowden diversion screens |
1 |
$115,000 |
Yes |
|
d. Do final design and planning for Titus Creek screens |
1 |
$60,000 |
Yes |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
2. Provide safe passage at diversion structures for migrating juvenile and adult salmonids in the Walla Walla Basin |
a. Construct new juvenile screens and adult fishway at Hofer Dam diversion |
1 |
$1,008,000 |
Yes |
|
b. Establish small project cost share fund such as conversions to pumps, jump pools, weirs, etc. |
ongoing |
$100,000 |
Yes |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
FY 2003 | FY 2005 | FY 2004 | FY 2002 |
---|
$100,000 | $100,000 | $100,000 | $1,430,000 |
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
3. Provide safe passage at diversion structures for migrating juvenile and adult salmonids in the Walla Walla Basin |
a. Provide O&M at BPA funded fish passage facilities in Walla Walla Basin |
ongoing |
$150,000 |
Yes |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
FY 2003 | FY 2005 | FY 2004 | FY 2002 |
---|
$210,000 | $230,000 | $220,000 | $200,000 |
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
4. Provide safe passage at diversion structures for migrating juvenile and adult salmonids in the Walla Walla Basin |
a. Evaluate seals and velocities at Little Walla Walla screen facility to ensure that they meet design criteria |
1 |
$12,500 |
Yes |
|
b. Evaluate seals and velocities at Burlingame screen facility to ensure that they meet design criteria |
1 |
$12,500 |
Yes |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
FY 2003 | FY 2002 |
---|
$30,000 | $27,500 |
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
Item | Note | FY 2001 cost |
Subcontractor |
|
$568,000 |
Subcontractor |
|
$1,108,000 |
Subcontractor |
|
$150,000 |
Subcontractor |
|
$25,000 |
| $1,851,000 |
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2001 cost | $1,851,000 |
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
Total FY 2001 budget request | $1,851,000 |
FY 2001 forecast from 2000 | $250,000 |
% change from forecast | 640.4% |
Reason for change in estimated budget
The two primary reasons for the large increase over the FY2000 budget forecast are; 1) cost inflation for construction of currently implemented projects have resulted in budget shortages for previously identified projects and 2) additional projects identified for passage improvement since the original list was developed prior to ESA listings in the basin. Since ESA listings of summer steelhead and bull trout, additional projects have been identified by the Walla Walla Technical Work Group as critical for passage of these species. Many smaller projects are also being developed to improve passage conditions as a result of ESA which the requested "small project fund" would provide cost share funds of up to 50% for implementation/construction. Types of projects which would fall under this program would include conversions from gravity to pump diversions and elimination of pushup dams through use of rock weirs. The FY2000 forecast had identified only O&M costs for the outyears.
Reason for change in scope
As efforts in the basin have intensified due to the ESA listings and additional information has become available, the relative importance of various passage improvement projects has been reprioritized and new projects have been identified for implementation.
Cost sharing
Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Recommendation:
Ongoing Funding: yes; New Funding: no
Date:
Jul 14, 2000
Comment:
The two primary reasons for the large increase over the FY2000 budget forecast are; 1) cost inflation for construction of currently implemented projects have resulted in budget shortages for previously identified projects and 2) additional projects identified for passage improvement since the original list was developed prior to ESA listings in the basin. Since ESA listings of summer steelhead and bull trout, additional projects have been identified by the Walla Walla Technical Work Group as critical for passage of these species. Many smaller projects are also being developed to improve passage conditions as a result of ESA which the requested "small project fund" would provide cost share funds of up to 50% for implementation/construction. Types of projects which would fall under this program would include conversions from gravity to pump diversions and elimination of pushup dams through use of rock weirs. The FY2000 forecast had identified only O&M costs for the outyears. As efforts in the basin have intensified due to the ESA listings and additional information has become available, the relative importance of various passage improvement projects has been reprioritized and new projects have been identified for implementation.Although there has been no change in scope for this project, additional activities appear to have been added. It is not clear if these activities have been technically reviewed by an oversight committee, but they should probably be technically reviewed by the Anadromous Fish Committee prior to funding.
Recommendation:
Do Not Fund
Date:
Sep 13, 2000
Comment:
Rationale: Previous commitments remain available for scope of work; Project has 2.4 million already committed but not contracted - carried $1million from 1999.
REVIEW:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
Funding category:
expense
Date:
May 2005
FY05 NPCC start of year: | FY06 NPCC staff preliminary: | FY06 NPCC July draft start of year: |
$317,000 |
$317,000 |
$317,000 |
Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website