FY 2001 Ongoing proposal 199602100
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
| Title | Type |
|---|
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Gas bubble disease research and monitoring of juvenile salmonids |
| Proposal ID | 199602100 |
| Organization | U.S. Geological Survey-Biological Resources Division, Columbia River Research Lab. (USGS) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
| Name | Dr. Alec G. Maule |
| Mailing address | CRRL, 5501A Cook-Underwood Rd. Cook, WA 98605 |
| Phone / email | 5095382299 / [email protected] |
| Manager authorizing this project | Dr. James Seelye |
| Review cycle | FY 2001 Ongoing |
| Province / Subbasin | Systemwide / Systemwide |
| Short description | Provide support for the Smolt Monitoring Program (SMP) monitoring juvenile salmonids for signs of gas bubble disease. Activities include (1) care and maintenance of equipment, (2) training, and (3) QA/QC. |
| Target species | |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
| RPA |
|---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
| Year | Accomplishment |
|---|---|
| 2000 | Maintained and distributed dissecting microscopes to SMP |
| 2000 | Trained SMP employees, USFWS and regional consultants in the proper method for detecting signs of GBT |
| 2000 | Provided support for QA/QC |
| 1999 | same as 2000 |
| 1998 | same as 2000 |
| 1997 | same as 2000 |
| 1996 | same as 2000 |
| 1997 | Maule, A.G., J. Beeman, K.M. Hans, M.G. Mesa, P. Haner, and J.J. Warren. 1997. Gas Bubble Disease Research and Monitoring. 1996 Annual Report. |
| 1998 | Mesa, M.G., J. Beeman, K.M. Hans, P. Haner, L. Weiland, T.C. Robinson, and A.G. Maule. in BPA review. Gas Bubble Disease Research and Monitoring. 1997 Annual Report |
| 1999 | Beeman, J., T. C., Robinson, P. Haner, S. VanderKooi, and A.G. Maule. in BPA review. Gas Bubble Disease Research and Monitoring. 1998 Annual Report. |
| 2000 | Beeman, J., T. C., Robinson, P. Haner, S. VanderKooi, and A.G. Maule. in preparation. Gas Bubble Disease Research and Monitoring. 1999 Annual Report. |
| 1998 | Beeman, J.W., P.V. Haner, and A.G. Maule. 1998. A new miniature pressure-sensitive radio transmitter. North American Journal of Fisheries Management. 18:458-464 |
| 1999 | Hans, K.M., M.G. Mesa, and A.G. Maule. 1999. Rate of disappearance of gas bubble trauma signs in juvenile salmonids. Journal of Aquatic Animal Health 11: 383-390. |
| 1999 | Weiland, L.K., M.G. Mesa, and A.G. Maule. 1999. Influence of infection with Renibacterium salmoninarum on susceptibility of juvenile spring chinook salmon to gas bubble trauma. Journal of Aquatic Animal Health 11:123?129. |
| 2000 | Mesa, M.G., L.K. Weiland, and A.G. Maule. 2000. Progression and severity of gas bubble trauma in juvenile salmonids. Transactions American Fisheries Society. 129: 174-185 |
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Determine significance of GBD in juvenile salmonids migrating in the Snake and Columbia rivers | a. Maintain and distribute dissecting microscopes to be used by SMP monitors | 5 | $9,380 | |
| 1. NOTE: Duration of all tasks is based on continuing need to monitor GBT in emigrants. | b.Train SMP and, USFWS employees and regional consultants in the proper method for detecting signs of GBT | 5 | $10,917 | |
| 1. | c.Provide support for QA/QC | 5 | $2,972 |
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
| FY 2003 | FY 2005 | FY 2004 | FY 2002 |
|---|---|---|---|
| $26,890 | $31,075 | $28,907 | $25,015 |
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 2001 cost |
|---|---|---|
| Personnel | FTE: Supervisor - 0.04; Physiol. - 0.20 | $10,443 |
| Fringe | 30% of salary | $3,133 |
| Supplies | $1,000 | |
| Travel | $2,286 | |
| Indirect | 38% of total direct costs | $6,407 |
| $23,269 | ||
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 2001 cost | $23,269 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 2001 budget request | $23,269 |
| FY 2001 forecast from 2000 | $45,022 |
| % change from forecast | -48.3% |
Reason for change in estimated budget
Scope of work has decreased as fewer sites are being monitored.
Reason for change in scope
SMP reduced the number of fish to be examined.
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
REVIEW:
CBFWA Funding Recommendation
CBFWA Funding Recommendation
Recommendation:
Ongoing Funding: yes; New Funding: no
Ongoing Funding: yes; New Funding: no
Date:
Jul 14, 2000
Jul 14, 2000
Comment:
The scope of work has decreased as fewer sites are being monitored.The smolt monitoring program reduced the number of fish to be examined. The reduction in budget is not in the number of fish that will be examined, but in the number of sites they will be asked to visit for quality assurance and control.
Comment:
REVIEW:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
Funding category:
expense
expense
Date:
May 2005
May 2005
| FY05 NPCC start of year: | FY06 NPCC staff preliminary: | FY06 NPCC July draft start of year: |
| $16,885 | $16,885 | $16,885 |
Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website