FY 2001 Ongoing proposal 199700100
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
| Title | Type |
|---|
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Captive Rearing Project for Salmon River Chinook Salmon |
| Proposal ID | 199700100 |
| Organization | Idaho Department of Fish and Game (IDFG) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
| Name | Peter F. Hassemer |
| Mailing address | 1414 East Locust Lane Nampa, ID 83686 |
| Phone / email | 2084658404 / [email protected] |
| Manager authorizing this project | Steve Yundt |
| Review cycle | FY 2001 Ongoing |
| Province / Subbasin | Mountain Snake / Salmon |
| Short description | Develop captive rearing techniques for chinook salmon and evaluate the success and utility of captive rearing for maintaining stock structure and minimum number of adult spawners in three drainages. |
| Target species | |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
| RPA |
|---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
| Year | Accomplishment |
|---|---|
| 1995 | Collected brood year 1994 spring chinook salmon parr from the Lemhi River, East Fork Salmon River, and West Fork Yankee Fork Salmon River, and captive-reared fish. |
| 1996 | Collected brood year 1995 spring chinook salmon juveniles from the Lemhi River and reared. Continued rearing brood year 1994 fish. |
| 1996 | Less than 6% overall precocial (age 2) male maturation in brood year 1994 stocks. |
| 1996 | Successful transfer of brood year 1994 fish to saltwater. |
| 1997 | Less than 30% age-3 male maturation in brood year 1994 stocks. |
| 1997 | Successful outplanting of up to four, brood year 1994, three-year-old male chinook salmon to source streams. Movement and behavior documented. |
| 1997 | Milt from brood year 1994 East Fork Salmon River and West Fork Yankee Fork Salmon River male chinook salmon cryopreserved. |
| 1997 | Less than 6% male maturation in brood year 1995 Lemhi River chinook salmon (age 2). |
| 1997 | Collection of brood year 1996 spring chinook salmon parr from the Lemhi River and West Fork Yankee Fork Salmon River. |
| 1998 | Age 4 maturation in East Fork Salmon River (59%), West Fork Yankee Fork Salmon River (93%), and Lemhi River (74%) brood year 1994 stocks. |
| 1998 | Less than 26% male maturation in brood year 1995 Lemhi River stock (age 3). |
| 1998 | Less than 5% male maturation in brood year 1996 stocks (age 2). |
| 1998 | Successful outplanting of maturing brood year 1994 (four-year-old) and brood year 1995 (three-year-old Lemhi River males) chinook salmon to source streams. |
| 1998 | Documentation of 25, and 4 redds (constructed by captive program chinook) in the Lemhi River system and West Fork Yankee Fork Salmon River, respectively. |
| 1998 | Milt from brood year 1994, 1995, and 1996 captive chinook cryopreserved. |
| 1998 | Successful hatchery pilot investigations of gamete quality and survival to the eyed-egg stage for spawn products produced by Lehman River (brood year 1994, 1995), East Fork Salmon River (brood year 1994), and West Fork Yankee Fork Salmon River. |
| 1998 | Collection of brood year 1997 spring chinook salmon parr from the Lemhi River and West Fork Yankee Fork Salmon River. |
| 1999 | Age 5 maturation of brood year 1994 captive reared stocks and age 4 maturation of brood year 1995 captive reared stocks. |
| 1999 | Cryopreserved milt from mature brood year 1996 and brood year 1997 West Fork Yankee Fork Salmon River chinook salmon. |
| 1999 | Collected brood year 1998 natural parr from the Lemhi, West Fork Yankee Fork Salmon, and East Fork Salmon rivers. |
| 1999 | Collected brood year 1999 eyed-eggs from natural spawners in the East Fork Salmon and Lemhi rivers to establish captive populations. |
| 1999 | Produced brood year 1999 West Fork Yankee Fork Salmon River and East Fork Salmon River safety-net brood stocks to compliment eyed-egg collections. |
| 1999 | Successful hatch and early rearing of fish for captive populations established from eyed-egg collections and safety-net populations. |
| 1999 | Outplanted captive reared mature adults and monitored/documented spawning behavior and success. |
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3. Assess population viability and develop conservation management plan. | A. Assess population and viability and develop conservation management plan. | 2 | $4,949 | |
| B. Identify at risk spring/summer chinook stocks in Idaho. | 2 | $4,949 | ||
| C. Initiate NWPPC three step review process and complete step one. | 3 | $4,950 | ||
| D. Personnel and fish culture facility expansion feasibility study. | 3 | $4,950 |
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
| FY 2003 | FY 2002 |
|---|---|
| $15,000 | $30,000 |
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Produce captive-reared adult chinook salmon with morphological, physiological, and behavioral characteristics similar to naturally produced fish. | A. Develop facilities and propagation techniques to attain objectives. | 6 | $68,049 | |
| B. Collect fish/eggs from three stocks for the captive rearing program and rear fish. | 5 | $40,560 | ||
| C. Document propagation protocols including: formulation of feed used, rearing environment and protocols, handling frequency, fish health management and transportation methods. | 6 | $23,946 | ||
| D. Monitor growth and maturation of captive-reared fish. | 6 | $14,085 | ||
| E. PIT tag and visual implant tag all fish to facilitate population isolation and tracking during captive culture. | 6 | $12,086 | ||
| F. Cryopreserve milt from male captive chinook salmon as needed to preserve future options. | 6 | $9,686 | ||
| 2. Evaluate spawning behavior and success of out planted (captive-reared) adults. | A. Tag adults with externally visible tags prior to out planting, and radio-tag a reasonable number of fish for field tracking. | 6 | $6,302 | |
| B. Monitor movement, distribution, behavior, and spawning success of out planted fish. | 6 | $76,776 | ||
| C. Identify and document location of radio-tagged fish daily. | 6 | $56,772 | ||
| D. Map redd locations and note observed spawning pairings. | 6 | $52,862 | ||
| E. Perform snorkel surveys to estimate parr production. | 6 | $5,638 | ||
| F. Conduct pilot evaluations of gamete quality and survival to the eyed-egg stage. | 6 | $6,005 | ||
| 3. Assess population viability and develop conservation management plan. | A. Assess population viability and develop conservation management plan. | 2 | $11,871 | |
| B. Identify at risk spring/summer chinook stocks in Idaho. | 2 | $7,306 | ||
| C. Initiate NWPPC three step review process and complete step one. | 3 | $9,427 | ||
| D. Personnel and fish culture facility expansion feasibility study. | 3 | $7,467 | ||
| 4. Information/Technology transfer. | A. Participate in Technical Oversight Committee process. | 6 | $20,702 | |
| B. Develop and provide IDFG, other agency, and Tribal personnel with current, concise accounts of project activities. | 6 | $11,162 |
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
| FY 2003 | FY 2005 | FY 2004 | FY 2002 |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1,800,000 | $1,200,000 | $1,500,000 | $485,000 |
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 2001 cost |
|---|---|---|
| Personnel | FTE: 0.5 permanent | $11,466 |
| Fringe | Set by State of Idaho | $3,798 |
| Supplies | $191 | |
| Indirect | Set by State of Idaho, currently 28.1% | $4,343 |
| Personnel | FTE: 1.9 permanent, 3.0 temporary | $131,860 |
| Fringe | Set by State of Idaho | $43,678 |
| Supplies | Includes ~$12,000 for fish food and $5,000 for radio tags. | $37,959 |
| Travel | TOC meeting attendance and fish transfers between Eagle, ID and Manchester, WA. | $12,600 |
| Indirect | Set by State of Idaho, currently 28.1% | $83,445 |
| Capital | $57,900 | |
| PIT tags | # of tags: 1000 | $2,400 |
| Other | Rentals, leases, utilities, repairs, and other operating costs. | $70,860 |
| $460,500 | ||
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 2001 cost | $460,500 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 2001 budget request | $460,500 |
| FY 2001 forecast from 2000 | $450,000 |
| % change from forecast | 2.3% |
Reason for change in estimated budget
Annual costs for genetic analyses were not included in FY01 forecast from FY00. In addition to standard DNA analyses performed on all fish, a separate analysis must be performed to determine fish sex prior to sexual maturation for annual planning processes.
Reason for change in scope
This does not represent a change in scope.
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
REVIEW:
CBFWA Funding Recommendation
CBFWA Funding Recommendation
Recommendation:
Ongoing Funding: yes; New Funding: no
Ongoing Funding: yes; New Funding: no
Date:
Jul 14, 2000
Jul 14, 2000
Comment:
The budget has increased since annual costs for genetic analyses were not included in FY01 forecast from FY00. In addition to standard DNA analyses performed on all fish, a separate analysis must be performed to determine fish sex prior to sexual maturation for annual planning processes. There is no change in scope of work.Comment:
REVIEW:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
Funding category:
expense
expense
Date:
May 2005
May 2005
| FY05 NPCC start of year: | FY06 NPCC staff preliminary: | FY06 NPCC July draft start of year: |
| $509,000 | $509,000 | $509,000 |
Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website