FY 2001 Ongoing proposal 199803300

Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary

Reviews and Recommendations

Additional documents

Title	Type

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal title	Restore Upper Toppenish Creek Watershed
Proposal ID	199803300
Organization	Yakama Nation (YN)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
Name	Lynn Hatcher, Fisheries Program Manager
Mailing address	P.O. Box 151 Toppenish, WA. 98948
Phone / email	5098656262 / [email protected]
Manager authorizing this project
Review cycle	FY 2001 Ongoing
Province / Subbasin	Columbia Plateau / Yakima
Short description	Moderate flow regime in Toppenish Creek by increasing the retentiveness of natural soil water storage areas, such as headwater meadows and floodplains, following prioritized plan generated by FY98-99 hydrologic assessment.
Target species

Project location

Latitude	Longitude	Description

Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agency	Action #	BiOp Agency	Description

Section 2. Past accomplishments

Year	Accomplishment
2000	Hydrologic Assessment completed

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project ID	Title	Description

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 2001 cost	Subcontractor

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 2001 cost
Stabilize headcuts	A) Using machinery and hand labor, lay headcuts back and stabilize with combinations of vegetation, rock, geotextiles, etc.	2	$20,000
Retain sediment in degrading channels	A) Using combinations of machinery and hand labor, install appropriate sediment retention structures in ephemeral and intermittent channels	2	$15,000
Stabilize sediment deposits	A) Revegetate fresh sediment deposits with appropriate local vegetation	2	$25,000
Enhance channel/floodplain interaction	A) Remove or set back streamside dikes. B) Use salvaged rock from dikes and other appropriate material to increase overbank flow and/or roughness in degraded alluvial stream reaches	2	$30,000
Stabilize eroding uplands	A) Revegetate sensitive upland areas which are subject to excessive erosion. B) Repair, replace, and relocate fences, develop livestock management capabilities. C) Develop off channel stock water sites.	2	$30,000

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

FY 2003	FY 2004	FY 2002
$25,000	$25,000	$25,000

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 2001 cost
Maintain headcut stabilization efforts	Routinely visit and monitor headcut stabilization sites - make necessary adjustments and repair failures	4	$5,000
Maintain sediment retention facilities in degrading channels	Routinely visit and maintain sediment retention structures - upgrade as needed	4	$5,000
Maintain sediment stabilization efforts	Maintain annually, revegetation and soil stabilization sites - repair or augment as needed	4	$5,000
Maintain channel/floodplain enhancements	Maintain channel/floodplain enhancement efforts - repair and augment as needed.	4	$5,000
Stabilize eroding uplands	A) Maintain erosion control efforts annually - redo treatments as necessary B) Frequently visit livestock water and handling facilities - repair and upgrade as needed.	4	$20,000

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

FY 2005	FY 2003	FY 2004	FY 2002
$30,000	$50,000	$50,000	$50,000

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget

Objective	Task	Duration in FYs	Estimated 2001 cost	Subcontractor
Monitor and evaluate all projects at least annually, or more frequently if necessary	A) Monitor and evaluate all project sites on an annual basis or appropriate interval depending on treatment. B) Make modifications deemed necessary in the evaluation task above	4	$30,000

Outyear objectives-based budget

Objective	Starting FY	Ending FY	Estimated cost

Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

FY 2005	FY 2003	FY 2004	FY 2002
$30,000	$50,000	$50,000	$50,000

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget

Item	Note	FY 2001 cost
Personnel	FTE: 1 - professional and technicians combined	$26,857
Fringe	@ 25.3%	$6,795
Supplies	equipment rental, erosion control materials, etc.	$57,514
Indirect	@ 23.5%	$28,834
Personnel	FTE: .5 - professional and technicians combined	$13,429
Fringe	@25.3%	$3,398
Supplies	equipment rental, revegetation materials, other field supplies	$15,562
Indirect	@23.5%	$7,611
Personnel	FTE: .5 - professional and technicians combined	$13,429
Fringe	@25.3%	$3,398
Supplies	general monitoring supplies, instrument upgrade and repair, etc.	$7,464
Indirect	@23.5%	$5,709
		$190,000

Total estimated budget

Total FY 2001 cost	$190,000
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds	$0
Total FY 2001 budget request	$190,000
FY 2001 forecast from 2000	$350,000
% change from forecast	-45.7%

Reason for change in estimated budget

Hydrologic assessment indicates lower funding levels than previously anticipated.

Cost sharing

Organization	Item or service provided	Amount	Cash or in-kind

Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

REVIEW:
CBFWA Funding Recommendation

Recommendation:
Ongoing Funding: yes; New Funding: no

Date:
Jul 14, 2000

Comment:

Hydrologic assessment indicates funding levels lower than previously anticipated. There is no change in the scope of work.

REVIEW:
NWPPC Funding Recommendation

Recommendation:
Fund

Date:
Sep 13, 2000

Comment:

REVIEW:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review

Funding category:
expense

Date:
May 2005

FY05 NPCC start of year:	FY06 NPCC staff preliminary:	FY06 NPCC July draft start of year:
$415,046	$415,046	$415,046

Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website