FY 2001 Ongoing proposal 200002300

Additional documents

TitleType

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal titleSecuring Wildlife Mitigation Sites - Oregon, Horn Butte
Proposal ID200002300
OrganizationOregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
NameSusan P. Barnes
Mailing address2501 SW 1st Ave, P.O. Box 59 Portland, OR 97207
Phone / email5038725260 / [email protected]
Manager authorizing this projectSusan P. Barnes
Review cycleFY 2001 Ongoing
Province / SubbasinColumbia Plateau / Mainstem Columbia
Short descriptionProtect and enhance shrub-steppe and native bunch grass habitat in the Horn Butte area near the town of Arlington on the mainstem Columbia River to mitigate for wildlife and wildlife habitats impacted by the Columbia River federal hydropower system.
Target species
Project location
LatitudeLongitudeDescription
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agencyAction #BiOp AgencyDescription

Section 2. Past accomplishments

YearAccomplishment
1993 Completed Oregon Trust Agreement Planning (OTAP) Project
1997 Completed draft Assessing OTAP Project using Gap Analysis: Potential Mitigation for Impacts to Oregon Wildlife Resources Associated with Relevant Mainstem Columbia River and Willamette River Hydroelectric Projects
1997 FY 1997 OWC Programmatic Project proposal for $250,000 dollars for mitigation planning and coordination was approved by the NWPPC. OWC coordination/planning occurred, data was gathered on priority projects, and the securing of properties began.
1998 FY1998 OWC Programmatic Project proposal for $500,000 for mitigation planning and coordination was approved by the NWPPC. OWC coordination/planning occurred, potential projects were investigated, $ for Pine Ck Ranch and Ladd Marsh projects were obtained.
1998 Developed partnerships with BLM, Clearwater Land Exchange, Trust for Public Lands, and the Nature Conservancy to help facilitate project objectives in the Horn Butte area. Landowner negotiations began.
1998 FY 1999 OWC programmatic proposal submitted for $4 million for coordination/planning and implementation of individual projects was approved by the NWPPC. The Horn Butte project was approved for under this proposal.
1999 Continued landowner communications and negotiations.
2000 FY 2000 proposal for first-year restoration and O&M costs ($42,302) was approved by the NWPPC.
2000 FY 2000 proposal to continue acquisition and/or easement of lands in the Horn Butte area ($400,000) was approved by the NWPPC as under the OWC's FY 2000 programmatic proposal (Project No. 9705900).
2000 Continued landowner communications and negotiations.

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project IDTitleDescription

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2001 costSubcontractor
1. Assess Baseline Habitat Conditions on Acquired Lands a. Conduct HEP surveys one year $5,067
b. Conduct species surveys one year $1,000
(Note: FY 2000 carry forward funds will be used) c. Collect other necessary baseline data one year $1,000
2. Develop Management Plan(s) for Acquired Lands a. Evaluate baseline data to develop site goals and objectives one year $2,000
b. Prepare Interim Habitat Management Plan(s) one year $500
c. Prepare Habitat Management Plan(s) one - three years $1,500
(Note: FY 2000 carry forward funds will be used) d. Develop Operations & Maintenance Plan(s) one year $500
e. Develop Monitoring & Evaluation Plan(s) one year $500
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
FY 2003FY 2002
$15,000$20,000

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2001 costSubcontractor
1. Restore Habitat Values - Implement Management Plan(s) a. Alter existing land use practices (e.g., livestock grazing and agriculture, build fence) two years $8,600
b. Remove/control non-native vegetation four years $6,000
(Note: FY 2000 carry forward funds will be used) c. Plant/transplant native grasses and shrubs where removal of non-natives is insufficient to promote the restoration of native vegetation four years $3,724
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
FY 2003FY 2004FY 2002
$35,000$20,000$35,000

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2001 costSubcontractor
1. Maintain Habitat Values - Implement Operations & Maintenance Plan(s) a. Control expansion of non-native vegetation by addressing vectors (e.g., roads), and by using hand control, equipment removal and herbicides; plant native vegetation on-going $5,411
(Note: FY 2000 carry forward funds will be used) b. Maintain minimal infrastructure (e.g., fences, gates, signs, roadway, etc.) on-going $1,500
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
FY 2005FY 2003FY 2004FY 2002
$25,000$20,000$20,000$15,000

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2001 costSubcontractor
1. Measure Effectiveness of Habitat Restoration - Implement Monitoring & Evaluation Plan(s) a. Conduct vegetation surveys to monitor changes in plant communities (using HEP survey data, photo points/transects) on-going $2,500
b. Conduct wildlife surveys to monitor species response to habitat changes (using HEP survey data from periodic HEP sampling and wildlife inventory data) on-going $1,200
c. Analyze data using success criteria and established statistical methods (e.g., compare noxious weed infestation levels to pre-control survey levels) on-going $800
(Note: FY 2000 carry forward funds will be used) d. Prepare M&E reports on-going $500
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
FY 2005FY 2003FY 2004FY 2002
$15,000$10,000$10,000$7,000

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget
ItemNoteFY 2001 cost
Personnel FTE: part of a 0.25 FTE (includes HEP surveys, data collection, mgmt plan dev.) $6,100
Fringe @ 38% $2,367
Supplies $1,000
Travel $500
Indirect @ 26.6% $2,100
Personnel FTE: part of a 0.25 FTE $3,000
Fringe @ 38.8% $1,164
Supplies fence materials, seed, plants/transplants $3,660
Travel $1,000
Indirect @ 26.6% $1,500
Subcontractor Construct/repair fences, plant/transplant native grasses and shrubs, weed control $8,000
Personnel FTE: part of a 0.25 FTE $2,100
Fringe @ 38.8% $815
Supplies $1,516
Travel $700
Indirect @ 26.6% $780
Subcontractor Road maintenance; Weed Control District, fence contractor $1,000
Personnel FTE: part of a 0.25 FTE $2,200
Fringe @ 38.8% $800
Supplies $1,000
Travel $500
Indirect @ 26.6 % $500
$42,302
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2001 cost$42,302
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds$42,302
Total FY 2001 budget request$0
FY 2001 forecast from 2000$90,000
% change from forecast-100.0%
Reason for change in estimated budget

The FY 2000 Horn Butte project proposal estimate for FY 2001 assumed that first-year project activities had occurred. However, requested FY 2000 monies have not yet been spent. Thus, first-year restoration and O&M funds ($42,302) approved by the NWPPC under FY 2000 Project No. 20116 will be carried forward to complete the tasks outlined in this proposal. Lands in the HOtrn Butte area still need to acquired and will be acquired with OWC carry forward funds (see FY 2001 Project No. 199705900).

Reason for change in scope

Project delays occurred due to insufficient time and staffing to accomplish pre-acquisition project activities. Communications with several of the landowners in the Horn Butte area indicate that implementation of this project will be complex in nature. The project will likely involve a combination of fee-title acquisition purchase/easement and the trading of certain Horn Butte properties in order to secure targeted wildlife mitigation lands. This level of coordination likely to be necessary between ODFW, BLM, The Nature Conservancy, Trust for Public Lands, and the landowners was unanticipated and will take additional time to occur before project implementation.

Cost sharing
OrganizationItem or service providedAmountCash or in-kind

Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

Recommendation:
Date:
Jul 14, 2000

Comment:


Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Sep 13, 2000

Comment: