Section 1. Administrative
Proposal title | Walla Walla River Fish Passage Operations |
Proposal ID | 200003300 |
Organization | Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation (CTUIR) |
Proposal contact person or principal investigator |
Name | Brian Zimmerman |
Mailing address | P.O.Box 638 Pendleton, OR 97801 |
Phone / email | 5412764109 / [email protected] |
Manager authorizing this project | Gary A. James |
Review cycle | FY 2001 Ongoing |
Province / Subbasin | Columbia Plateau / Walla Walla |
Short description | Increase survival of migrating juvenile and adult salmonids in the Walla Walla Basin by operating passage facilities, trapping facilities, and transport equipment to provide adequate passage conditions. |
Target species | |
Project location
Latitude | Longitude | Description |
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Year | Accomplishment |
1998 |
Provided technical input on passage and trapping facility designs from 1998 to present. |
1999 |
Drafted basin annual operating plan. |
1999 |
Operation of juvenile screen sites, juvenile bypasses, and adult ladders from 1999 to present |
1999 |
Operation of adult trapping facility from 1999 to present. |
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Project ID | Title | Description |
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
1. Increase survival of migrating juvenile and adult salmonids |
a. Monitor river conditions and passage facility operations to ensure adequate passage |
ongoing |
$94,886 |
Yes |
|
b. Operate adult and juvenile trapping facilities |
ongoing |
$23,721 |
Yes |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
FY 2005 | FY 2003 | FY 2004 | FY 2002 |
---|
$144,000 | $131,000 | $137,000 | $124,500 |
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
Item | Note | FY 2001 cost |
Personnel |
FTE: 3.42 total for Umatilla and Walla Walla Fish Passage Operations projects - ~25% for Walla Walla |
$33,846 |
Fringe |
30% |
$10,154 |
Supplies |
|
$5,625 |
Travel |
|
$5,382 |
Indirect |
34% |
$18,702 |
Subcontractor |
ODFW-subcontractor participates in all tasks in conjunction with CTUIR - ~.4 FTE for Walla Walla |
$44,898 |
| $118,607 |
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2001 cost | $118,607 |
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
Total FY 2001 budget request | $118,607 |
FY 2001 forecast from 2000 | $88,000 |
% change from forecast | 34.8% |
Reason for change in estimated budget
This project is operated in conjunction with Umatilla Fish Passage Operations as one project. Activities in the Walla Walla Basin have increased beyond the anticipated level and the increase in the Walla Walla budget can be accounted for in corresponding reductions in the Umatilla River Fish Passage Operations budget as effort is redirected from the Umatilla to the Walla Walla subbasin. Combined budgets for the two Fish Passage Operations projects is ~8% lower than forecasted in the FY2000 proposals.
Reason for change in scope
No change in scope or tasks, just an increase in effort required to meet already identified tasks.
Cost sharing
Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Recommendation:
Ongoing Funding: yes; New Funding: no
Date:
Jul 14, 2000
Comment:
This project is operated in conjunction with Umatilla Fish Passage Operations as one project. Activities in the Walla Walla Basin have increased beyond the anticipated level and the increase in the Walla Walla budget can be accounted for in corresponding reductions in the Umatilla River Fish Passage Operations budget as effort is redirected from the Umatilla to the Walla Walla subbasin. Combined budgets for the two Fish Passage Operations projects is ~8% lower than those forecast in the FY 2000 proposals.There is no change in the scope of work or the tasks, just an increase in effort required to meet those already identified.
Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Sep 13, 2000
Comment:
Rationale: Budget increase inappropriate in this review.
REVIEW:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
Funding category:
expense
Date:
May 2005
FY05 NPCC start of year: | FY06 NPCC staff preliminary: | FY06 NPCC July draft start of year: |
$117,127 |
$117,127 |
$117,127 |
Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website