FY 2001 Ongoing proposal 200003500
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
Title | Type |
---|
Section 1. Administrative
Proposal title | Rehabilitation of Newsome Creek Watershed |
Proposal ID | 200003500 |
Organization | Nez Perce Fisheries/Watershed Program (NPT) |
Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
Name | Felix M. Mcgowan |
Mailing address | P.O. Box 365 Lapwai, ID 83540 |
Phone / email | 2088437320 / [email protected] |
Manager authorizing this project | Ira Jones |
Review cycle | FY 2001 Ongoing |
Province / Subbasin | Mountain Snake / Clearwater |
Short description | Protect and restore Newsome Creek Watershed for the benefit of fish, both resident and anadromous, and wildlife. |
Target species |
Project location
Latitude | Longitude | Description |
---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
RPA |
---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Year | Accomplishment |
---|---|
1989 | Forest Service placed instream structures in stream for fish habitat. |
1996 | Created a 50 year sediment trap and revegetated Gloryhole Mine Pit. |
2000 | Surveyed 85 miles of roads and began feasibility study on channel realignment. |
2000 | Began channel realignment feasibility study to be completed in 2001. |
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Project ID | Title | Description |
---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|---|---|---|---|
1. Design channel realignment | a. Gather any additional data needed | ongoing | $14,785 | |
b. Subcontract channel design. | 1 | $50,000 | Yes | |
c. Determine feasibility of channel realignment. | ongoing | $14,785 | ||
2. Plan and Design Road Treatment program. | a. Consult with Forest Service on roads to be treated in Newsome Creek Watershed. | ongoing | $14,786 | |
b. Perform all pre-work training. | ongoing | $14,785 | ||
c. Prepare and consult on any NEPA to be accomplished. | ongoing | $10,000 | ||
3. Lease field office in the South Fork. | a. Negotiate with the Nez Perce National Forest for office space. | ongoing | $10,000 | |
b. Develop contract for the leasing of field office. | ongoing | $27,021 |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
FY 2005 | FY 2003 | FY 2004 | FY 2002 |
---|---|---|---|
$168,055 | $168,055 | $168,055 | $168,055 |
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|---|---|---|---|
1. Alleviate sediment input and potential inputs from road sources. | a.Obliterate 12 miles of roads. | 1 | $160,832 | Yes |
b. Survey additional roads to be obliterated in out years. | 1 | $30,341 | ||
c. Provide erosion control crew to revegetate treated roads. | 1 | $30,341 |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
FY 2005 | FY 2003 | FY 2004 | FY 2002 |
---|---|---|---|
$324,319 | $268,032 | $294,835 | $243,666 |
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|---|---|---|---|
1. Perform monitoring and evaluation of road treatments. | a. Monitor road treatment success throughout the Newsome Creek Watershed. | 1 | $7,840 | |
b. Use point counts to determine revegetation. | 1 | $7,840 | ||
c. Measure changes in hydrological conditions. | 1 | $7,842 |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
FY 2005 | FY 2003 | FY 2004 | FY 2002 |
---|---|---|---|
$34,439 | $28,462 | $31,308 | $25,875 |
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
Item | Note | FY 2001 cost |
---|---|---|
Personnel | FTE: 2 | $35,520 |
Fringe | 27% of salary | $9,591 |
Supplies | copies, field supplies | $1,000 |
Travel | overnight field stays | $600 |
Indirect | 26.61% | $12,430 |
Capital | Lease of field office at Red River Ranger Station. | $37,021 |
NEPA | contributing in the NEPA process with the Forest Service | $10,000 |
Subcontractor | for channel realignment design. | $50,000 |
Personnel | FTE: 2 | $54,880 |
Fringe | 27% non tax free employees, 14% tax exempt employees. | $12,300 |
Supplies | Field supplies, office supplies, etc. | $1,500 |
Travel | 4 people @ $15/day for 60 days | $3,600 |
Indirect | 26.61% of above costs | $20,192 |
Subcontractor | Sub contract with the Forest Service to do the contract work for Road Treatment Program. | $125,442 |
Other | vehicle lease and maintenance | $3,600 |
Personnel | FTE: 2 | $8,880 |
Fringe | 27% non tax exempt employees | $2,398 |
Supplies | $500 | |
Travel | Travel for Road Treatment monitoring and training throughout the year. | $6,800 |
Indirect | 26.61% of above costs | $4,944 |
$401,198 |
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2001 cost | $401,198 |
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
Total FY 2001 budget request | $401,198 |
FY 2001 forecast from 2000 | $401,198 |
% change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
---|
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
CBFWA Funding Recommendation
Ongoing Funding: yes; New Funding: no
Jul 14, 2000
Comment:
There is no change in the budget or the scope of work.Comment:
Rationale: Budget increase inappropriate in this review. Consider implementation needs on completion of pending assessment?NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
expense
May 2005
FY05 NPCC start of year: | FY06 NPCC staff preliminary: | FY06 NPCC July draft start of year: |
$307,630 | $307,630 | $307,630 |
Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website