FY 2001 Ongoing proposal 200005800
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
| Title | Type |
|---|
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Effects of supersaturated water on reproductive success of adult salmonids |
| Proposal ID | 200005800 |
| Organization | U.S. Geological Survey-Biological Resources Division, Western Fisheries Research Center, Columbia River Research Lab (USGS) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
| Name | Dr. Alec G. Maule |
| Mailing address | CRRL, 5501A Cook-Underwood Rd. Cook, WA 98605 |
| Phone / email | 5095382299 / [email protected] |
| Manager authorizing this project | |
| Review cycle | FY 2001 Ongoing |
| Province / Subbasin | Systemwide / Systemwide |
| Short description | Determine if acute or chronic exposure to supersaturated water caused by spill during hydropower operations reduces reproductive success of adult salmonids by reducing fecundity, fertilization success or embryo viability. |
| Target species | |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
| RPA |
|---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
| Year | Accomplishment |
|---|---|
| 2000 | This is the first year of this study. In FY2000 we will determine the effects of 115, 120, 125, and 130% TDGS on reproductive potential in spring chinook salmon |
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Objective 1. Determine the effects of acute exposure to various TDGS levels on the fecundity of adult steelhead or sockeye salmon. | Task 1. a. Expose adult salmon to various levels of TDGS. We will stock 8 to 12 adult female salmon into tanks where they will be exposed to 115, 120, 125, or 130% TDGS. Fish will be tagged and returned to general hatchery population . | 1 | $56,553 | |
| Objective 1 | Task 1. b. Determine the effect of TDGS on fecundity, gonadosomatic index (GSI), and egg quality of steelhead or sockeye salmon. | 1 | $17,967 | |
| Objective 2. Determine the effects of chronic, in-river exposure to TDGS on fecundity of steelhead or sockeye salmon. | Task 2. a. Develop migratory scenarios based on available radio telemetry and archive tag studies (Dr. Ted Bjornn, USGS). Scenarios will include travel time between dams, depth and depth-compensated TDGS, and water temp. | 1 | $10,012 | |
| Objective 2. | Task2. b. Expose adult steelhead or sockeye salmon to chronic TDGS based on scenarios developed in Task 2.a. | 1 | $30,750 | |
| Objective 2. | Task 2. c Determine the effect of chronic TDGS on fecundity, gonadosomatic index (GSI), and egg quality of steelhead or sockeye salmon. | 1 | $7,879 | |
| Objective 3. Determine the impact of maternal exposure to acute (Objective 1) and chronic (Objective 2) TDGS on fertilization and short term survival of progeny of steelhead or sockeye salmon. | Task 3. a. Determine the fertilization rate for all experimental fish in Objectives 1 & 2. All eggs from a treatment female will be kept in an individual tray and dead eggs (i.e., those not fertilized) will be enumerated. | 1 | $7,425 | |
| Objective 3 | Task 3. b. Determine the short-term survival of progeny of all experimental fish in Objectives 1 & 2. | 1 | $7,669 | |
| Objective 4 | Task 4. a. Determine the total impact of TDGS on reproductive success of steelhead or sockeye salmon by comparing data collected on fish exposed to TDGS to that of fish handled but not exposed to TDGS and to fish in the general hatchery population. | 1 | $18,136 |
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
| FY 2002 |
|---|
| $166,000 |
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 2001 cost |
|---|---|---|
| Personnel | FTE: 1.6 | $73,974 |
| Fringe | 8% FOR TEMP; 30% FOR TERMS & PERMS | $14,687 |
| Supplies | lab supplies, hatchery supplies, gas gen. sys. | $21,500 |
| Travel | vehicle - $1890; per diem $1275 | $3,165 |
| Indirect | 38% | $43,065 |
| $156,391 | ||
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 2001 cost | $156,391 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 2001 budget request | $156,391 |
| FY 2001 forecast from 2000 | $848,533 |
| % change from forecast | -81.6% |
Reason for change in estimated budget
Objective 1 of the original proposal (radiotelemetry with depth tags) has been dropped.
Reason for change in scope
The COE is funding another investigator to do this work.
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
REVIEW:
CBFWA Funding Recommendation
CBFWA Funding Recommendation
Recommendation:
Ongoing Funding: no; New Funding: no
Ongoing Funding: no; New Funding: no
Date:
Jul 14, 2000
Jul 14, 2000
Comment:
This is a FY 2000 innovative project that is not eligible for FY 2001 funding until completion of the initial work and a final report on that work (NWPPC 2000-6).Comment:
CBFWA comment: This is a FY 2000 innovative project that is not eligible for FY 2001 funding until completion of the initial work and a final report on that work (NWPPC 2000-6).BPA response: This contract was let late in FY2000; it may not need any additional funds until FY2002.
Comment:
Rationale: Project scheduled for completion with existing funds.Comment:
Comment: