BPA Fish and Wildlife FY 1997 Proposal
Section 1. Administrative
Section 2. Narrative
Section 3. Budget
see CBFWA and BPA funding recommendations
Section 1. Administrative
Title of project
Conservation Easement Purchase, Lower Yakima River
BPA project number 5512200
Business name of agency, institution or organization requesting funding
Yakama Indian Nation
Sponsor type WA-Tribe
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
Name | Lynn Hatcher | |
Mailing address | P.O. Box 151
Toppenish, WA 98948 | |
Phone | 509/865-6262 |
BPA technical contact ,
Biological opinion ID
NWPPC Program number
Short description
Juvenile rearing and adult migration is not possible in the lower Yakima River for much of the summer due to extreme high temperatures. Purchasing development rights would lead to restoration and protection of critical riparian habitat, which in turn would improve water quality and spawning/rearing habitat by ensuring riparian function is maintained.
Project start year 1997 End year 2000
Start of operation and/or maintenance
Project development phase Implementation
Section 2. Narrative
Related projects
Project history
Biological results achieved
Annual reports and technical papers
Management implications
Specific measureable objectives
Pre- and post- project implementation riparian canopy closure would be quantified.
Testable hypothesis
Improving riparian canopy closure will increase rearing habitat function and improve water quality.
Underlying assumptions or critical constraints
Methods
Changes in riparian canopy will be determined with a densiometer.
Brief schedule of activities
The project would begin by notifying landowners of the program by fliers distribution. Meetings with interested landowners would occur. A rating system would be used to determine priority properties for purchase. Conservation easement language would be drafted with the assistance of an attorney. Easements would begin to be secured in year two. Further promotion of the project would occur through additional mailings. In year three, the time allocated to the project would be decreased to 0.25 FTE. The project would conclude after year five.
Biological need
From past research fish managers know that summer maximum temperatures in the lower Yakima River are too high to support salmonids. This effectively truncates the out migration of zero-age spring chinook, and prevents the reintroduction of stocks that require this reach during the critical season. This project would redress rearing habitat function through increasing riparian canopy closure, reducing sedimentation, increasing in-channel habitat complexity and improving water reducing substrate embeddedness.
Critical uncertainties
The lower 100 miles of the mainstem Yakima River cannot support anadromous fish because of lethal temperatures.
Summary of expected outcome
Native riparian vegetation density will increase. In turn, water quality will improve because canopy closure will improve. Ultimately, summer maximum temperatures will decrease. Ultimately the project will be used as a local demonstration area to encourage additional landowners to protect and restore streams.
Dependencies/opportunities for cooperation
Conservation easement purchase would be coordinated with the county assessors office, and the Yakima Greenway Foundation.
Risks
Monitoring activity
Canopy closure would be monitored over time.
Section 3. Budget
Data shown are the total of expense and capital obligations by fiscal year. Obligations for any given year may not equal actual expenditures or accruals within the year, due to carryover, pre-funding, capitalization and difference between operating year and BPA fiscal year.Historic costs | FY 1996 budget data* | Current and future funding needs |
(none) | New project - no FY96 data available | 1997: 9,671,031 1998: 50,400 1999: 25,200 2000: 25,200 2001: 25,200 |
* For most projects, Authorized is the amount recommended by CBFWA and the Council. Planned is amount currently allocated. Contracted is the amount obligated to date of printout.
Funding recommendations
CBFWA funding review group Bonneville Dam - Priest Rapids Dam
Recommendation Tier 2 - fund when funds available
Recommended funding level $9,671,031