FY 2001 Action Plan proposal 26032
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
| Title | Type |
|---|---|
| 26032 Narrative | Narrative |
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Adult Fish Transportation Vehicle Acquisition |
| Proposal ID | 26032 |
| Organization | Idaho Dept. of Fish and Game (IDFG) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
| Name | Thomas L. Rogers |
| Mailing address | 600 S. Walnut, P.O. Box Boise, ID 83707 |
| Phone / email | 2083343791 / |
| Manager authorizing this project | Sharon W. Keifer |
| Review cycle | FY 2001 Action Plan |
| Province / Subbasin | Mountain Snake / Salmon |
| Short description | Purchase an adult fish transport truck to enable fish managers and hatchery programs to outplant wild/natural salmon and steelhead above dewatered or modified habitats to ensure spawning environments are available to these fish. |
| Target species | Spring Chinook Salmon/Summer Steelhead |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 44.91 | -114.91 | Salmon Subbasin |
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
| RPA |
|---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
| Year | Accomplishment |
|---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Purchase Fish Transport Truck | Short turnaround on truck/tank purchase | 2 | $150,000 |
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 2001 cost |
|---|---|---|
| Capital | Adult fish tank/truck purchase, 2500 gal, conventional cab diesel truck, 50,000 gvw | $150,000 |
| $150,000 | ||
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 2001 cost | $150,000 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 2001 budget request | $150,000 |
| FY 2001 forecast from 2000 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| NONE | $0 | cash |
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Comment:
Not fundable. Inadequate proposal. This proposal is for the purchase of a fish-hauling truck only and not for specific uses of the truck to benefit fish. None of the solicitation criteria are directly satisfied by this purchase, although one could presume from the proposal that the truck would be used for fish in beneficial ways. One could argue that the responsibility for purchasing vehicles should be with the projects that use them, rather than funding a separate project. The proposal is very brief and incomplete.