FY 2003 Columbia Cascade proposal 29028
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
| Title | Type |
|---|---|
| 29028 Narrative | Narrative |
| 29028 Sponsor Response to ISRP | Response |
| Datasheet: Foghorn Fish Screen | Narrative Attachment |
| 29028 Powerpoint Presentation | Powerpoint Presentation |
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Fabricate and Install Three New Fish Screens on Wenatchee River Diversions |
| Proposal ID | 29028 |
| Organization | Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife, Yakima Screen Shop (WDFW/YSS) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
| Name | Eric B. Egbers |
| Mailing address | 3705 West Washington Avenue Yakima, WA 98903-1137 |
| Phone / email | 5095752733 / [email protected] |
| Manager authorizing this project | Eric B. Egbers |
| Review cycle | Columbia Cascade |
| Province / Subbasin | Columbia Cascade / Wenatchee |
| Short description | WDFW, YSS proposes to fabricate and install 2 new fish screening facilities, and rehabilitate one existing screening facility, on 3 irrigation diversions on the Wenatchee River and tributaries. The facilities will be in compliance with current criteria. |
| Target species | All anadromous salmonids, as well as other resident fish species. |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 47.6789 | -120.7271 | Chiwaukum Creek |
| 47.5692 | -120.5875 | Derby Canyon |
| 47.7803 | -120.4218 | Shotwell Ditch (Jones-Shotwell diversion?) |
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
| RPA |
|---|
| RPA Action 149 |
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| NMFS | Action 149 | NMFS | BOR shall initiate programs in three priority subbasins (identified in the Basinwide Recovery Strategy) per year over 5 years, in coordination with NMFS, FWS, the states and others, to address all flow, passage, and screening problems in each subbasin over 10 years. The Corps shall implement demonstration projects to improve habitat in subbasins where water-diversion-related problems could cause take of listed species. Under the NWPPC program, BPA addresses passage, screening, and flow problems, where they are not the responsibility of others. BPA expects to expand on these measures in coordination with the NWPPC process to complement BOR actions described in the action above. |
Section 2. Past accomplishments
| Year | Accomplishment |
|---|---|
| 1992 | Fabricate and install screens, gantry, and metalwork at Kiona (26 cfs) and Naches Cowiche (40 cfs) irrigation diversion sites. |
| 1993 | Fabricate and install screens, gantry, and metalwork at Snipes Allen (29 cfs), WIP Lower (6.8 cfs), New Cascade (147 cfs), and Holmes (2.2 cfs) irrigation diversion sites. |
| 1994 | Fabricate and install screens, gantry, and metalwork at Taylor (11.4 cfs), Congdon (43 cfs), and Kelly Lowry (29 cfs) irrigation diversion sites. |
| 1995 | Fabricate and install screens, gantry, and metalwork at Pioneer (14 cfs), Chiwawa (14 cfs), Toppenish Pump (100 cfs), WIP Upper (58 cfs), and Naches Selah (135 cfs) irrigation diversion sites. |
| 1996 | Fabricate and install screens, gantry, and metalwork at Peshastin (40 cfs), Fruitvale (39 cfs), Union Gap (58 cfs), Stevens (2.35 cfs), and Emerick (2.2 cfs) irrigation diversion sites. |
| 1997 | Fabricate and install screens, gantry, and metalwork at Bull (30 cfs), Ellensburg Mill (40 cfs), and Anderson (2.75 cfs) irrigation diversion sites. |
| 1998 | Fabricate and install screens, gantry, and metalwork at Clark (6.45 cfs), Lindsey (10.6 cfs), Younger (15 cfs), Chewuch (27 cfs) and Barkley (24 cfs) irrigation diversion sites. |
| 1999 | Fabricate and install screens, gantry, and metalwork at Johncox (17 cfs), Larson, Buttermilk (4.5 cfs), Eight Mile (4.5 cfs), and Wolf Creek (13 cfs) irrigation diversion sites. |
| 2000 | Fabricate and install screens, gantry, and metalwork at Skyline (17 cfs), Fulton (35 cfs), Twisp Power (10 cfs), and 10 small (< 4 cfs) Beaver Creek irrigation diversion sites. |
| 2001 | Fabricate and install screens, gantry, and metalwork at Early Winters (20 cfs), Chapman Nelson (3.5 cfs), Lewis (2.6 cfs), Foghorn (20 cfs), and 4 small (<4 cfs) Beaver Creek irrigation diversion sites. |
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2003 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Prevent anadromous and resident salmonids from entering the Jones-Shotwell, Derby Creek, and Chiwaukum Creek irrigation diversions. | a. Design, permit, and fabricate 2 new fish screening facilities at the Derby Creek and Chiwaukum Creek irrigation diversions, and rehabilitate the Jones-Shotwell screening facility. | 1 | $100,000 |
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2003 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Prevent anadromous and resident salmonids from entering the Jones-Shotwell, Derby Creek, and Chiwaukum Creek irrigation diversions. | a. Construct and install 2 new fish screening facilities at the Derby Creek and Chiwaukum Creek irrigation diversions, and rehabilitate the Jones-Shotwell screening facility. | 1 | $135,000 |
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2003 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Prevent anadromous and resident salmonids from entering the Jones-Shotwell, Derby Creek, and Chiwaukum Creek irrigation diversions. | 2004 | 2007 | $32,135 |
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
| FY 2004 | FY 2005 | FY 2006 | FY 2007 |
|---|---|---|---|
| $7,500 | $7,845 | $8,206 | $8,584 |
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2003 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Prevent anadromous and resident salmonids from entering the Jones-Shotwell, Derby Creek, and Chiwaukum Creek irrigation diversions. | a. Assess the effectiveness and "fish tightness" of the fish screening facilities at the 3 fish screening facilities by contracting with Battelle, Pacific Northwest Laboratory to conduct yearly biological and hydraulic evaluations. | $0 | Yes |
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Prevent anadromous and resident salmonids from entering the Jones-Shotwell, Derby Creek, and Chiwaukum Creek irrigation diversions. | 2004 | 2007 | $24,000 |
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
| FY 2004 | FY 2005 | FY 2006 | FY 2007 |
|---|---|---|---|
| $6,000 | $6,000 | $6,000 | $6,000 |
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 2003 cost |
|---|---|---|
| Personnel | FTE: 2.1 | $77,465 |
| Fringe | Employee benefits @ 31% of salaries | $24,014 |
| Supplies | Fabrication and construction materials and supplies | $45,128 |
| Travel | Includes mileage charges and subsistence | $19,763 |
| Indirect | Includes administrative overhead (@ 25.2%) and fixed operating costs | $51,249 |
| Capital | $0 | |
| NEPA | $0 | |
| PIT tags | $0 | |
| Subcontractor | $0 | |
| Other | Contingency @ 10% of subtotal to cover unanticipated costs | $17,381 |
| $235,000 | ||
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 2003 cost | $235,000 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 2003 budget request | $235,000 |
| FY 2003 forecast from 2002 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Recommendation:
Fundable only if response is adequate
Fundable only if response is adequate
Date:
Mar 1, 2002
Mar 1, 2002
Comment:
A response is needed. O&M plans and M&E plans for effectiveness monitoring should be given in detail. Monitoring and evaluation for overall biological effects should be included. The ISRP assumes that overall M&E is the responsibility of other projects, but this project should include pre-construction data from those projects and assure that data will be available post-construction to evaluate the cumulative effects of this and other projects.Comment:
These are important diversions that need to be screened. There is no cost share represented in the proposed budget. The budget should be reduced by 15% in order to encourage cost share by the landowners or other responsible parties. A contingency of $17,381 is identified in the proposal. These funds should be removed from the proposal. The budget has been modified to reflect these changes. NMFS has identified this project as a BiOp project.Comment:
Fundable. The response adequately described the O&M plans and M&E plans for effectiveness monitoring. Specifically, that this project include pre-construction data and assure that data will be available post-construction to evaluate the cumulative effects of this and other projects. The proponents should have included mention of the WDFW basinwide monitoring strategy under development.Comment:
Statement of Potential Biological Benefit to ESUIncrease survival by providing passage protection for all species and life stages of anadromous and resident salmonids through the construction at a couple of diversions that do not have screens and bypass structures and to upgrade an existing screen facility.
Comments
In their recommendation, ISRP felt that a response was still needed in detail on O&M and M&E plans. Assuming those condition are met, this is another good WDFW and Yakima Screen Shop project.
Already ESA Req? No
Biop? Yes
Comment:
Recommend deferral to Subbasin Planning. This kind of activity could support RPA 149.Comment: