FY 2001 Columbia Gorge proposal 200102700

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal titleWestern Pond Turtle Recovery - Columbia River Gorge
Proposal ID200102700
OrganizationWashington Department of Fish & Wildlife (WDFW)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
NameHarriet Allen/David P. Anderson
Mailing address600 Capitol Way North Olympia, WA 98650-1091
Phone / email3609022694 / [email protected]
Manager authorizing this projectHarriet Allen/David P. Anderson
Review cycleColumbia Gorge
Province / SubbasinColumbia Gorge / Fifteenmile
Short descriptionProtect existing WPT population through habitat improvements, expand WPT population through "head start " program and continue reintroductions at USFWS Pierce National Wildlife Refuge.
Target speciesWestern Pond Turtle
Project location
LatitudeLongitudeDescription
45.63 -122 Pierce National Wildlife Refuge
45.64 -121.93 Bergen Wildlife Area
Sondino Wildlife Area
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agencyAction #BiOp AgencyDescription

Section 2. Past accomplishments

YearAccomplishment
91-99 Released 302 juvenile western pond turtles through "head start" program in the Columbia River Gorge.
94-99 WDFW purchased approximately 250 in Klickitat County for protection of western pond turtle.
1999 Completed state recovery paln for western pond turtle.
2000 Conducted first releases for establishment of third population in Columbia River Gorge - Pierce NWR.

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project IDTitleDescription
Western Pond Turtle Recovery Project - ALEA Volunteer program to assist WDFW with recovery of WPT
Western Pond Turtle Partnerships USFWS cost share grant for WPT work in Gorge
WDFW/USFS/TNC WPT Habitat Development Private/Agency program to protect WPT habitat
Woodland Park Zoo and Oregon Zoo "head start" Zoos currently assisting with captive breeding and juvenile care

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2001 costSubcontractor
Recover western pond turtle in Columbia River Gorge a. Develop budget and plan for field activites associated with WPT recovery. Staff hiring, schedule, equipment purchase and coordination with USFWS/Woodland Park and Oregon Zoo ongoing $7,600
b. Purchase equipment FY 01 $28,020
c. contract development including overhead ongoing $33,405
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
FY 2002FY 2003FY 2004FY 2005
$7,600$7,600$7,600$7,600

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2001 costSubcontractor
Inventory and monitor WPT in Columbia River Gorge a. Annual surveys at Sondino, Bergen, Pierce NWR ongoing $7,500
b. mark re-capture at Sondino, Bergen, Pierce NWR ongoing $7,500
Conserve and enhance WPT population a. Maintain head starting program and evaluate survival ongoing $33,000
b. Establish new populaions & c. Control bullfrog population ongoing $14,000
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
FY 2002FY 2003FY 2004FY 2005
$62,000$62,000$62,000$62,000

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2001 costSubcontractor
Manage habitat to maximize WPT survival and productivity a. Upland areas adjacent to ponds will be mainatained to meadow condition ongoing $14,000
b. Improve basking sites ongoing $2,000
Maintain headstart program support c. Woodland Park and Oregon Zoo participation - funding to support husbandry efforts. $10,000/Zoo ongoing $20,000
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
FY 2002FY 2003FY 2004FY 2005
$35,000$20,000$30,000$30,000

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2001 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget
ItemNoteFY 2001 cost
Personnel $67,600
Supplies habitat improvement $16,000, equipment costs $28,020 $44,020
Indirect overhead $33,405
Subcontractor Woodland Park & Oregon Zoo $10,000 each bullfrog control $2000 $22,000
$167,025
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2001 cost$167,025
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds$0
Total FY 2001 budget request$167,025
FY 2001 forecast from 2000$0
% change from forecast0.0%
Cost sharing
OrganizationItem or service providedAmountCash or in-kind
WDFW Salary $12,000 in-kind

Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

Recommendation:
Fundable only if response is adequate
Date:
Oct 6, 2000

Comment:

Fundable only if the response makes a better case for the proposal's tie to the Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Program. Although this project relates to a Washington State Recovery Plan, it does not make any reference to the Fish and Wildlife Program. It was unclear if this was a species of concern across the region, e.g. in Oregon.

Otherwise, the project was well described, with clear objectives, a competent research and implementation team, and offers what appears to be a high likelihood of success. It was a bit difficult to assess PI credentials - no CVs provided.

This proposal addresses a recovery problem that already involves a number of agencies and NGOs. There were no explicit plans for information transfer from the project's results, however. The presentation was good and addressed several questions generated from the proposal review such as the results of the "head start" effort.


Recommendation:
Urgent/High Priority
Date:
Nov 15, 2000

Comment:

This project addresses a wildlife species that has been negatively affected by the hydrosystem. This species is listed as sensitive in the State of Washington.
Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Dec 1, 2000

Comment:

Fundable, the response was adequate. We raised only a few, mainly administrative, issues such as the proposal's lack of reference to Fish & Wildlife Program. The response addresses all those items satisfactorily and makes the case for the proposal's tie to the Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Program. CVs of researchers are provided.
Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Mar 16, 2001

Comment:


Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Sep 11, 2001

Comment:


Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Sep 20, 2003

Comment:

Contract period does not match fiscal year. Looks like pace of work is tracking well. Overhead bump coming in to increase costs for 04 and 05. Check back. Project has asked for two adjustments in 03. 02 affected 03 budget.
Recommendation:
Date:
Sep 20, 2003

Comment:


REVIEW:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
Funding category:
expense
Date:
May 2005
FY05 NPCC start of year:FY06 NPCC staff preliminary:FY06 NPCC July draft start of year:
$89,000 $89,000 $89,000

Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website