FY 2002 Columbia Plateau proposal 200202000

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal titleFabricate and Install New Hunstville Mill Fish Screen
Proposal ID200202000
OrganizationWashington Department of Fish & Wildlife, Yakima Screen Shop (WDFW/YSS)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
NameEric B. Egbers
Mailing address3705 West Washington Avenue Yakima, WA 98903-1137
Phone / email5095752733 / [email protected]
Manager authorizing this projectEric B. Egbers
Review cycleColumbia Plateau
Province / SubbasinColumbia Plateau / Walla Walla
Short descriptionWDFW, YSS proposes to fabricate and install a new fish screen facility (12 cfs) at the existing Huntsville Mill location within the Touchet River Basin. The new screen facility will comply with current state and federal criteria for fish protection.
Target speciesAll anadromous salmonids, as well as other resident fish species.
Project location
LatitudeLongitudeDescription
46.2832 -118.0865 Site is located off of US 12, between Waitsburg, WA and Dayton, WA, west of Lewis and Clark State Park, across from the Touchet Valley Airfield. Legal description: SW 1/4 NW 1/4 Section 5, Township 9 N, Range 38 E.
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agencyAction #BiOp AgencyDescription
NMFS Action 153 NMFS BPA shall, working with agricultural incentive programs such as the Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program, negotiate and fund long-term protection for 100 miles of riparian buffers per year in accordance with criteria BPA and NMFS will develop by June 1, 2001.

Section 2. Past accomplishments

YearAccomplishment
1992 Fabricate and install screens, gantry, and metalwork at Kiona (26 cfs) and Naches Cowiche (40 cfs) irrigation diversion sites.
1993 Fabricate and install screens, gantry, and metalwork at Snipes Allen (29 cfs), WIP Lower (6.8 cfs), New Cascade (147 cfs), and Holmes (2.2 cfs) irrigation diversion sites.
1994 Fabricate and install screens, gantry, and metalwork at Taylor (11.4 cfs), Congdon (43 cfs), and Kelly Lowry (29 cfs) irrigation diversion sites.
1995 Fabricate and install screens, gantry, and metalwork at Toppenish Pump (100 cfs), WIP Upper (58 cfs), and Naches Selah (135 cfs) irrigation diversion sites.
1996 Fabricate and install screens, gantry, and metalwork at Fruitvale (39 cfs), Union Gap (58 cfs), Stevens (2.35 cfs), and Emerick (2.2 cfs) irrigation diversion sites.
1997 Fabricate and install screens, gantry, and metalwork at Bull (30 cfs), Ellensburg Mill (40 cfs), and Anderson (2.75 cfs) irrigation diversion sites.
1998 Fabricate and install screens, gantry, and metalwork at Clark (6.45 cfs), Lindsey (10.6 cfs), and Younger (15 cfs) irrigation diversion sites.
1999 Fabricate and install screens, gantry, and metalwork at Johncox (17 cfs) irrigation diversion site.
1999 Fabricate and install screens, gantry, and metalwork at Johncox (17 cfs) irrigation diversion site.

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project IDTitleDescription
199601200 Walla Walla Basin Anadromous Fish Passage This project will aid in basin wide efforts to protect and restore ESA "threatened" steelhead and bull trout, and other anadromous (and resident) species.
198506200 Evaluation of Yakima Passage Improvements (PNNL) Fishery scientists from the Battelle, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) periodically evaluate completed screening projects. Independent hydraulic and biological evaluations provides valuable "adaptive management feedback".

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2002 costSubcontractor
1. Prevent anadromous and resident salmonids from entering the Huntsville Mill irrigation diversion. a. Design, permit, and fabricate fish screening facility at existing Huntsville Mill location which will comply with current state and federal fish protection criteria. 1 $102,217
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2002 costSubcontractor
1. Prevent anadromous and resident salmonids from entering the Huntsville Mill irrigation diversion. a. Construct and install a fish screening facility at existing Huntsville Mill location which will comply with current state and federal fish protection criteria. $0
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
1. Prevent anadromous and resident salmonids from entering the Huntsville Mill irrigation diversion. 2003 $120,000
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
FY 2003
$120,000

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2002 costSubcontractor
1. Prevent anadromous and resident salmonids from entering the Huntsville Mill irrigation diversion. a. Provide O&M services for a fish screening facility at existing Huntsville Mill location which will comply with current state and federal fish protection criteria. $0
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
1. Prevent anadromous and resident salmonids from entering the Huntsville Mill irrigation diversion. 2004 2006 $20,411
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
FY 2004FY 2005FY 2006
$6,500$6,799$7,112

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2002 costSubcontractor
1. Prevent anadromous and resident salmonids from entering the Huntsville Mill irrigation diversion. a. Assess the effectiveness and "fish tightness" of the fish screening facility at existing Huntsville Mill location by contracting with Battelle, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory to conduct yearly biological and hydraulic evaluations. $0 Yes
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
1. Prevent anadromous and resident salmonids from entering the Huntsville Mill irrigation diversion. 2004 2006 $12,000
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
FY 2004FY 2005FY 2006
$4,000$4,000$4,000

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget
ItemNoteFY 2002 cost
Personnel FTE: 1.8 $35,570
Fringe Employee benefits @ 31% of salaries $11,027
Supplies Fabrication materials and supplies $20,826
Travel Includes mileage charges and subsistence $26
Indirect Includes administrative overhead (@ 25.2%) and fixed operating costs $20,574
Capital $0
NEPA $0
PIT tags $0
Other Contingency @ 20% of subtotal to cover unanticipated costs $14,194
$102,217
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2002 cost$102,217
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds$0
Total FY 2002 budget request$102,217
FY 2002 forecast from 2001$0
% change from forecast0.0%
Cost sharing
OrganizationItem or service providedAmountCash or in-kind

Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

Recommendation:
Fundable - no response required
Date:
Jun 15, 2001

Comment:

Fundable. This is a carefully prepared proposal. It includes a good background to describe the problem and, based on information from elsewhere, describes its likely benefit. The proposal includes a monitoring element to verify that small fish are in fact prevented entry to the irrigation withdrawal system. The need has been demonstrated and prioritized.


Recommendation:
High Priority
Date:
Aug 3, 2001

Comment:

Recommended for funding by the NWPPC through the Action Plan Process.
Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Aug 10, 2001

Comment:

Fundable. This is a carefully prepared proposal. It includes a good background to describe the problem and, based on information from elsewhere, describes its likely benefit. The proposal includes a monitoring element to verify that small fish are in fact prevented entry to the irrigation withdrawal system. The need has been demonstrated and prioritized.
Recommendation:
Date:
Oct 1, 2001

Comment:

Statement of Potential Biological Benefit to ESU
The Huntsville Mill fish screen facility, which was originally constructed in 1957 and modified in 1969, does not meet NMFS and WDFW fish screen standards. This site is oriented 90 degrees to flow, does not provide sufficient drum screen submergence for self-cleaning, has approach velocities that exceed current criteria, and does not guide fish safely through the facility and back to the river. New screens would correct these problems.

Comments
Most of the larger diversions in the mainstem Walla Walla area have been identified for future improvements. One of the exceptions is the Huntsville Mill site, which is a City of Walla Walla water supply intake, and is one of the largest diversion in terms of flow in the upper Touchet River water shed.

Already ESA Req? no

Biop? yes


Recommendation:
Rank C
Date:
Oct 16, 2001

Comment:

This proposal came in under BPA's 2001 Action Plan solicitation. BPA did not fund it but deferred it to the Plateau Provincial Review. If it were to be funded, the project should include cost sharing with owners/beneficiaries. However, the project should be funded by BOR. Project justification is based on not meeting screening criteria, but no actual observations of fish losses are indicated. This project is not located in a high priority subbasin for screening, based on NMFS' 2000 Biological Opinion.
Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Jan 3, 2002

Comment:

Hunt's Mill screen proposal (25017)

This project was initially recommended for funding by the Council to Bonneville in the Action Plan solicitation in June 2001. BPA deferred this project to the Columbia Plateau for funding. NMFS has designated this project as consistent with the overall BiOp off-site mitigation strategy and actions (assigning a"500" rating) as a flow, passage, screening or water acquisition/lease project. The ISRP finds this project 'Fundable. This is a carefully prepared proposal, it includes a good background to describe the problem. The proposal includes a monitoring element to verify that small fish are in fact prevented entry to the irrigation withdrawal system. The need has been demonstrated and prioritized."

Staff Recommendation: See discussion above and fund as identified below and in the funding tables.

Budget effect on base program (Project 25017):

FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004
Increase $120,000 Increase $120,000 Increase $10,500

Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Mar 6, 2002

Comment:


Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Sep 20, 2003

Comment:

04 and 05 represent O&M on the screens.
Recommendation:
Date:
Sep 20, 2003

Comment:


REVIEW:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
Funding category:
expense
Date:
May 2005
FY05 NPCC start of year:FY06 NPCC staff preliminary:FY06 NPCC July draft start of year:
$10,500 $10,500 $10,500

Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website