FY 2002 Columbia Plateau proposal 200203200
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
Section 1. Administrative
Proposal title | Investigating passage of ESA-listed juvenile fall chinook salmon at Lower Granite Dam during winter when the fish bypass system is inoperable. |
Proposal ID | 200203200 |
Organization | U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; U.S. Geological Survey (USFWS/USGS) |
Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
Name | William P. Connor |
Mailing address | P.O. Box 18 Ahsahka, ID 83520 |
Phone / email | 2084767242 / [email protected] |
Manager authorizing this project | Howard L. Burge |
Review cycle | Columbia Plateau |
Province / Subbasin | Columbia Plateau / Mainstem Snake |
Short description | Describe passage timing, genetic lineage, scale patterns, and locations of fall chinook salmon that hold over in Lower Granite Reservoir during the winter. |
Target species | Fall chinook salmon |
Project location
Latitude | Longitude | Description |
---|---|---|
46.23 | -116.57 | Lower Granite Reservoir at Lewiston, Idaho |
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
RPA |
---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
---|---|---|---|
NMFS | Action 190 | NMFS | The Action Agencies shall continue to fund studies that monitor survival, growth, and other early life history attributes of Snake River wild juvenile fall chinook. |
NMFS/BPA | Action 190 | NMFS | The Action Agencies shall continue to fund studies that monitor survival, growth, and other early life history attributes of Snake River wild juvenile fall chinook. |
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Year | Accomplishment |
---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Project ID | Title | Description |
---|---|---|
199102900 | Life history and survival of fall chinook salmon | Use this project's radio telemetry equipment and infrastructure; share recature data on their PIT-tagged fish |
199302900 | Survival of juvenile salmon in Snake River | Share recapture data on their PIT-tagged fish |
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2002 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2002 cost | Subcontractor |
---|---|---|---|---|
1. Refine non-lethal methods for identifying the genetic lineage (i.e., fall or spring run) of holdover wild juvenile chinook salmon smolts for application to existing tissue samples collected from fish at Lower Granite and Little Goose in 1998, and | a. Validate and publish the non-lethal method for determining run membership of individual chinook salmon smolts. | 1 | $30,000 | |
1. | b. Summarize and publish the data collected at Lower Granite and Little Goose dams in 1998. | 1 | $15,000 | |
2. Refine non-lethal methods for identifying the age at saltwater entry for unmarked Snake River fall chinook salmon adults collected at Lower Granite from 1998 to 2001, and then assess the importance of the holdover strategy to adult returns to the Snak | a. Validate and publish scale pattern analysis methods for determining age at saltwater entry for adult fall chinook salmon | 1 | $15,000 | |
2. | b. Determine the age at saltwater entry for unmarked adults sampled at Lower Granite Dam from 1999 to 2005. | 5 | $3,000 | |
3. Determine if holdover wild fall chinook salmon smolts pass Lower Granite Dam during the winter when the fish bypass systems are shut down. | a. Determine where holdover juvenile fall chinook salmon over winter in Lower Granite Reservoir. | 3 | $10,000 | |
3. | b. Determine the feasibility of capturing holdover juvenile fall chinook salmon in Lower Granite Reservoir. | 1 | $3,000 | |
3. | c. Determine when holdover fall chinook salmon pass Lower Granite Dam. | 2 | $100,000 |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|---|---|---|
1. Refine non-lethal methods for identifying the genetic lineage (i.e., fall or spring run) of holdover wild juvenile chinook salmon smolts for application to existing tissue samples collected from fish at Lower Granite and Little Goose in 1998, and | 2002 | 2002 | $0 |
2. Refine non-lethal methods for identifying the age at saltwater entry for unmarked Snake River fall chinook salmon adults collected at Lower Granite from 1998 to 2001, and then assess the importance of the holdover strategy to adult returns to the Snak | 2002 | 2006 | $60,000 |
3. Determine if holdover wild fall chinook salmon smolts pass Lower Granite Dam during the winter when the fish bypass systems are shut down. | 2002 | 2004 | $200,000 |
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
FY 2003 | FY 2004 | FY 2005 | FY 2006 |
---|---|---|---|
$131,000 | $131,000 | $18,000 | $18,000 |
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2002 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2002 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
Item | Note | FY 2002 cost |
---|---|---|
Personnel | $61,500 | |
Fringe | $21,720 | |
Supplies | $35,000 | |
Travel | $5,000 | |
Indirect | $49,280 | |
Other | Boat operation | $3,500 |
$176,000 |
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2002 cost | $176,000 |
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
Total FY 2002 budget request | $176,000 |
FY 2002 forecast from 2001 | $0 |
% change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
---|---|---|---|
USGS | Radio telemetry equipment | $90,000 | in-kind |
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Fundable - no response required
Jun 15, 2001
Comment:
Fundable.
This is a good proposal for research needed to clarify the migration timing of fall chinook salmon that may overwinter in the Lower Snake River. Project personnel have identified a gap in understanding of life-history of chinook salmon. Bypass systems for migrating juvenile chinook salmon are closed between November and April at Lower Granite Dam. Recent information shows that this may impede emigrating fall chinook salmon that did not escape before November, but presumably stayed in the system through much of the winter (or alter our migration understanding, because of lack of monitoring data in winter). Preliminary data show that these fish make a significant contribution to the returning adults from a given brood. The proposal is to assess the significance of this situation for fall chinook salmon.
The proposal is generally complete and persuasive. The information in Part 1 is complete. There is an excellent background section. The work is justified with specific action items from the NMFS BiOp and the Subbasin Summary (but strangely not the FWP). There is a good description of the relationships to other projects, not just BPA's. There are good objectives (although stated more like tasks than as desired outcomes), tasks, and methods. One wonders if the scale pattern analysis for sea-water entry has been verified with elemental analyses (e.g., Sr/Ca ratios). There is an appropriate reference list. Staff resumes are complete and the staff is clearly competent to do the work. This is the same crew that has been doing the wild fall chinook studies underway since the early 1990s and this project is a logical extension of that work (but not within the existing scope). The studies are needed and this is the right group to do them.
Based on the presentation and discussion, it is even more convincing that we have generated an overwintering stock of fall chinook through our thermal manipulations of the Snake-Clearwater system. If it is happening, we are missing much of it with our standard fish monitoring operations that end in fall and don't begin again until spring. This change in life-cycle could be highly important for the general notion of species' adaptability and for the persistence of the Snake River wild fall chinook. It must be tested with the sort of work proposed here. A peculiarity is that the proposal continually implies that the bypass system should perhaps be operated for these fish, presumably to improve their survival, yet it provides data suggesting that their rate of survival is high relative to fish that do not hold over (i.e., use the bypass when it operates). Perhaps an alternative hypothesis deserves exploration. In summary, this is important work that deserves high priority for funding.
Comment:
This project addresses RPA 190. This proposal will need to be reviewed in the Systemwide Project Review Process to put it in context with all other passage projects. Funding should be provided to insure that this project is supported through the Systemwide review process.Comment:
Fundable. This is a good proposal for research needed to clarify the migration timing of fall chinook salmon that may overwinter in the Lower Snake River. Project personnel have identified a gap in understanding of life-history of chinook salmon. Bypass systems for migrating juvenile chinook salmon are closed between November and April at Lower Granite Dam. Recent information shows that this may impede emigrating fall chinook salmon that did not escape before November, but presumably stayed in the system through much of the winter (or alter our migration understanding, because of lack of monitoring data in winter). Preliminary data show that these fish make a significant contribution to the returning adults from a given brood. The proposal is to assess the significance of this situation for fall chinook salmon.The proposal is generally complete and persuasive. The information in Part 1 is complete. There is an excellent background section. The work is justified with specific action items from the NMFS BiOp and the Subbasin Summary (but strangely not the FWP). There is a good description of the relationships to other projects, not just BPA's. There are good objectives (although stated more like tasks than as desired outcomes), tasks, and methods. One wonders if the scale pattern analysis for seawater entry has been verified with elemental analyses (e.g., Sr/Ca ratios). There is an appropriate reference list. Staff resumes are complete and the staff is clearly competent to do the work. This is the same crew that has been doing the wild fall chinook studies underway since the early 1990s and this project is a logical extension of that work (but not within the existing scope). The studies are needed and this is the right group to do them.
Based on the presentation and discussion, it is even more convincing that we have generated an overwintering stock of fall chinook through our thermal manipulations of the Snake-Clearwater system. If it is happening, we are missing much of it with our standard fish monitoring operations that end in fall and don't begin again until spring. This change in life-cycle could be highly important for the general notion of species' adaptability and for the persistence of the Snake River wild fall chinook. It must be tested with the sort of work proposed here. A peculiarity is that the proposal continually implies that the bypass system should perhaps be operated for these fish, presumably to improve their survival, yet it provides data suggesting that their rate of survival is high relative to fish that do not hold over (i.e., use the bypass when it operates). Perhaps an alternative hypothesis deserves exploration. In summary, this is important work that deserves high priority for funding.
Comment:
Statement of Potential Biological Benefit to ESUWill provide a greater understanding of migratory behavior for the entire Snake River Fall chinook ESU, using radio telemetry, scale analysis, molecular techniques and other methods. The information gained through this project has the potential to allow more effective operation of bypass systems for Snake River Fall Chinook.
Comments
Fall chinook have low passage survival; this project will help determine how SR Fall chinook migratory behavior and bypass operations may interact to contribute to that low survival.
Already ESA Req? no
Biop? yes
Comment:
This proposal would describe passage timing, genetic lineage, scale patterns, and locations of fall chinook salmon that hold over in Lower Granite Reservoir during the winter. This proposal would meet objectives of the NMFS Biological Opinion.Comment:
Comment:
BPA intends to fund. This proposal would describe passage timing, genetic lineage, scale patterns and locations of fall chinook salmon that hold over in Lower Granite Reservoir during the winter. This proposal would meet objectives of the NMFS Biological Opinion RPA - 190.Comment:
Project was not recommended, but Bi-op BPA project.Comment:
Assuming that future project activities are not expanded.NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
expense
May 2005
FY05 NPCC start of year: | FY06 NPCC staff preliminary: | FY06 NPCC July draft start of year: |
$131,000 | $18,000 | $18,000 |
Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website