FY 2002 Columbia Plateau proposal 25098
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
Title | Type |
---|---|
Entry Page to CD-ROM: Matrixes for Wildlife-Habitat Relationships in Oregon and Washington | Narrative Attachment |
Table 1. A List 32 Wildlife-Habitat Types and the Number of Wildlife Species Associated with Each Type | Narrative Attachment |
Table 2. A list of structural conditions and the number of wildlife species associated with each condition | Narrative Attachment |
Cover Letter to BPA | Narrative Attachment |
25098 Narrative | Narrative |
25098 Powerpoint Presentation | Powerpoint Presentation |
Section 1. Administrative
Proposal title | Characterize and Assess Wildlife-Habitat Types and Structural Conditions for Subbasins within the Columbia Plateau Ecoprovince |
Proposal ID | 25098 |
Organization | Northwest Habitat Institute (NHI) |
Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
Name | Chris Kiilsgaard |
Mailing address | P.O. Box 855 Corvallis, Oregon 97339-0855 |
Phone / email | 5417532199 / [email protected] |
Manager authorizing this project | Thomas O'Neil |
Review cycle | Columbia Plateau |
Province / Subbasin | Columbia Plateau / Mainstem Columbia |
Short description | Fine-scale wildlife habitat assessment for the Columbia Plateau Ecoprovince will provide critical baseline data for planning and monitoring efforts that is consistent with the NWPPC 's Subbasin Planning process. |
Target species | All wildlife spcies that could potentially occur with the subbasin with a special emphasis for those species closely associated with riparian and wetland habitats and have a direct, or indirect relationship with resident and anadromous fish populations. |
Project location
Latitude | Longitude | Description |
---|---|---|
The proposal will create wildlife habitat maps, digital data bases, and wildlife distribution models for the 11 sub-basins that comprise the Columbia Plateau Ecoprovince. | ||
45.92 | -119.35 | Columbia Plateau province |
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
RPA |
---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Year | Accomplishment |
---|---|
1998 | Completed for USGS-Biological Resources Division: GAP Analysis Program a statewide map of Oregon Vegetation - Landscape Level Cover Types |
1998 | Completed for Oregon Fish and Wildlife a fine scale map (2 ac. miniimum mapping unit) of the Willamette Valley |
1999 | Completed for the Northwest Power Planning Council Wildlife-Habitat Type maps depicting Current and Historic Conditions of the Columbia River Basin |
2000 | Completed for Washington Dept. of Fish and Wildlife a statewide map of Washington's Wildlife-Habitat Types |
2001 | Co-developed and published a 768-page book and CD-ROM about Wildlife-Habitats Relationships in Oregon and Washington. |
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Project ID | Title | Description |
---|---|---|
2000742 | Establishing Baseline Key Ecological Functions of Fish & Wildlife for Sub-Basin Planning | An ecoprovince fine-scale habitat map would depict with greater accuracy areas where key ecological functions are increasing or decreasing. Baseline key ecological functions are an important omponent of NWPPC's Subbasin Planning Process. |
21005 | Characterize and Assess Wildlife-Habitat Types and Stuctural Conditions for Sub-Basins within the Columbia Gorge Ecoprovince | This project is for refined mapping at a sub-basin level and when completed will give a fine scale ecoprovince map. This ecoprovince map can then be compared with the Columbia Plateau map when it is done and eventually can build into a basin perspective |
21006 | Characterize and Assess Wildlife-Habitat Types and Stuctural Conditions for Sub-Basins within the Inter Mountain Ecoprovince | This project is also for refined mapping at a sub-basin level and when completed will give a fine scale ecoprovince map. This ecoprovince map can be compared with the Columbia Plateau and eventually be a part of building a basin perspective. |
24007 | Characterize and Assess Wildlife-Habitat Types and Stuctural Conditions for Sub-Basins within the Mountain Columbia Ecoprovince | This project is also for refined mapping at a sub-basin level and when completed will give a fine scale ecoprovince map. This ecoprovince map can also be compared with the Columbia Plateau and build into a basin perspective. |
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2002 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2002 cost | Subcontractor |
---|---|---|---|---|
1. Produce a fine-scale map assessing current wildlife habitat types and structural conditions within the Intermountain Sub-basin | a. Develop and classify spectral groups that would most closely represent wildlife-habitats type | 2.5 | $90,720 | |
b. Develop and classify spectral groups that would most closely represent structural conditions | 2.5 | $90,720 | ||
c. Validate mapping classifications via field visits | 2 | $115,920 | ||
2. Produce a written sub-basin assessment relating wildlife to wildlife-habitat types and structural conditions depicted by the mapping. | a. Using the wildlife-habitat relationships data set (that is part of the NWPPC's Subbasin Planning Process), write an assessment of the wildlife resource based on the current conditions mapped. | .3 | $22,265 | |
b. Develop metadata for each sub-basin's wildlife-habitat map | .1 | $5,600 | ||
c. Post data and findings at the web site | .1 | $5,600 |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|---|---|---|
1. Task A, B, and C we would envision that 40% of Task A & B would be completed in 2002; 40% in 2003; and 20% in 2004. | 2002 | 2004 | $469,437 |
2. The Tasks needed to completed this object require Objective 1 to be completed. As the subbasins are completed then Task C would be done. We would envision that 40% would be completed in 2002; 40% in 2003; and 20% in 2004. | 2002 | 2004 | $48,433 |
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
FY 2003 | FY 2004 |
---|---|
$340,704 | $177,166 |
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2002 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2002 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
Item | Note | FY 2002 cost |
---|---|---|
Personnel | FTE: 3.33 | $167,992 |
Fringe | 30% | $65,568 |
Supplies | $9,800 | |
Travel | 60 days: $55/nights lodging, $30/day food, $0.31 mileage | $19,200 |
Indirect | 26% | $68,265 |
$330,825 |
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2002 cost | $330,825 |
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
Total FY 2002 budget request | $330,825 |
FY 2002 forecast from 2001 | $0 |
% change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
---|---|---|---|
Northwest Habitat Institute | 12 Landsat Thematic Mapper Scenes | $7,200 | in-kind |
Northwest Habitat Institute | Global Position Satellite tracking unit, 3- workstations, lap-top computer, software to develop and field verify satellite imagery classification, and GIS software | $26,500 | in-kind |
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Fundable - no response required
Jun 15, 2001
Comment:
Fundable. The ISRP has reviewed versions of this proposal in each provincial review and the sponsors have adequately addressed the ISRP's concerns on validation and field-testing from those reviews.
We repeat our comments from previous reviews: The proposal makes a convincing case for the value of presenting complex habitat information in map form. The investigators have demonstrated the ability to produce high-quality maps at the Columbia Basin level. The project will develop Landsat maps of wildlife-habitat types for the Columbia Plateau Province at a finer level of resolution than is currently available. The maps will be made available to wildlife managers for the development of "coarse filter" conservation strategies. Subbasin summaries, while not directly calling for these maps, do demonstrate a need for mapping products.
The key issue for this project is support from the managers, and this proposal did not include letters of support.
Comment:
Fundable. The ISRP has reviewed versions of this proposal in each provincial review and the sponsors have adequately addressed the ISRP's concerns on validation and field-testing from those reviews.We repeat our comments from previous reviews: The proposal makes a convincing case for the value of presenting complex habitat information in map form. The investigators have demonstrated the ability to produce high-quality maps at the Columbia Basin level. The project will develop Landsat maps of wildlife-habitat types for the Columbia Plateau Province at a finer level of resolution than is currently available. The maps will be made available to wildlife managers for the development of "coarse filter" conservation strategies. Subbasin summaries, while not directly calling for these maps, do demonstrate a need for mapping products.
The key issue for this project is support from the managers, and this proposal did not include letters of support.
Comment:
Statement of Potential Biological Benefit to ESUN/A
Comments
Already ESA Req? N/A
Biop? no
Comment: