FY 2002 Columbia Plateau proposal 198343600
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
Title | Type |
---|---|
198343600 Narrative | Narrative |
Columbia Plateau: Umatilla Subbasin Map with BPA Fish & Wildlife Projects | Subbasin Map |
Columbia Plateau: Umatilla Subbasin Map with BPA Fish & Wildlife Projects | Subbasin Map |
Section 1. Administrative
Proposal title | Umatilla Basin Fish Facilities Operation and Maintenance |
Proposal ID | 198343600 |
Organization | Westland Irrigation District (WID) |
Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
Name | Mike Wick |
Mailing address | P.O. Box 416 Stanfield, OR 97875 |
Phone / email | 5414493272 / [email protected] |
Manager authorizing this project | Jay Marcotte |
Review cycle | Columbia Plateau |
Province / Subbasin | Columbia Plateau / Umatilla |
Short description | Provide Operations and Maintenance services of fish passage and satellite facilities in the Umatilla Basin. |
Target species | Coho, Fall Chinook, Spring Chinook, Summer Steelhead |
Project location
Latitude | Longitude | Description |
---|---|---|
Project locations include seven fish passage sites located on the Umatilla River between RM 3 and RM 34 plus six satellite acclimation and rearing sites located east and north of Pendleton, OR. | ||
45.78 | -119.23 | Umatilla River |
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
RPA |
---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Year | Accomplishment |
---|---|
1998 | Maintenance of trapping facilities from 1998 through present by Westland Irrigation District and since 1989 under this contract. |
1998 | Maintenance of spawning facilities has occurred from 1998 through present |
1998 | Operation and maintenance of juvenile bypasses and adult ladders from 1998 through present by Westland Irrigation District and since 1989 under this contract. |
1998 | Maintenance of acclimation sites has occurred from 1998 through present. |
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Project ID | Title | Description |
---|---|---|
8902700 | Power Re-pay Umatilla Basin Project | Umatilla Basin Project flow enhancement efforts are coordinated with operation of physical passage facilities which the proposed project provides O&M for. |
8802200 | Umatilla River Fish Passage Operations | Project 8802200 oversees proposed project O&M activities and operates passage and trapping facilities for which the proposed project provides O&M. |
8403300 | Umatilla Hatchery O & M | Proposed project provides adequate passage for juveniles produced under project 8403300 by operating and maintaing passage facilities. |
8343500 | Umatilla Hatchery Satellite Facilities O & M | Proposed project provides adequate passage for juveniles released by project 8343500 by operating and maintaining passage facilities. Also assists project 8343500 in maintaining satellite facilities. |
8902401 | Umatilla River/WEID Screens M&E | Proposed project provides O&M for facilities operated and evaluated by project 8902401. |
9000501 | Umatilla Basin Natural Production M & E | Proposed project provides passage for adults and juveniles to and from natural production areas by maintaining and operating passage facilities. |
9000500 | Umatilla Hatchery M & E | Proposed project maintains adult and juvenile trapping facilities. |
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2002 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2002 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2002 cost | Subcontractor |
---|---|---|---|---|
1. Increase survival of migrating juvenile and adult salmon and steelhead. | a. Operate and maintain passage facilities in the Umatilla Basin to ensure adequate passage. | Ongoing | $250,841 | Yes |
1. | b. Maintain adult and juvenile trapping facilities. | Ongoing | $167,227 | Yes |
2. Enhance production in the Umatilla River through operation of artificial propagation facilties. | a. Assist CTUIR in maintenance of adult holding and spawning facilities. | Ongoing | $60,332 | Yes |
2. | b. Assist CTUIR in maintenance of juvenile acclimation facilities. | Ongoing | $20,112 | Yes |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|---|---|---|
1. Increase survival of migrating juvenile and adult salmon and steelhead. | 2003 | 2006 | $1,134,846 |
1. | 2003 | 2006 | $755,812 |
2. Enhance production in the Umatilla River through operation of artificial propagation facilties. | 2003 | 2006 | $270,740 |
2. | 2003 | 2006 | $94,757 |
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
FY 2003 | FY 2004 | FY 2005 | FY 2006 |
---|---|---|---|
$523,450 | $549,625 | $577,110 | $605,970 |
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2002 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
Item | Note | FY 2002 cost |
---|---|---|
Personnel | FTE: 4.4 | $177,620 |
Fringe | 35% | $62,167 |
Supplies | Includes major overhaul of screens and purchase of metal building security & library | $92,000 |
Travel | $32,300 | |
Indirect | 15% | $57,225 |
Capital | Begin vehicle replacement rotation of one every four years. | $28,000 |
Subcontractor | West Extension ID subcontracts and participates in all project tasks. WEID costs are included above | $0 |
Other | Insurance, Equip Rental, Contract Services, Gravel Removal | $49,200 |
$498,512 |
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2002 cost | $498,512 |
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
Total FY 2002 budget request | $498,512 |
FY 2002 forecast from 2001 | $445,411 |
% change from forecast | 11.9% |
Reason for change in estimated budget
1)Begin vehicle replacement four-year cycle; current fleet of four vehicles were all purchased in 1998 and are accumilating high mileage. Implementing a cycle of purchasing one vehicle per year and replacing after four years of service will eliminate periodic large budget requests for vehicle replacement. 2) Employee compensation increase of 3%; updated management and bookkeeper costs.
Cost sharing
Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
---|
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Fundable - no response required
Jun 15, 2001
Comment:
Fundable. The site visits and presentations clearly indicated that benefits are accruing from these efforts. The additional benefits of enumeration facilities at some sites (e.g., resistivity counters for adult migrants) might be considered. Improvements elsewhere (e.g., flow increases due to habitat works) may lead to some reductions in items such as fish hauling, thus cost saving. Includes operation of the fish pump at Three Mile Dam, which is a tool that needs to be explored for future research on wild/hatchery interactions. Several rotating drums are utilized for fish screening - perhaps horizontal screens would be better suited for some areas. The evidence of a large component of strays (Deschutes?) should be a major concern. Coordination with the monitoring and evaluation projects (Hatchery and Natural Production) on this subject is essential.
Comment:
The NMFS suggests that this project is essential for maintaining anadromous fish access to the Umatilla RiverComment:
Fundable. The site visits and presentations clearly indicated that benefits are accruing from these efforts. The additional benefits of enumeration facilities at some sites (e.g., resistivity counters for adult migrants) might be considered. Improvements elsewhere (e.g., flow increases due to habitat works) may lead to some reductions in items such as fish hauling, thus cost saving. Includes operation of the fish pump at Three Mile Dam, which is a tool that needs to be explored for future research on wild/hatchery interactions. Several rotating drums are utilized for fish screening - perhaps horizontal screens would be better suited for some areas. The evidence of a large component of strays (Deschutes?) should be a major concern. Coordination with the monitoring and evaluation projects (Hatchery and Natural Production) on this subject is essential.Comment:
Statement of Potential Biological Benefit to ESUIncrease abundance/survival by providing access to habitat and improving passage survival of juvenile and adult salmon and steelhead; provide broodstock collection facilities for steelhead program designed to boost native population; acclimation facilities to improve homing / reduce straying of hatchery production
Comments
Passage element of project is necessary for maintaining anadromous fish access to much of the Umatilla River. Acclimation sites necessary to reduce straying into Snake River. Part of an over-all program that provides major fishery benefits.
Already ESA Req? NO
Biop? NO
Comment:
As stated above, the costs for satellite facility maintenance may appear excessive given the CTUIR's O&M project costs. The project includes no cost sharing by the irrigation districts or the BOR. BPA will pursue cost sharing; otherwise cumulative passage costs throughout the Columbia River Basin will be excessive and restrict our ability to meet ESA and F&W Program responsibilities.Comment:
Comment:
Comment:
03 budget same as 02, lower than recommended. Slight low accruals. Bumpy kind of O&M. 05 cost increase based on 3.4% COLA.Comment:
No comment submitted.NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
expense
May 2005
FY05 NPCC start of year: | FY06 NPCC staff preliminary: | FY06 NPCC July draft start of year: |
$492,405 | $492,405 | $492,405 |
Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website