FY 2002 Columbia Plateau proposal 198802200
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
Title | Type |
---|---|
198802200 Narrative | Narrative |
Columbia Plateau: Umatilla Subbasin Map with BPA Fish & Wildlife Projects | Subbasin Map |
Columbia Plateau: Umatilla Subbasin Map with BPA Fish & Wildlife Projects | Subbasin Map |
Section 1. Administrative
Proposal title | Umatilla River Fish Passage Operations |
Proposal ID | 198802200 |
Organization | Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation (CTUIR) |
Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
Name | Brian Zimmerman |
Mailing address | P.O. Box 638 Pendleton, OR 97801 |
Phone / email | 5412764109 / [email protected] |
Manager authorizing this project | Gary A. James |
Review cycle | Columbia Plateau |
Province / Subbasin | Columbia Plateau / Umatilla |
Short description | Increase survival of migrating juvenile and adult salmon and steelhead in the Umatilla Basin by operating passage facilities, flow enhancement measures, trapping facilities, and transport equipment to provide adequate passage conditions. |
Target species | Coho, Fall Chinook, Spring Chinook, and Summer Steelhead. Summer Steelhead are part of the Mid-Columbia ESU. |
Project location
Latitude | Longitude | Description |
---|---|---|
45.8822 | -119.3233 | Threemile Dam Facility on the lower Umatilla River near the town of Umatilla |
45.5875 | -118.7844 | McKay Reservoir on McKay Creek just south of the town of Pendleton |
The project works in the entire Umatilla River Basin, primarily in the mainstem between river mile 1 and 55 | ||
45.9144 | -119.3384 | Umatilla River |
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
RPA |
---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Year | Accomplishment |
---|---|
1989-2001 | Trapping and transportation of juvenile and adult salmonids has occurred annually to increase survival of juvenile and adult migrants. |
1989-2001 | Collected and transported broodstock for basin artificial production programs on an annual basis. |
1989-2001 | Collected and provided data on adult returns to Threemile Dam on an annual basis. |
1991-2001 | Operated and monitored passage facilities, including screen sites, juvenile bypasses, traps, and adult ladders annually to increase survival of juvenile and adult migrants. |
1993-2001 | Oversite and coordination of the Umatilla Basin Project flow enhancement effort has occurred annually to provide increased flows during critical migration periods. |
1996-2001 | Hauled surplus hatchery adult salmon to the Umatilla and Walla Walla basins to supplement natural spawning on an annual basis. |
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Project ID | Title | Description |
---|---|---|
8902700 | Power Repay - Umatilla Basin Project | Proposed project provides oversite and coordination of Umatilla Basin Project flow enhancement operations. |
8343600 | Umatilla Passage Facilities O&M | Proposed project works in coordination with project 8343600 to operate passage facilities and provides oversite to project 8343600 on maintenance of those facilities. |
8902401 | Umatilla River/WEID Screens M&E | Proposed project operates passage facilities that project 8902401conducts M&E at and provides migration information to project 8902401. |
8403300 | Umatilla Hatchery O&M | Proposed project provides adequate passage for juveniles produced at Umatilla Hatchery and provides broodstock for Umatilla Hatchery production. |
8343500 | Umatilla Hatchery Satellite Facilities O&M | Proposed project provides adequate passage for juveniles released by project 8343500 and collects and transports broodstock to satellite facilities operated by project 8343500. |
9000500 | Umatilla Hatchery M&E | Proposed project provides return data for hatchery adults and migration data on juveniles to project 9000500. |
9000501 | Umatilla Basin Natural Production M&E | Project provides adequate passage for natural adults and juveniles to and from natural production areas. Also provides return data for natural adults and migration data on juveniles to project 9000501. |
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2002 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2002 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2002 cost | Subcontractor |
---|---|---|---|---|
1. Increase the survival of migrating adult and juvenile salmon and steelhead. | a. Monitor river conditions and passage facility operations to ensure adequate passage conditions exist. | Ongoing | $101,543 | Yes |
1. | b. Operate adult trapping facilities | Ongoing | $158,678 | Yes |
1. | c. Operate juvenile trapping facilities | Ongoing | $12,692 | Yes |
1. | d. Operate transportation equipment | Ongoing | $71,066 | Yes |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|---|---|---|
1. Increase the survival of migrating adult and juvenile salmon and steelhead. | 2003 | 2006 | $1,556,723 |
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
FY 2003 | FY 2004 | FY 2005 | FY 2006 |
---|---|---|---|
$361,178 | $379,237 | $398,199 | $418,109 |
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2002 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
Item | Note | FY 2002 cost |
---|---|---|
Personnel | FTE: 3.42 - Combined Umatilla and Walla Walla Fish Passage Operations projects - ~80% for Umatilla here | $115,651 |
Fringe | 33% | $38,164 |
Supplies | $11,267 | |
Travel | $11,678 | |
Indirect | 34% | $60,099 |
Subcontractor | ODFW - subcontractor participates in all tasks in conjunction with CTUIR - ~1FTE Umatilla | $107,120 |
$343,979 |
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2002 cost | $343,979 |
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
Total FY 2002 budget request | $343,979 |
FY 2002 forecast from 2001 | $344,000 |
% change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
---|
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Fundable - no response required
Jun 15, 2001
Comment:
Fundable. This proposal is a continuation of a 13-year project to operate fish passage facilities on the Umatilla River. The proposal is well written and complete. This appears to have been a successful project over a period of considerable evolution as fish populations have been progressively restored and water returned to the river. The long-range objective is to phase out this project as river flows improve and problems with in-river migration are dealt with.
They need to make the ties of how this fits with program's Monitoring and evaluation project 199000501. They state on page 6 that they participate in the Umatilla Management and Monitoring and Evaluation Oversite (sic) Committee. What we are looking for is a specific statement of how they work closely with both monitoring and evaluation projects to assure that any data collected are shared with them.
Comment:
Comment:
Fundable. This proposal is a continuation of a 13-year project to operate fish passage facilities on the Umatilla River. The proposal is well written and complete. This appears to have been a successful project over a period of considerable evolution as fish populations have been progressively restored and water returned to the river. The long-range objective is to phase out this project as river flows improve and problems with in-river migration are dealt with.The sponsors need to make the ties of how this fits with program's Monitoring and evaluation project 199000501. They state on page 6 that they participate in the Umatilla Management and Monitoring and Evaluation Oversite (sic) Committee. What we are looking for is a specific statement of how they work closely with both monitoring and evaluation projects to assure that any data collected are shared with them.
Comment:
Statement of Potential Biological Benefit to ESUProject will increase survival of migrating juvenile & adult salmon & steelhead in the Umatilla Basin by operating passage facilities, flow enhancement measures, trapping facilities, & transport equipment to provide adequate passage conditions.
Comments
Proposal is a continuation of a 13-year project to operate fish passage facilities on the Umatilla River. As a result of this project, fish populations have been restored and water returned to the river.
Already ESA Req? no
Biop? NO
Comment:
Although these activities, e.g., operating and maintaining fihs ladders, bypasses, screens, and trap and haul equipment, are essential in the Umatilla subbasin, this project should consider cost sharing from the irrigation districts and /or BOR, since the work is mitigation for BOR irrigation activitiesComment:
Comment:
Comment:
Accruals look good, though check for over accruals. Indirect increases, COLA.Comment:
In FY 04 CTUIR is seeking an increase of $16,493 to cover previous years unfunded increases of Indirect rates. Unfunded 2002 Indirect rate increase @ 37.2% = $6,478. Unfunded 2003 Indirect rate increase @ 39.64% = $10,015.NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
expense
May 2005
FY05 NPCC start of year: | FY06 NPCC staff preliminary: | FY06 NPCC July draft start of year: |
$362,164 | $362,164 | $362,164 |
Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website