FY 2001 High Priority proposal 23003
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
| Title | Type |
|---|---|
| 23003 Narrative | Narrative |
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Experimental Selective Fishery Techniques Development, Evaluation, and Coordination |
| Proposal ID | 23003 |
| Organization | National Marine Fisheries Service, Northwest Regional Office, Sustainable Fisheries Division (NMFS) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
| Name | Robert E. Bayley |
| Mailing address | 525 N.E. Oregon St, Suite 510 Portland, OR 97232 |
| Phone / email | 5032305432 / [email protected] |
| Manager authorizing this project | Bill Robinson, Assistant Regional Administrator |
| Review cycle | FY 2001 High Priority |
| Province / Subbasin | Systemwide / Systemwide |
| Short description | Design and/or solicit proposals, and begin coordinating development and testing of selective fishery techniques in the Columbia River Basin, evaluating short- and long- term mortalities of fish encountered during effort directed at harvestable species. |
| Target species | Salmon and steelhead species, primarily chinook (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), steelhead (O. mykiss), and coho (O. kisutch) |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
| RPA |
|---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
| Year | Accomplishment |
|---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
| FY 2002 | FY 2003 | FY 2004 | FY 2005 |
|---|---|---|---|
| $400,000 | $400,000 | $400,000 | $400,000 |
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 2001 cost |
|---|---|---|
| Other | funding of proposals | $400,000 |
| $400,000 | ||
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 2001 cost | $400,000 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 2001 budget request | $400,000 |
| FY 2001 forecast from 2000 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| National Marine Fisheries Service | Project Management and Coordination | $0 | in-kind |
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Comment:
This proposal does not address imminent risks to ESA stocks by offering direct on-the-ground benefits with one-time funding. A science program is not adequately defined. The proposed activity is for coordination and an ongoing task. The proposal fails to adequately describe how stocks of spring chinook would be identified.Comment:
This project is called for in the NMFS Biological Opinion but does not meet the criteria for high priority as defined by the NWPPC for this process. This project is considered a high priority need at this time.