FY 2001 High Priority proposal 23018
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
Title | Type |
---|---|
23018 Narrative | Narrative |
Section 1. Administrative
Proposal title | Crawford Vegetative Management Road Decommission |
Proposal ID | 23018 |
Organization | USDA Forest Service, Malheur National Forest, Blue Mountain Ranger District (USFS) |
Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
Name | Dan Hagen, Access And Travel Manager |
Mailing address | P.O. Box 849 John Day, OR 97845 |
Phone / email | 5415753342 / [email protected] |
Manager authorizing this project | Doug Robin, District Ranger |
Review cycle | FY 2001 High Priority |
Province / Subbasin | Columbia Plateau / |
Short description | Decommission 45 miles of developed forest roads in the Crawford Vegetation Management Project of the Upper Middle Fork John Day River watershed. These roads are currently hindering spawning, rearing, and/or migration of two federally listed fish species. |
Target species | steelhead, bull trout, chinook, redband |
Project location
Latitude | Longitude | Description |
---|---|---|
44.68 | -118.76 | Middle Fork John Day River |
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
RPA |
---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Year | Accomplishment |
---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Project ID | Title | Description |
---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
FY 2003 | FY 2004 |
---|---|
$2,500 | $20,000 |
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
FY 2002 | FY 2003 | FY 2004 | FY 2005 |
---|---|---|---|
$13,000 | $13,500 | $6,000 | $6,500 |
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
Item | Note | FY 2001 cost |
---|---|---|
Personnel | FTE: Forest Service support personnel | $15,520 |
Supplies | Stakes, flagging, computer time, camera, film, etc. | $3,000 |
Travel | 3,000 miles | $2,550 |
Indirect | $1,000 | |
Subcontractor | For identified work in above table numbers 1, 2, and 3. | $90,000 |
$112,070 |
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2001 cost | $112,070 |
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
Total FY 2001 budget request | $112,070 |
FY 2001 forecast from 2000 | $0 |
% change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
---|---|---|---|
Blue Mountain Demonstration Area | 45 miles of road decommissioning and 75 miles of road closures. | $64,000 | cash |
$20,000 | cash | ||
Oregon Dept. of Fish and Wildlife | Personnel for redd counts and population surveys (outyear) | $30,750 | in-kind |
BPA | Supplies, materials, property identified in third line of itemized table above plus remaining non-funded portion of $90,000 - $62,000. | $29,000 | cash |
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Comment:
The rationale is good, and in general the action is known to be beneficial. However, the claims for potential benefit are not supported in the proposal through references or otherwise. The proposal specifically identifies the roads to be decommissioned. Cost share is good. The M&E effort seems ample, but the plans for it are not well described.Comment:
The proposal claims that it had been coordinated with the state and tribe, which it has not. This project also raises in-lieu questions.