FY 2001 High Priority proposal 23059
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
| Title | Type |
|---|---|
| 23059 Narrative | Narrative |
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Prevention and Control of Agricultural Water Pollution in the Columbia Basin of Oregon |
| Proposal ID | 23059 |
| Organization | Oregon Department of Agriculture (ODA) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
| Name | Ray Jaindl |
| Mailing address | 635 Capitol St NE Salem, OR 97301-2532 |
| Phone / email | 5039864713 / [email protected] |
| Manager authorizing this project | Ray Jaindl |
| Review cycle | FY 2001 High Priority |
| Province / Subbasin | Columbia Plateau / |
| Short description | Accelerate implementation of the Oregon Department of Agriculture’s agricultural water quality management program. This program contributes to achieving the state water quality standards, the Oregon Plan for Salmon and Watersheds. |
| Target species | All anadromous fish and resident fish |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 45.92 | -119.35 | Columbia Plateau province |
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
| RPA |
|---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
| Year | Accomplishment |
|---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
| FY 2002 |
|---|
| $1,806,000 |
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 2001 cost |
|---|---|---|
| Personnel | FTE: per existing MOAs with SWCDs | $2,821,000 |
| Fringe | per existing MOAs with SWCDs | $1,200,000 |
| Supplies | per existing MOAs with SWCDs | $430,000 |
| Travel | per existing MOAs with SWCDs | $335,000 |
| Indirect | for ODA administration of funds (15% NWPPC grant funds) | $555,000 |
| $5,341,000 | ||
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 2001 cost | $5,341,000 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 2001 budget request | $5,341,000 |
| FY 2001 forecast from 2000 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| ODA | Monitoring, implementation, outreach | $1,400,000 | in-kind |
| Soil and water conservation districts | Monitoring, implementation, outreach | $1,400,000 | cash |
| OWEB | Support technical assistance for farm plan development | $1,200,000 | cash |
| EPA 319 grant | Monitoring, implementation, outreach | $140,000 | cash |
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Comment:
This proposal is for infrastructure and does not address imminent risks to ESA stocks by offering direct on-the-ground benefits with one-time funding.Comment:
This project is mostly a planning exercise that addresses important aspects of subbasin planning. It does not meet the high priority criteria for addresses an imminent risk to survival, however, this project should move forward under the NWPPC subbasin planning exercise.