FY 2001 High Priority proposal 200201200

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal titleLower Columbia River and Estuary Habitat Assessment and Mapping Project
Proposal ID200201200
OrganizationLower Columbia River Estuary Program (LCREP)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
NameDebrah Marriott
Mailing address811 SW Naito Parkway, Suite 120 Portland, OR. 97225
Phone / email5032261565 / [email protected]
Manager authorizing this projectDebrah Marriott, Director
Review cycleFY 2001 High Priority
Province / SubbasinColumbia Estuary / Mainstem Columbia
Short descriptionDevelop high definition, geographically accurate data set of lower Columbia River aquatic and wetland habitat structure to use as baseline for identifing critical salmonid/native species habitat and for prioritizing protection and restoration actions
Target speciesAll Columbia River listed salmonids
Project location
LatitudeLongitudeDescription
46.13 -123.56 Columbia Estuary subbasin
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agencyAction #BiOp AgencyDescription
NMFS/BPA Action 158 NMFS During 2001, the Corps and BPA shall seek funding and develop an action plan to rapidly inventory estuarine habitat, model physical and biological features of the historical lower river and estuary, identify limiting biological and physical factors in the estuary, identify impacts of the FCRPS system on habitat and listed salmon in the estuary relative to other factors, and develop criteria for estuarine habitat restoration.

Section 2. Past accomplishments

YearAccomplishment

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project IDTitleDescription

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2001 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2001 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2001 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
FY 2002FY 2003FY 2004FY 2005
$100,000$500,000$500,000$500,000

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2001 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
FY 2002FY 2003FY 2004FY 2005
$50,000$50,000$50,000$50,000

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget
ItemNoteFY 2001 cost
Personnel FTE: .25 scientist .25 volunteer coordinator .1 program support $35,000
Supplies satellite images, equipment rental, field supplies $7,000
Travel $3,000
Indirect includes fringe benefits $6,500
Subcontractor University of Washington Earth Design Consultants Ecotrust Hyperspectal Data International $205,000
$256,500
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2001 cost$256,500
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds$0
Total FY 2001 budget request$256,500
FY 2001 forecast from 2000$0
% change from forecast0.0%
Cost sharing
OrganizationItem or service providedAmountCash or in-kind
Lower Columbia R. Estuary Program Pilot hyperspectral mapping for select areas $106,000 cash

Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

Recommendation:
N/A
Date:
Feb 1, 2001

Comment:

This proposal for mapping does not address imminent risks to ESA stocks by offering direct on-the-ground benefits with one-time funding. The proposal did not adequately describe why LCREP is now proposing to do this detailed mapping after their report is out (with similar maps) or demonstrate that past mapping projects by the US Army Corps of Engineers are not adequate.
Recommendation:
HP "B" S
Date:
Feb 1, 2001

Comment:

This is a data collection effort and will not provide any direct benefits to anadromous fish.
Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Apr 30, 2003

Comment:

Fund as recommended and to implement RPA 158.
Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Sep 20, 2003

Comment:

Project not recommended through provincial review, special Council recommendation. Project should close? No funds beyond this year, but will have one month accrual for 04, perhaps $4K.
Recommendation:
Date:
Sep 20, 2003

Comment: