FY 2001 High Priority proposal 23090
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
Title | Type |
---|---|
23090 Narrative | Narrative |
Section 1. Administrative
Proposal title | Farm to Fish |
Proposal ID | 23090 |
Organization | Shoshone-Bannock Indian Tribe of the Fort Hall Indian Reservation (SBT) |
Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
Name | Daniel H. Israel |
Mailing address | HC5 Box 69A Payson, AZ 85541 |
Phone / email | 5204682059 / [email protected] |
Manager authorizing this project | Chad Colter and Keith Kutchins of S/B |
Review cycle | FY 2001 High Priority |
Province / Subbasin | Mountain Snake / |
Short description | Provide State of the art water distribution facilities to Lemhi River irrigators in order to restore River flows for salmon and trout reproduction |
Target species | Salmon, Steelhead, Bull Trout |
Project location
Latitude | Longitude | Description |
---|---|---|
45.1879 | -113.8891 | Lehmi River |
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
RPA |
---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Year | Accomplishment |
---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Project ID | Title | Description |
---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
FY 2002 | FY 2003 | FY 2004 | FY 2005 |
---|---|---|---|
$25,000,000 | $25,000,000 | $25,000,000 | $25,000,000 |
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2001 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
Item | Note | FY 2001 cost |
---|---|---|
Personnel | $65,000 | |
Supplies | $500 | |
Travel | $16,500 | |
Indirect | $6,000 | |
$88,000 |
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2001 cost | $88,000 |
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
Total FY 2001 budget request | $88,000 |
FY 2001 forecast from 2000 | $0 |
% change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
---|---|---|---|
S/B | Biological and hydrology services required to re-establish flows | $35,000 | in-kind |
Assist in design and implementation of Farm to Fish plan. | $35,000 | in-kind |
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Comment:
This proposal is at the planning rather than implementation phase and does not address imminent risks to ESA stocks by offering direct on-the-ground benefits with one-time funding. They will need guarantees that saved water will be left in the streamComment: