FY 2003 Middle Snake proposal 32006
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
| Title | Type |
|---|---|
| 32006 Narrative | Narrative |
| 32006 Sponsor Response to the ISRP | Response |
| 32006 Powerpoint Presentation | Powerpoint Presentation |
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Compare the parr-smolt transformation of nonanadromous and anadromous populations of Oncorhynchus mykiss |
| Proposal ID | 32006 |
| Organization | Idaho Department of Fish and Game (IDFG) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
| Name | Alan Byrne |
| Mailing address | 1414 East Locust Lane Nampa, ID 83686 |
| Phone / email | 2084658404 / [email protected] |
| Manager authorizing this project | Steve Yundt |
| Review cycle | Middle Snake |
| Province / Subbasin | Middle Snake / Weiser |
| Short description | Determine if O. mykiss populations that were were historically accessible to the ocean but are now blocked by dams can produce smolts. |
| Target species | Oncorhynchus mykiss |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 44.553 | -116.6931 | Little Weiser River |
| 44.1036 | -115.9999 | MF Payette River |
| 46.8619 | -115.4329 | Collins Creek |
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
| RPA |
|---|
| 175 |
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
| Year | Accomplishment |
|---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 199005500 | Steelhead supplementation studies | share personnel and equipment |
| 199107200 | Redfish Lake sockeye salmon captive broodstock rearing and research | share personnel and equipment |
| 199700100 | Captive rearing initiative for Salmon River chinook salmon | share personnel and equipment |
| 199800200 | Snake River native salmonid assessment project | collect bull trout and other resident fish data that is valuable for this project |
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2003 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2003 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Quantify smolt production of nonanadromous O. mykiss populations in streams that were historically accessible to anadromous steelhead but are now blocked by dams. | a1. Operate fish traps in the Little Weiser River and Collins Creek during the fall and spring to trap migrating O. mykiss. Estimate the number of fish migrating with mark-recpature metodology. PIT-tag O. mykiss > 125mm. | 3 | $35,710 | |
| 1. | a2. Transport trapped O. mykiss migrants to rearing facilities (Little Weiser River migrants to Oxbow Hatchery and Collins Creek to Clearwater Hatchery) and for release in-river. | 3 | $17,671 | |
| 1. | b1. Determine the number of PIT-tagged O. mykiss migrants released in-river that are detected at lower Snake River and Columbia River dams and estimate the potential smolt production in each stream. | 3 | $4,585 | |
| 1. | c1. Hold 200 wild O. mykiss migrants in circular tanks at the rearing facilities throughout the winter. Hold 200 anadromous hatchery steelhead and 200 nonanadromous hatchery rainbow in separate tanks at each facility. | 3 | $26,337 | |
| c2. Sample fish from each group at the rearing facilities on five occasions beginning March 1 and ending June15 for the smolt physiological tests and analysis. This work will be done in FY2004 and FY2005 only at a cost of $25,000/year. | 2 | $0 | Yes | |
| 1. | d1. Prepare an annual report(s) and a final report of the research findings (done in cooperation with Idaho Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, University of Idaho). | 3 | $6,227 | Yes |
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Quantify smolt production of nonanadromous O. mykiss populations in streams that were historically accessible to anadromous steelhead but are now blocked by dams. | 2003 | 2005 | $286,287 |
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
| FY 2004 | FY 2005 |
|---|---|
| $111,667 | $84,090 |
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2003 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2003 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 2003 cost |
|---|---|---|
| Personnel | FTE: 1.6 | $22,718 |
| Fringe | $8,745 | |
| Supplies | $3,620 | |
| Travel | $5,430 | |
| Indirect | overhead (20.9% of personnel and operating) | $8,467 |
| Capital | 1 screw trap and 30 circular tanks | $28,050 |
| PIT tags | # of tags: 2,000 | $4,500 |
| Subcontractor | Idaho Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho | $9,000 |
| $90,530 | ||
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 2003 cost | $90,530 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 2003 budget request | $90,530 |
| FY 2003 forecast from 2002 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Other budget explanation
The budget for FY2003 includes the one time cost of capitol outlays (screw trap and circular tanks to hold fish) and fall trapping. The FY2004 budget includes spring and fall trapping and cost of the smolt physiology tests and analysis. FY2005 includes cost of spring trapping, smolt physiology tests and analysis, and preparing final reports and journal articles. All budget amounts were calculated using constant dollars, no adjusts were made for inflation.
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Recommendation:
Fundable only if response is adequate
Fundable only if response is adequate
Date:
Mar 1, 2002
Mar 1, 2002
Comment:
A response is needed. Please address more fully the question of whether the sample size of PIT-tagged fish in tasks a and b is large enough for detection of possible differences. Also, describe the specific hypotheses that would be tested in tasks a-c.Comment:
Comment:
Fundable, in the sense that this is a well-designed study and it would be interesting to know the answer to the question posed in the proposal. If passage problems in the Hells Canyon reach can ever be solved, this information would be of value. The lab component monitoring physiological attributes, however, seems very low priority. The response adequately addressed the questions of whether the sample size of PIT-tagged fish in tasks a and b is large enough for detection of possible differences and also the specific hypotheses that would be tested in tasks a-c.Comment: