FY 2002 Mountain Columbia proposal 198806500
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
Title | Type |
---|---|
198806500 Narrative | Narrative |
198806500 Powerpoint Presentation: 2003 Update | Powerpoint Presentation |
Mountain Columbia: Kootenai Subbasin Map with BPA Fish & Wildlife Projects | Subbasin Map |
Mountain Columbia: Kootenai Subbasin Map with BPA Fish & Wildlife Projects | Subbasin Map |
Section 1. Administrative
Proposal title | Kootenai River Fisheries Recovery Investigations |
Proposal ID | 198806500 |
Organization | Idaho Department of Fish and Game (IDFG) |
Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
Name | Vaughn L. Paragamian |
Mailing address | Idaho Department of Fish and Game, 2750 Kathleen Ave Coeur d' Alene, ID 83815 |
Phone / email | 2087691414 / [email protected] |
Manager authorizing this project | Charlie Craig |
Review cycle | Mountain Columbia |
Province / Subbasin | Mountain Columbia / Kootenai |
Short description | Recover the Kootenai River white sturgeon, develop a recovery plan for burbot and bull trout, improve fishing for rainbow and cutthroat trout and mountain whitefish, rehabilitate ecosystem health. |
Target species | Kootenai River white sturgeon (Acipenser transmontanus), burbot (Lota lota) , rainbow (Oncorhynchus mykiss), bull (Salvelinus confluentus), and westslope cutthroat (O. clarki lewisi) trout, and mountain whitefish (Prosopium williamsoni) |
Project location
Latitude | Longitude | Description |
---|---|---|
48.82 | -116.39 | Kootenai River |
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
RPA |
---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Year | Accomplishment |
---|---|
1991 | White sturgeon eggs captured for the first time in Kootenai River. |
1993 | Capture of 17 burbot in Idaho indicates they are not extirpated. |
1994 | Burbot densities in Idaho are very low but concentrated at Ambush Rock (rkm 244.5). |
1994 | Abundance of rainbow trout in tributaries to Kootenai River are similar to those of late 1970s but numbers in river are lower. |
1995 | Hypothesis developed infering river flow impair burbot spawning migrations and fitness. Hypothesis was tested,in 1997-1998, high flows impairs burbot spawning migration. |
1995 | Juvenile sturgeon can be sampled with small mesh gill nets. |
1995 | Creel survey indicates rainbow trout are the most sought after species but whitefish are most important in harvest. |
1996 | Growth and condition of sturgeon in Kootenai River lower than other white sturgeon populations. |
1996 | Kootenai River white sturgeon are spawning over sand substarte in low velocity water and survival of eggs and fry thought to be very poor. |
1996 | Population estimate of sturgeon indicates about 1,555 adults and 87 juveniles. |
1997 | The capture of several juvenile wild white sturgeon from flow test years are the first measures of reproductive success. |
1997 | Burbot in Kootenai River and Kootenay Lake genetically distinct from burbot above Kootenai Falls in Montana |
1997 | Kootenai River white sturgeon migration behavior and environmental variables were modeled. |
1998 | Evidence is mounting, Many KR burbot are reproductively disfunctional, male burbot are found post-spawn in various stages of reproductive readiness, females are resorbing eggs. |
1998 | Rainbow trout spawners in Deep Creek (major tributary to Kootenai River in Idaho) are adfluvial stock and juveniles seed lower river in Idaho and Kootenay Lake, B.C. |
1998 | Seismic studies of the Kootenai River subbottom indicates 5 m of coarse sand, throughout the present spawning reach. |
1998 | Organized and managed the International Burbot Symposium in Baltimore, MD. |
1998 | Deep Creek is found to be the primary location of rainbow spawning below Bonners Ferry and many fish are transboundary, juveniles are seeding lower river and Kootenay Lake. |
1998 | Genetic studies of rainbow trout in the KR are thought tio be an intergrade of coastal and other strains. |
1999 | Most bull trout appear to be spawning in tribuitaries in Montana. |
1999 | Published results of mtDNA analysis of burbot in BC, Idaho, and Montana. |
1999 | Analysis of burbot from Duncan Lake, BC, indicates they are genetically similar to those of Kootenai River. |
1999 | Esitmated recruitment of rainbow trout from Deep Creek appears to be about 45,000 - 55,000 fish/year. |
1999 | Burbot population estimated at about 550 fish in Idaho and BC. |
2000 | Most spawning of rainbow trout above Bonners Ferry appears to be taking place in Montana. |
2000 | The capture of eight unspawned male burbot beyond the spawning season (in addition to five females and several males from previous seasons) adds further evidence to the hyothesis that a large segment of the poopulation is reproductively disfunctional |
2000 | Completed publication of Proceedings of the International Burbot Symposium. |
2000 | Published 3 ms. in Proceedings of the International Burbot Symposium. |
2000 | Detaled analysis of changes in KR white sturgeon focal spawning locations indicates Kootenay Lake elevations explain over 53% of the variation. Historic spawning is estimated to have occrred near Bonners Ferry and sediment corings show a layer of gravel. |
2000 | Telemetry indicates burbot in Duncan Lake have a similar adfluvial behavior as fish in Kootenai River. |
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Project ID | Title | Description |
---|---|---|
19101903 | Libby Reserrvoir levels/Kootenia River IFIM | Recovery of Kootenai River white sturgeon is dependent on augmented spring flows for sturgeon spawning and rearing. Winter low flows to test limitations to burbot migrations are dependent on water management from Libby. IFIM studies will provide habitat |
198806400 | Kootenai River white sturgeon study and experimental culture | IDFG is a cooperator with the Kootenai Tribe of Idaho (KTOI). IDFG assists the tribe in the capture of brood fish for their hatchery and evaluates the hatchery contribution to the population, interaction between juvenile wild/hatchery sturgeon. |
199404900 | Kootenai River ecosystem improvement study | IDFG is a partner in the Adaptive Ecosystem Assessment method (AEA) with the Kootenai Tribe. IDFG has been a participant in the AEA process. Present studies with KTOI are building a large scale data base for pre-fertilization treatment. |
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2002 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2002 cost | Subcontractor |
---|---|---|---|---|
Obj. 2) Test Null Hypothesis: survival of larval sturgeon released over sand substrate is higher than larvae released over cobble substrate. | a.Release two groups of larval sturgeon. | 2002-2004 | $2,000 | |
b.Measure larval abundance of two groups | 2002-2004 | $2,000 | ||
c.Measure fingerling and larval abundance | 2002-2004 | $2,000 | ||
Obj. 3) Determine how changes in Kootenay Lake elevation effects white sturgeon spawning location. Will cost share with USGS. | a.Develop lake/river flow model. | 2002 | $40,967 | Yes |
b.Revise model to iden.lake/river interface | 2002 | $40,967 | Yes | |
c.Determine historic lake river interface | 2002 | $40,967 | Yes | |
Obj 4) Evaluate the use of artificial substrates and instream structures to improve white sturgeon egg and larval survival and relocate sturgeon spawning | a.Develop an artificial spawning channel | 2003-2006 | $0 | |
b.Integrate w/Obj 1, M&E, egg deposition | 2003-2006 | $0 | ||
Obj 5) Test null hypothesis that winter operation of Libby Dam does not effect burbot migration distance or travel rate. Measure test and control in travel time, km/day | a.Capture adult burbot in hoopnets. | 2002-2006 | $12,050 | |
b.Implant or attach transmitters to 10. | 2002-2006 | $12,050 | ||
c.Monitor burbot during test and control | 2002-2006 | $12,050 | ||
d.Evaluate spawning success with gear. | 2002-2006 | $12,050 | ||
e.Deploy continous recording temp gauge | 2002-2006 | $12,050 | ||
f.Monitor burbot migration to Idaho. | 2002-2006 | $12,050 | ||
Obj 6) Test null hypothesis that high winter flows do not cause stress in burbot and impair reproductive fitness. | a.Collect blood samples from 25 burbot | 2002-2004 | $1,000 | |
b.Evaluate 4 plasma steroids (hormones) | 2002-2004 | $2,500 | ||
c.Collect 15 samples from control popula | 2002-2004 | $3,000 | ||
d.Evaluate plasma steroids from control. | 2002-2004 | $2,500 | ||
e.Statisically compare blood steroids | 2002-2004 | $500 | ||
f.Biopsy post spawn burbot, % unspawned | 2002-2004 | $1,500 | ||
Obj 7) Test null hypothesis under laboratory conditions that various flows and temperatures do not cause stress in burbot and impair reproductive fitness. | a.Subject burbot to 4 flow and temp tests | 2002-2003 | $12,500 | |
b.Set up labcontrol for burbot | 2002-2003 | $12,500 | ||
c.Evaluate 4 plasma steroids in burbot | 2002-2003 | $2,500 | ||
d.Evaluate control and compare to test | 2002-2003 | $2,500 | ||
Obj 8) Estimate the number of burbot from Bonners Ferry, ID, to Kootenay Lake, BC. and provide estimate of recruitment and survival. | a.Implant PIT tags in all burbot. | 2002-2006 | $1,000 | |
b.Enter all burbot captured from 1993-06 | 2002-2006 | $1,000 | ||
c.Use Seber-Jolly model-Pop/recruit/survi | 2002-2006 | $2,000 | ||
Obj 9) Determine affective means of sampling larval burbot and white sturgeon. | a.Deploy drift nets. | 2002-2004 | $3,850 | |
b.Use benthic trawls | 2002-2004 | $3,850 | ||
c.Use paired half m nets | 2002-2004 | $3,850 | ||
d.Deploy D-rings | 2002-2004 | $3,850 | ||
Obj 10) Conduct a sportfishery survey on the Kootenai River from the Montana border to Deep Creek to determine angler use, harvest, sprtfish catch, catch effort, and as part of Large Scale sampling to determine eventual benefits to fertilization. | a.Establish statistical design for creel surv | 2002 | $1,000 | |
b.Interview anglers | 2002 | $40,000 | ||
c.Measure weigh all fish | 2002 | $1,000 | ||
d.Conduct instantaneous counts | 2002 | $10,000 | ||
e.Note finclips and tags | 2002 | $500 | ||
f.Estimate angler exploitation | 2002 | $250 | ||
g.Estimate use, harvest,and catch rates | 2002 | $250 | ||
Obj 11) Determine the contribution of mainstem rainbow, Westslope cutthroat, and bull trout spawners to the Idaho reach of the Kootenai River downstream of the Montana border. | a.Trap migrating juvenile trout. | 2002-2004 | $5,850 | |
b.Locate marked juvenile trout in Koot. | 2002-2004 | $5,850 | ||
c.Tag adults w/floy &/or radio tags | 2002-2004 | $5,850 | ||
d.Determine movement and spawn locatio | 2002-2004 | $5,850 | ||
e.Search for trout redds in KR river. | 2002-2004 | $5,850 | ||
f.Survey spawning habitat in KR river | 2002-2004 | $5,850 | ||
Obj 12) Enhance spawning habitat in the mainstem Kootenai R. and/or tributaries and evaluate. | a.Identify suitable areas for enhancement. | 2003-2004 | $0 | |
b.Identify suitable control areas in Koot R | 2003-2004 | $0 | ||
c.Exp.enhancement-spawn channels | 2003-2004 | $0 | ||
d.Sample outmigration for evaluation | 2003-2004 | $0 | ||
Obj 13) Large scale sampling, within two refernence reaches, to determine the pre-fertilization and post-fertilization status of the fish community, trophic structure, densities, standing stocks, and the population dynamics of salmonids. | a.Sample fish pop. in two reference reachs | 2002-2006 | $40,000 | |
b.Idaentyify, measure, weigh, and mark | 2002-2006 | $3,340 | ||
c.Estimate trophic structure of community | 2002-2006 | $3,340 | ||
d.Age&growth&relative w of salmonids. | 2002-2006 | $3,340 | ||
e.Conduct pop.est for salmonids. | 2002-2006 | $3,340 | ||
f.Esimate standing stock of salmonids | $3,340 | |||
Obj 14) Evaluate the potential to reduce the temperature of Deep Creek to develop a resident trout fishery. | a)Determine feasibility of cooling water. | 2004-2005 | $0 |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|---|---|---|
2) Test Null Hypothesis: survival of larval sturgeon released over sand substrate is higher than larvae released over cobble substrate. | 2002 | 2004 | $25,030 |
3) Determine how changes in Kootenay Lake elevation effects white sturgeon spawning location. Will cost share with USGS. | 2002 | 2003 | $126,587 |
4) Evaluate the use of artificial substrates and instream structures to improve white sturgeon egg and larval survival and relocate sturgeon spawning | 2003 | 2006 | $502,035 |
6) Test null hypothesis that high winter flows do not cause stress in burbot and impair reproductive fitness. | 2002 | 2004 | $10,609 |
7) Test null hypothesis under laboratory conditions that various flows and temperatures do not cause stress in burbot and impair reproductive fitness. | 2002 | 2003 | $30,900 |
8) Estimate the number of burbot from Bonners Ferry, ID, to Kootenay Lake, BC. | 2002 | 2006 | $17,237 |
9) Determine affective means of sampling larval burbot and white sturgeon. | 2002 | 2004 | $32,200 |
10) Conduct a sportfishery survey on the Kootenai River from the Montana border to Deep Creek to determine angler use, harvest, sprtfish catch, catch effort, and as part of Large Scale sampling to determine eventual benefits to fertilization. | 2002 | 2002 | $0 |
11) Determine the contribution of mainstem rainbow, Westslope cutthroat, and bull trout spawners to the Idaho reach of the Kootenai River downstream of the Montana border. | 2002 | 2004 | $144,612 |
12) Enhance spawning habitat in the mainstem Kootenai R. and/or tributaries and evaluate. | 2003 | 2004 | $152,440 |
13) Large scale sampling, within two refernence reaches, to determine the pre-fertilization and post-fertilization status of the fish community, trophic structure, densities, standing stocks, and the population dynamics of salmonids. | 2002 | 2006 | $244,328 |
14) Evaluate the potential to reduce the temperature of Deep Creek to develop a resident trout fishery. | 2004 | 2005 | $25,000 |
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
FY 2003 | FY 2004 | FY 2005 | FY 2006 |
---|---|---|---|
$538,814 | $417,137 | $298,391 | $280,819 |
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2002 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2002 cost | Subcontractor |
---|---|---|---|---|
Obj. 1) M&E experimental flows for sturgeon spawning and rearing, determine the minimum flow that will provide spawning and rearing habitat for Kootenai River white sturgeon and bring off a successful year class | a. Sample 50 adult sturgeon. | Ongoing | $81,170 | |
b.Tag 12 mature sturgeon w/transmitters. | Ongoing | $47,970 | ||
c.Determine response of sturgeon to flow. | Ongoing | $47,970 | ||
d.Measure physical habitat parameters. | Ongoing | $47,970 | ||
e.Measure egg deposition and habitat. | Ongoing | $47,970 | ||
f.Measure larval abundance. | Ongoing | $47,970 | ||
g.Measure fingerling and juv. abundance. | Ongoing | $47,970 | ||
h.Sample sturgeon in Kootenay Lake | Ongoing | $50,000 | Yes | |
Obj 15) M&E implementation of a recovery strategy for burbot as prescribed in the Recovery Strategy for burbot. | a.Enhancewith donar stock from DuncanL | Ongoing | $0 | |
b.Captive brood fich in Boundary&Smith | Ongoing | $0 |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|---|---|---|
1) M&E experimental flows for sturgeon spawning and rearing, determine the minimum flow that will provide spawning and rearing habitat for Kootenai River white sturgeon and bring off a successful year class | 2002 | 2006 | $1,622,868 |
15) M&E implementation of a recovery strategy for burbotas prescribed in the Recovery Strategy for burbot.. | 2003 | 2006 | $522,954 |
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
FY 2003 | FY 2004 | FY 2005 | FY 2006 |
---|---|---|---|
$518,990 | $534,560 | $550,597 | $567,115 |
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
Item | Note | FY 2002 cost |
---|---|---|
Personnel | FTE: Permanent and temporary staff | $240,100 |
Fringe | Permanent and temporary staff | $83,630 |
Supplies | $100,775 | |
Travel | $15,000 | |
Indirect | $174,986 | |
Capital | $30,000 | |
NEPA | 0 | $0 |
PIT tags | # of tags: 0 | $0 |
Subcontractor | British Columbia Ministry of Environment | $50,000 |
Subcontractor | Grduate student | $30,000 |
Subcontractor | US Geological Survey | $100,900 |
$825,391 |
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2002 cost | $825,391 |
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
Total FY 2002 budget request | $825,391 |
FY 2002 forecast from 2001 | $0 |
% change from forecast | 0.0% |
Reason for change in estimated budget
Recent siesmic and coring findings confirm the existence of spawning gravels in the same location projected by a lake elevation/white sturgeon spawning location model. The Kootenai River White Sturgeon Recovery Team needs vital information on the lake level and river interaction and this project has requested funding to the USGS to determine how the lake effects river velocities so remedial actions can proceed. In addtion, a creel survey requested in 2001 was delayed until 2002. The creel survey is a necessary component as a data base of the anglers catch and harvet pre-fertilization. The creel survey and a follow-up survey during implimentation of fertilization will allow IDFG and KTOI to measure the direct benefits to anglers from the experimental fertilization. Further, Large scale sampling is needed to develop a pre-fertilization data base of the fish community and vital statistics of salmonids to determine benefits of fertilization (scheduled in three years).
Cost sharing
Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
---|---|---|---|
US Geological Survey | Detailed anaysis of acoustic doppler current profiles and river gradient to determine Kootenay Lake and Kootenai River interface, how this has changed since construction of Libby Dam and lowering of Kootenay Lake, and prediction of preLibby interface. | $108,600 | cash |
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Fundable - no response required
Feb 9, 2001
Comment:
Fundable. This is a well-prepared proposal that addresses the deficiencies noted in the FY 2000 ISRP review. The technical and scientific background is complete, well organized by topic, and includes numerous pertinent references to the literature. The proposal links its work to all relevant plans, specifically including the FWP, Subbasin Summary, Idaho's regional plan, and the FWS's BiOp and Recovery Plan. There are specific linkages discussed with other projects, with the strong statement that this work is collaborative with others. The proposal showed strong indication of active cooperation between KTOI and BCME. There is a good listing and narrative showing the project history in terms of funding, studies, and principal results. The objectives and tasks are well organized and expressed. The methods are well described. Monitoring and evaluation constitute a large part of the program and the relevant objectives, tasks and methods are well presented. Facilities, equipment, and personnel are described and are appropriate for the work. Information transfer has been a strong feature of this project and its professional staff, and the proposal indicates that this information transfer will continue. There is less direct evidence in the proposal of basinwide coordination for sturgeon studies than is shown for Project 198806400. The benefit to fish and wildlife from this project should be high, with no negative side effects. However, the hypotheses for reduced recruitment are still evolving, and further consideration of alternative hypotheses seems desirable. For example, the actual physical processes involved with the relationship of spawning location to lake elevation were not discussed and could form the basis for additional hypotheses. The sturgeon program objectives seemed reasonable and would take advantage of "new" information to propose a test of the hypothesis that fish will spawn in the cobble at RM 242 if Kootenay Lake elevation is held high enough. However, this may be very expensive emergency room surgery without being sure of the exact causes of the patients' maladies. The stress assessment objective for burbot still shows no indication that it would be done by qualified personnel. These comments do not require a response, but are for the benefit of the investigators.Comment:
FY 02 Budget Review Comments: if the USGS project gets funded, the 100k subcontract in this proposal should be removed from the project.Comment:
if the USGS project gets funded, the 100k subcontract in this proposal should be removed from the project.Comment:
Fundable. This is a well-prepared proposal that addresses the deficiencies noted in the FY 2000 ISRP review. The technical and scientific background is complete, well organized by topic, and includes numerous pertinent references to the literature. The proposal links its work to all relevant plans, specifically including the FWP, Subbasin Summary, Idaho's regional plan, and the FWS's BiOp and Recovery Plan. There are specific linkages discussed with other projects, with the strong statement that this work is collaborative with others. The proposal showed strong indication of active cooperation between KTOI and BCME. There is a good listing and narrative showing the project history in terms of funding, studies, and principal results. The objectives and tasks are well organized and expressed. The methods are well described. Monitoring and evaluation constitute a large part of the program and the relevant objectives, tasks and methods are well presented. Facilities, equipment, and personnel are described and are appropriate for the work. Information transfer has been a strong feature of this project and its professional staff, and the proposal indicates that this information transfer will continue. There is less direct evidence in the proposal of basinwide coordination for sturgeon studies than is shown for Project 198806400. The benefit to fish and wildlife from this project should be high, with no negative side effects. However, the hypotheses for reduced recruitment are still evolving, and further consideration of alternative hypotheses seems desirable. For example, the actual physical processes involved with the relationship of spawning location to lake elevation were not discussed and could form the basis for additional hypotheses.The sturgeon program objectives seemed reasonable and would take advantage of "new" information to propose a test of the hypothesis that fish will spawn in the cobble at RM 242 if Kootenay Lake elevation is held high enough. However, this may be very expensive emergency room surgery without being sure of the exact causes of the patients' maladies. The stress assessment objective for burbot still shows no indication that it would be done by qualified personnel. These comments do not require a response, but are for the benefit of the investigators.
Comment:
This project should be funded as described. Bonneville has no additional comments on this project.Comment:
Comment:
Bonneville will fund... as recommended to meet requirements of the USFWS's BiOp as described in the Action Agencies 2002 Annual Implementation Plan.Comment:
Need to follow up with sponsor to confirm 05. Low accruals.Comment:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
expense
May 2005
FY05 NPCC start of year: | FY06 NPCC staff preliminary: | FY06 NPCC July draft start of year: |
$951,697 | $951,697 | $951,697 |
Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website