Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Reestablish Safe Access into Tributaries of the Yakima Subbasin |
| Proposal ID | 9100 |
| Organization | Yakama Indian Nation, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (YIN, WDFW) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator |
| Name | Scott Nicolai |
| Mailing address | P.O. Box 151 Toppenish, WA 98948 |
| Phone / email | 5098656262 / [email protected] |
| Manager authorizing this project | |
| Review cycle | FY 1999 |
| Province / Subbasin | Lower Mid-Columbia / Yakima |
| Short description | Reestablish passage over artificial barriers into ten tributaries, to regain over 100 miles of anadromous habitat. Protect reaccessed habitat through fencing, and property and conservation easement purchase. |
| Target species | |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 1999 cost |
|---|
| Personnel |
|
$62,904 |
| Fringe |
|
$25,767 |
| Supplies |
|
$32,600 |
| Capital |
|
$90,000 |
| Travel |
|
$3,336 |
| Indirect |
|
$57,086 |
| Subcontractor |
|
$125,108 |
| $396,801 |
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 1999 cost | $396,801 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 1999 budget request | $396,801 |
| FY 1999 forecast from 1998 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints: Time constraints include construction season limitations, contractor schedules, permitting delays, and coordinating with irrigators to avoid conflicts with irrigation deliveries. Time constraints include weather limitations. Time constraints include construction season limitations, contractor schedules permitting delays, and coordinating with irrigators to avoid conflicts with irrigation deliveries. Time constraints include land availability, potential limitations of conservation easement recipients, weather limitations on land appraisals, contractor scheduling (for fence construction).
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Recommendation:
Return to Sponsor for Revision
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Technical Issue: Same as original FY98 proposal – need to provide the additional information that was provided in FY98, plus an explanation of new work in FY99 resulting from FY98 funding.Technical Issue: Added a new objective for FY99, but not asking for additional money for that objective until FY2000 – is this objective already funded based on the 98 program?
Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Reduction due to cost sharing with WDFW
Recommendation:
Adequate
Date:
Jun 18, 1998
Comment:
This is a well-written proposal for needed work. The proposal does not describe whether the re-colonization will be natural or from artificial production. Monitoring and the expected benefits should be described in more detail.