FY 1999 proposal 198802200
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
| Title | Type |
|---|---|
| 198802200 Narrative | Narrative |
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Trap and Haul in the Umatilla and Walla Walla Basins |
| Proposal ID | 198802200 |
| Organization | Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation (CTUIR) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
| Name | Gary James |
| Mailing address | P.O. Box 638 Pendleton, OR 97801 |
| Phone / email | 5412764109 / [email protected] |
| Manager authorizing this project | |
| Review cycle | FY 1999 |
| Province / Subbasin | Lower Mid-Columbia / Umatilla |
| Short description | Operate passage facilities, flow enhancement measures, trap facilities and hauling equipment to maximize juvenile and adult migrant survival in Umatilla and Walla Walla basins. |
| Target species | |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
| RPA |
|---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
| Year | Accomplishment |
|---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 1999 cost |
|---|---|---|
| Personnel | $145,000 | |
| Fringe | $42,000 | |
| Supplies | $10,000 | |
| Operating | $20,000 | |
| Travel | $25,000 | |
| Indirect | $82,000 | |
| Subcontractor | $185,000 | |
| $509,000 | ||
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 1999 cost | $509,000 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 1999 budget request | $509,000 |
| FY 1999 forecast from 1998 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints: Incompletion of key passage or production components for the Walla Walla basin would reduce the effort required in that basin. Similarly, major milestones would be completion of these same key components. There are no major constraints or milestones which affect the Umatilla portion of the project.
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Comment:
Criteria 1: Technical Criteria - Incomplete: Need more details in methods. On page 9, paragraph 6, the proposal mentions project guidelines but doesn't specify what they are. Also on the top of page 10 in paragraph 1, the proposal refers to project methods in an annual report but doesn't describe them. The methods in that report should be included (at least enough of them to be able to allow the reader/reviewer to determine if the project is using sound protocols).
Criteria 2: Objectives Criteria - Yes
Criteria 3: Milestones Criteria - Yes
Criteria 4: Resources Criteria - Yes
Comment:
Reduction justification forthcomingISRP Review (ISRP 1998-1)
Inadequate proposal, adequate purpose as a set
Jun 18, 1998
Comment:
This project has been going on for almost 10 years, but little direct evidence is presented on how well it is working. It needs greater demonstration of the objectives and the benefits.NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
expense
May 2005
| FY05 NPCC start of year: | FY06 NPCC staff preliminary: | FY06 NPCC July draft start of year: |
| $362,164 | $362,164 | $362,164 |
Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website