FY 1999 proposal 199403300
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | The Fish Passage Center |
| Proposal ID | 199403300 |
| Organization | Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission (PSMFC) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator |
| Name | Michele Dehart, FPC & Pam Kahut, PSMFC |
| Mailing address | 2501 SW First Ave., Suite 230 Portland, OR 97201 |
| Phone / email | 5032304288 / [email protected] |
| Manager authorizing this project | |
| Review cycle | FY 1999 |
| Province / Subbasin | Systemwide / Systemwide |
| Short description | Provide the fishery agencies and tribes with technical expertise regarding hydrosystem operations, analysis of smolt monitoring data, for daily, weekly and monthly fish passage management decisions. |
| Target species | |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| 8401400 |
Smolt Monitoring - Federal |
Critical Component |
| 8712700 |
Smolt Monitoring by Non-Federal |
Critical Component |
| 9602000 |
1998 Hatchery PIT tag study |
Critical Component |
| 8332300 |
Smolt Condition & Arrival |
Critical Component |
| 9008000 |
PITAGIS |
Critical Component |
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 1999 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 1999 cost |
|---|
| Personnel |
|
$532,788 |
| Fringe |
|
$197,131 |
| Supplies |
Included with Operations & Maintenance |
$0 |
| Operating |
|
$167,964 |
| Capital |
|
$3,675 |
| Travel |
|
$20,992 |
| Indirect |
|
$137,831 |
| Subcontractor |
N/A |
$0 |
| $1,060,381 |
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 1999 cost | $1,060,381 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 1999 budget request | $1,060,381 |
| FY 1999 forecast from 1998 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints: None Known
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Recommendation:
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Criteria 1: Technical Criteria - Yes
Criteria 2: Objectives Criteria - Yes
Criteria 3: Milestones Criteria - Yes
Criteria 4: Resources Criteria - Incomplete: Need resumes of key personnel and description of FPC office to justify personnel budget item.
Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
May 13, 1998
Comment:
Recommendation:
Adequate
Date:
Jun 18, 1998
Comment:
The proposal draws criticism from ISRP reviewers on grounds that the proponents should link together all subprojects under an umbrella proposal such as this, but each major subproject should be justified in a separate proposal with principal investigator, budget, etc. One reviewer observes that the program is too complex to be adequately addressed in the present form and consequently the proposal is marginally acceptable. It is not clear that the most efficient relationship exists between this complex project and others such as Streamnet, PTAGIS, Federal and Non-Federal smolt monitoring, etc.
REVIEW:
NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
Funding category:
expense
Date:
May 2005
| FY05 NPCC start of year: | FY06 NPCC staff preliminary: | FY06 NPCC July draft start of year: |
| $1,302,904 |
$1,302,904 |
$1,302,904 |
Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website