FY 2000 proposal 20025
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Deschutes River Stray Summer Steelhead Assessment |
| Proposal ID | 20025 |
| Organization | Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator |
| Name | Tony Nigro |
| Mailing address | P.O. Box 59 Portland, OR 97207 |
| Phone / email | 5038725252 / [email protected] |
| Manager authorizing this project | |
| Review cycle | FY 2000 |
| Province / Subbasin | Mainstem/Systemwide / Systemwide |
| Short description | Review available information to determine the magnitude and cause of stray summer steelhead entering the Deschutes River, Oregon, and identify potential solutions. |
| Target species | Summer Steelhead |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| 8903500 |
Umatilla Hatchery O&M |
One potential source of stray fish |
| 8805302 |
Grande Ronde Satellite Facilities |
One potential source of stray fish |
| 8805301 |
Northeast Oregon Outplanting Facilities |
One potential source of stray fish |
|
Comprehensive Review of Columbia Basin Artificial Production |
Could help identify cause of stray problem. |
| 20511 |
Deschutes River Umbrella Proposal |
|
| 9404200 |
Trout Creek Habitat Restoration Project |
|
| 9303000 |
Buck Hollow Watershed Restoration Project |
|
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 2000 cost |
|---|
| Personnel |
|
$30,221 |
| Fringe |
|
$12,088 |
| Supplies |
|
$2,010 |
| Travel |
|
$3,900 |
| Indirect |
@ 35.5% |
$17,118 |
| $65,337 |
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 2000 cost | $65,337 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 2000 budget request | $65,337 |
| FY 2000 forecast from 1999 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
| BPA |
Stray Steelhead Assessment |
$65,337 |
unknown |
| ODFW |
Office space and equipment |
$10,000 |
unknown |
| ODFW |
Hatchery data retrieval |
$2,500 |
unknown |
| WDW |
Hatchery data retrieval |
$2,500 |
unknown |
| USFWS |
Hatchery data retrieval |
$2,500 |
unknown |
| IDFG |
Hatchery data retrieval |
$2,500 |
unknown |
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints: Project startup will be dependent upon selection of a qualified/experienced project leader.
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Recommendation:
Do not fund
Date:
Jun 15, 1999
Comment:
Recommendation:
Do not fund. Proposal was technically inadequate due to lack of methodological detail, but reviewers encourage resubmission of a more complete proposal next year.
Comments:
If done properly, this proposal offers the potential to meet an important biological need. The objectives are fairly clear, but technical details of the activities are inadequate and pose a challenge in establishing the dimensions of the task and whether or not one year and this budget are sufficient. Reviewers are left to speculate, then, if the proposal is based on sound scientific principles and if the objectives are fully defined. The proponents should offer more information on analytical methods and in describing individual tasks under objectives 1 and 2. Most are simply one sentence declaratives, e.g., "Determine the….." without adequate explanation. Why this activity is not being done already by some agency is unclear. The need for BPA funding should be more clearly established.
Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Aug 20, 1999
Comment:
Recommendation:
Date:
Aug 20, 1999
Comment:
Technical Criteria 1: Met? no - Need to provide more detail on how objectives will be accomplished.Programmatic Criteria 2: Met? yes -
Milestone Criteria 3: Met? yes -
Resource Criteria 4: Met? yes -
Recommendation:
Date:
Aug 20, 1999
Comment:
This project addresses a specific need identified for ESA.
Recommendation:
Do Not Fund
Date:
Mar 1, 2000
Comment:
[Decision made in 11-3-99 Council Meeting];