FY 2000 proposal 20139

Additional documents

TitleType
20139 Narrative Narrative
20139 Sponsor Response to the ISRP Response

Section 1. Administrative

Proposal titleWalla Walla River Fish Passage Operations
Proposal ID20139
OrganizationConfederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation (CTUIR)
Proposal contact person or principal investigator
NameGary A. James
Mailing addressP.O. Box 638 Pendleton, OR 97801
Phone / email5412764109 / [email protected]
Manager authorizing this project
Review cycleFY 2000
Province / SubbasinColumbia Plateau / Walla Walla
Short descriptionIncrease survival of migrating juvenile and adult salmon and summer steelhead in the Walla Walla Basin by operating passage facilities, trapping facilities, and transport equipment, to provide adequate passage conditions.
Target speciesSummer steelhead, spring chinook
Project location
LatitudeLongitudeDescription
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)

Sponsor-reported:

RPA

Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:

Reviewing agencyAction #BiOp AgencyDescription

Section 2. Past accomplishments

YearAccomplishment
1998 Provide Technical Input on Passage and Trapping Facility Designs

Section 3. Relationships to other projects

Project IDTitleDescription
8805302 NE Oregon Walla Walla Hatchery Facility After production begins, provide adequate passage for juveniles released and collect broodstock
9000501 Walla Walla Basin Natural Production M & E Provide passage for adults and juveniles to and from natural production areas and collect data on returning adults
9601100 Walla Walla Juvenile Screens and Traps (Submitted separately)
Walla Walla River Tributary Fish Passage
20139 Walla Walla Fish Passage Operations (Subject Proposal)

Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2000 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase

Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2000 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase

Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2000 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase

Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Task-based budget
ObjectiveTaskDuration in FYsEstimated 2000 costSubcontractor
Outyear objectives-based budget
ObjectiveStarting FYEnding FYEstimated cost
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase

Section 8. Estimated budget summary

Itemized budget
ItemNoteFY 2000 cost
Personnel $22,900
Fringe $6,900
Supplies $2,500
Operating $1,100
Travel $4,000
Indirect $12,600
Subcontractor $33,400
$83,400
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2000 cost$83,400
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds$0
Total FY 2000 budget request$83,400
FY 2000 forecast from 1999$0
% change from forecast0.0%
Cost sharing
OrganizationItem or service providedAmountCash or in-kind
Total project cost (including BPA portion) $0 unknown
Other budget explanation

Schedule Constraints: I Completion and funding of projects 9601100 and 9601200 listed in Section 3 under Umbrella proposals would significantly enhance and compliment the effectiveness of this project.


Reviews and recommendations

This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.

Recommendation:
Delay Funding
Date:
Jun 15, 1999

Comment:

Recommendation: Delay funding until detailed methods and site specific actions are provided and an independent comprehensive review of the Walla Walla program is done.

Comments: Although the reviewers don't doubt the lack of water in the Walla Walla, the specifics of the problem and the activity are poorly explained. What is this proposal about? What is the specific location of the collection facility and release cites? The watershed effort needs to address the lack of water as the primary limiting factor.


Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Aug 20, 1999

Comment:


Recommendation:
Date:
Aug 20, 1999

Comment:

Technical Criteria 1: Met? yes -

Programmatic Criteria 2: Met? no - In background section it is stated that this project was began in 1998. Why is it proposed as a new project for 2000?

Milestone Criteria 3: Met? no - Objectives are not clearly defined.

Resource Criteria 4: Met? yes -


Recommendation:
Date:
Aug 20, 1999

Comment:

General tightening. Costs reduced as a result of improved efficiencies.
Recommendation:
Fund to maintain existing operations
Date:
Oct 29, 1999

Comment:

Fund to maintain existing operations. See programmatic recommendation for Umatilla and Walla Walla under project 8903500. Again, the problem in the Walla Walla River is lack of flow and the presence of physical structures that impede passage of fish. There is a need to continue this project until some other solution, if any, can be found.
Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Nov 8, 1999

Comment:


Recommendation:
Fund
Date:
Mar 1, 2000

Comment:

[Decision made in 11-3-99 Council Meeting]; Address ISRP comments in BPA contract