FY 2000 proposal 198805305
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
| Title | Type |
|---|---|
| 198805305 Narrative | Narrative |
| 198805305 Sponsor Response to the ISRP | Response |
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Northeast Oregon Hatcheries Planning and Implementation - ODFW |
| Proposal ID | 198805305 |
| Organization | Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
| Name | Bruce Eddy |
| Mailing address | 107 20th St. LaGrande, OR 97850 |
| Phone / email | 5419632138 / [email protected] |
| Manager authorizing this project | |
| Review cycle | FY 2000 |
| Province / Subbasin | Blue Mountain / Grande Ronde |
| Short description | Work with comanagers to develop endemic broodstocks for supplementation of spring chinook salmon in the Grande Ronde basin and continue planning for additional anadromous salmonid enhancement programs in the Grande Ronde, Imnaha, and WallaWalla basins. |
| Target species | Spring Chinook, Fall Chinook, Steelhead, Coho |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
| RPA |
|---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
| Year | Accomplishment |
|---|---|
| 1997 | Comanagers installed temporary adult collection facilities in upper Grande Ronde River, Catherine Creek, and Lostine River and began collecting adult chinook. ODFW spawned and reared progeny of adults collected from Lostine River. |
| 1998 | Completed long-term management plan for Grande Ronde endemic spring chinook program and applied for modification of ESA Section 10 Permit No. 1011. Plan was developed cooperatively with NPT, CTUIR, and USFWS. |
| 1998 | Completed designs for new adult collection and juvenile acclimation facilities in upper Grande Ronde River, Catherine Creek, and Lostine River. Received approval to begin construction, secured landowner agreements, and will begin construction in winter. |
| 1998 | Comanagers operated temporary adult collection facilities in upper Grande Ronde River, Catherine Creek, and Lostine River. |
| 1998 | Completed a long-term management plan for research and enhancement of Imnaha River chinook and applied for new ESA Section 10 Permit. The plan was developed cooperatively with NPT and USFWS. |
| 1998 | Reviewed drafts of master plan documents prepared by or for NPT and provided comments to NPT. Wrote a captive broodstock alternative and submitted it to NPT for inclusion in Imnaha master plan. |
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 8805301 | Northeast Oregon Hatchery Master Plan, NPT | Cooperative Project |
| 8805302 | Plan, Site, Design & Construct NEOH Hatchery, CTUIR | Cooperative Project |
| 9800702 | Grande Ronde Supplementation - O&M/M&E, NPT | Implementation of GRESP |
| 9800703 | Conduct Satellite Facility O&M and Program M&E for GRESP, CTUIR | Implementation of GRESP |
| 9801006 | Captive Broodstock Artificial Propagation, NPT | Implementation of GRESP |
| 9600800 | PATH/ELH | Provide information for M&E |
| 9202601 | Grande Ronde Model Watershed - Project Planning Support | |
| 9402700 | Grande Ronde Model Watershed Habitat Projects | |
| 8909600 | Genetics of Snake River Salmon and Steelhead, NMFS | Genetics monitoring for GRESP and information needed for steelhead planning. Comanagers of GRESP will collect samples during field activities |
| 20512 | Grande Ronde River Subbasin | |
| 8805305 | Northeast Oregon Hatcheries Planning and Implementation - ODFW | |
| 9202604 | Spring Chinook Salmon Early Life History Evaluation | |
| 9405400 | Bull Trout Genetics, Habitat Needs, Life History, etc. | |
| 9801001 | Grande Ronde Basin Spring Chinook Captive Broodstock Program | |
| 8402500 | Protect and Enhance Fish Habitat in Grande Ronde Basin Streams |
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 2000 cost |
|---|---|---|
| Personnel | Approximately 4 FTE | $106,923 |
| Fringe | 36% for permanents, 45% for seasonals | $44,973 |
| Supplies | $61,220 | |
| Operating | $56,600 | |
| Capital | Facility improvements at Lookingglass Hatchery to accommodate GRESP | $152,000 |
| Travel | $21,400 | |
| Indirect | 35.5% | $157,306 |
| Subcontractor | Steelhead facility review | $60,000 |
| $660,422 | ||
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 2000 cost | $660,422 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 2000 budget request | $660,422 |
| FY 2000 forecast from 1999 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lower Snake River Compensation Plan | Funding for base program in Grande Ronde and Imnaha basins | $1,500,000 | unknown |
| ODFW | District biologists' participation in planning and implementation | $70,000 | unknown |
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints: None
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Comment:
Recommendation: Do not fund. The proposal is not scientifically sound; it lacks adequate detail on rationale and methods.Comments: This proposal is from ODFW to participate in planning and implementation of NEOH, particularly for spring chinook and possibly steelhead, coho, and sockeye. It is stated that planning might also cover species other than chinook; this is disturbingly vague. It would be desirable to have an integrated master plan for all of the species to improve efficiencies and reduce overlap. This would seem to be a role of ODFW.
Although this proposal fits under the umbrella for spring chinook, conversion to endemic summer steelhead broodstocks represents a major component of the project. Monitoring includes assessment of the effects of the program on spawner distribution, survival, and behavior; contribution of hatchery adults to spawning; and progeny-to-parent ratios. Genetic and life-history characteristics of supplemented and non-supplemented populations in the basin and the hatchery will also be evaluated. Assessment of viral, bacterial, fungal, and parasitic agents will occur in natural spawning areas and hatcheries. Additionally, it appears that the proposers are introducing conventional "enhancement" production along with the openly proposed "supplementation."
The proposal has many weaknesses, failing to provide needed detail and justification for the project. The methods are only superficially described. The methods sections refer to documents that purportedly describe methodologies and justification for activities associated with the program, but details were entirely lacking so quality of the approach could not be assessed. Information on monitoring the project to evaluate its success was vague. What methods and criteria will be used to determine success or failure? The proposal has little detail on either monitoring and evaluation or "adaptive management". Monitoring components outlined in this proposal should be associated with milestones and summarized in previous accomplishments. The reviewers conclude that the proposal is of questionable benefit to fish.
The budget gives no defense of personnel requirements or capital costs. What will the 4 FTEs be doing? Capital costs "for facilities we expect will be needed" are not justified (the unexplained anticipated need does not provide rationale or justification for such expenditures). Additionally, the supplies budget is large and inadequately justified.
Comment:
Comment:
Criteria all: Met? Yes -Comment:
Fund in part. Fund the spring chinook Grande Ronde and Imnaha objectives, which involve some capital modifications to Lookingglass Hatchery. Do not fund the reintroduction efforts or efforts to use local endangered stocks to support harvest. See project 8805301.Comment:
Comment:
(3). Northeast Oregon Hatcheries Planning And Implementation - ODFW, Project ID #8805305, FY00 CBFWA Rec. $226,000.Description/Background: ODFW's primary objective is to provide timely and effective input to NPT and CTUIR on development of Master Plans for Imnaha, Grande Ronde and Walla Walla Basins.
ISRP Review: Fund in part. Fund the spring chinook Grande Ronde and Imnaha objectives, which involve some capital modifications to Lookingglass Hatchery. Do not fund the reintroduction efforts or efforts to use local endangered stocks to support harvest. See project 8805301.
Discussion and Council Recommendations: Of the $226,000 CBFWA recommended funding level, approximately $45,000 is directly allocated to master plan development (Objective 1). Lookinglass improvements should not be funded prior to master plan development and approval. Please see recommendations for item (2)(above). The operations and maintenance portion of existing program should continue to receive sufficient funding in the interim.
Comment:
[Decision made in 12-7-99 Council Meeting]; Fund completion of master plan and 3-step 4/15/00, remainder as placeholder. (Funding for project #199800704)NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
capital
May 2005
| FY05 NPCC start of year: | FY06 NPCC staff preliminary: | FY06 NPCC July draft start of year: |
| $69,000 | $20,000 | $20,000 |
Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website