FY 2000 proposal 199000500
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
| Title | Type |
|---|---|
| 199000500 Narrative | Narrative |
| 199000500 Sponsor Response to the ISRP | Response |
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Umatilla Hatchery Monitoring and Evaluation |
| Proposal ID | 199000500 |
| Organization | Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
| Name | Richard Carmichael |
| Mailing address | 211 Inlow Hall, EOU, 1410 “L” Avenue LaGrande, OR 97850 |
| Phone / email | 5419623777 / [email protected] |
| Manager authorizing this project | |
| Review cycle | FY 2000 |
| Province / Subbasin | Columbia Plateau / Umatilla |
| Short description | Evaluate juvenile rearing, marking, tagging, survival, stock life history, fish health, mass marking, straying, sport fishing and catch contribution for salmon and steelhead reared in oxygen supplemented and standard raceways at Umatilla Hatchery. |
| Target species | Spring Chinook Salmon, Fall Chinook Salmon, Summer Steelhead |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
| RPA |
|---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
| Year | Accomplishment |
|---|---|
| 1996 | Completed tagging, growth, and juvenile migration monitoring for five broods of subyearling fall chinook salmon (CHF0) reared in Michigan (MI) and Oregon (OR) raceways; coded-wire-tag (CWT) recovery from adults has been completed for two broods. |
| 1998 | Completed tagging, growth, and juvenile migration monitoring for two broods of CHF0 reared at three different densities; CWT recovery is incomplete for all broods. |
| 1998 | Completed tagging and juvenile migration monitoring for two broods of yearling fall chinook salmon (CHF1) reared in MI and OR raceways at Umatilla Hatchery and seven broods reared at other hatcheries; CWT recovery is incomplete for all broods. |
| 1998 | Completed seven years of marking and wire-tagging fall chinook salmon (all rearing strategies) to monitor straying rates into Snake River. |
| 1998 | Completed marking and wire-tagging of three broods of CHF0 to determine effects of mark and tag on smolt-to-adult survival; CWT recovery was completed in 1998. |
| 1998 | Completed tagging, growth, and juvenile migration monitoring for three broods of subyearling spring salmon (CHS0) reared in MI and/or OR raceways and released in the spring; CWT recovery for two broods was completed in 1998. |
| 1998 | Completed tagging and juvenile migration monitoring for three broods of fall-released (CHS0) reared at Umatilla and Bonneville hatcheries; CWT recovery for the first brood was completed in 1998. |
| 1998 | Completed tagging and juvenile migration monitoring for three broods of yearling spring chinook salmon (CHS1) reared in MI and OR raceways and released in the spring; CWT recovery for the first brood was completed in 1998. |
| 1998 | Completed tagging and juvenile migration monitoring for five broods of spring-released CHS1 reared concurrently at Umatilla Hatchery and Bonneville or Carson or Little White Salmon hatcheries; CWT recovery for one brood was completed in 1998. |
| 1998 | Completed tagging, growth, and juvenile migration monitoring for seven broods of steelhead (STS) reared in MI raceways; CWT recovery for three broods was completed in 1998. |
| 1998 | Completed seven years of weekly water quality monitoring in MI and OR raceways associated with varying fish production strategies. |
| 1998 | Completed six years of salmon and steelhead creel surveys and harvest estimates for Umatilla River sport fishery. |
| 1998 | Completed six years of Hatchery Fish Production planning and coordination activities for Umatilla Basin. |
| 1998 | Completed six years of fish health and disease monitoring for fish released in the Umatilla River. |
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 8903500 | Umatilla Hatchery O&M | Rearing facility for test fish. |
| 8343500 | Umatilla Satellit Facilities O&M | Rearing and acclimation sites. |
| 8802200 | Umatilla Fish Passage Operations | This project provides low water passage for fish in the Umatilla River monitors fish passage facility operation, and collects information on adult fish trapped at river mile 3.0. |
| 843600 | Umatilla Fish Passage Facility O&M | Coordination |
| 871001 | Enhance Anadromous Fish Habitat | Information exchange |
| 8902401 | Umatilla RiverJuvenile Salmonid Outmigration and Survival M&E | |
| 9000501 | Umatilla River Natural Production M&E | |
| 8343500 | Umatilla Hatchery Satellite Facilities O&M | |
| 8903500 | Umatilla Hatchery O&M | |
| 20516 | Umatilla Subbasin |
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 2000 cost |
|---|---|---|
| Personnel | costs are for FY99 | $228,393 |
| Fringe | costs are for FY99 | $85,321 |
| Supplies | costs are for FY99 | $176,746 |
| Capital | costs are for FY99 | $13,256 |
| PIT tags | 10,000 | $29,000 |
| Travel | costs are for FY99 | $15,550 |
| Indirect | costs are for FY99 | $173,322 |
| Other | costs are for FY99 | $0 |
| $721,588 | ||
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 2000 cost | $721,588 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 2000 budget request | $721,588 |
| FY 2000 forecast from 1999 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints: Hatchery water shortages and low egg availability may restrict the number of experiments conducted each year. Risks to Snake River stocks are unknown. Poor adult returns and low tag recoveries may necessitate additional releases.
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Fund in part at reduced level
Jun 15, 1999
Comment:
Recommendation: Fund in part at reduced level. Incorporate internal hatchery monitoring into routine operations. Establish termination dates for some proceduresComments: Enough information now exists to make a decision about oxygen supplementation (Michigan raceways) without any further studies. There comes a time to make a decision. The monitoring and evaluation procedures described within the hatchery are routine, and ought to be a part of normal operations (e.g. monitor hatching success, growth, fish health, DO and temperature). The hatchery personnel should be collecting the information and a regionally coordinated body should be evaluating the data. The number of full time personnel requested in this proposal seems high. The Michigan raceway study takes one-third of the project budget and offers to produce little or no additional information that would affect a decision. Straying rates of these hatchery fish ought to be discussed. It is not clear that "acclimation" is accomplishing its objective; perhaps alternatives should be explored or acclimation omitted. The level of proposed field monitoring seems high. Standardized procedures should be established that are coordinated regionwide. The analysis needs to be tied to a decision analysis framework that addresses both naturally produced and hatchery fish.
Comment:
Comment:
Technical Criteria 1: Met? yes -Programmatic Criteria 2: Met? yes - Well prepared.
Milestone Criteria 3: Met? yes -
Resource Criteria 4: Met? yes -
Comment:
Reduce Objectives 10 & 11 (M&E). Low priority objectives were reduced or eliminated. General reduction in the scope of the project. Evaluation may change after decision in US v OR.Comment:
Fund existing activities. See programmatic recommendation for Umatilla and Walla Walla under project 8903500. Reviewers noted that a thorough response was provided that added to the justification for this work. However, an ability to detect a difference in raceway performance with respect to improving survival remains doubtful due to the variable nature of returns and uncertainties in survival estimates. Differences would have to be very large to be detectable.Comment:
Comment:
[Decision made in 11-3-99 Council Meeting]; Address ISRP comments in BPA contractNW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
expense
May 2005
| FY05 NPCC start of year: | FY06 NPCC staff preliminary: | FY06 NPCC July draft start of year: |
| $572,848 | $572,848 | $572,848 |
Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website