FY 2002 Columbia Plateau proposal 25101
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
Title | Type |
---|---|
25101 Narrative | Narrative |
25101 Sponsor Response to the ISRP | Response |
25101 Powerpoint Presentation | Powerpoint Presentation |
Columbia Plateau: Columbia Lower Middle Subbasin Map with BPA Fish & Wildlife Projects | Subbasin Map |
Columbia Plateau: Columbia Lower Middle Subbasin Map with BPA Fish & Wildlife Projects | Subbasin Map |
Section 1. Administrative
Proposal title | Use of Mainstem Habitats by Juvenile Pacific Lamprey (Lampetra tridentata)* |
Proposal ID | 25101 |
Organization | Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) |
Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
Name | Dennis Dauble |
Mailing address | PO Box 999 Richland, WA 99352 |
Phone / email | 5093763631 / [email protected] |
Manager authorizing this project | |
Review cycle | Columbia Plateau |
Province / Subbasin | Columbia Plateau / Mainstem Columbia |
Short description | Characterize the use of main-stem riverine habitats by juvenile Pacific lamprey and use this information to refine restoration strategies within the Columbia River basin |
Target species | Pacific lamprey |
Project location
Latitude | Longitude | Description |
---|---|---|
46.6708 | -119.4325 | Hanford Reach |
46.75 | -120 | |
46.23 | -119 | Lower Snake |
46.67 | -117.43 |
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
RPA |
---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Year | Accomplishment |
---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Project ID | Title | Description |
---|---|---|
9402600 | Pacific Lamprey Research & Restoration | The CTUIR will use our information to enhance restoration strategy planning for Pacific lamprey. |
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2002 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2002 cost | Subcontractor |
---|---|---|---|---|
1. Identify habitat use areas for the Hanford Reach | a. Develop sampling design from existing physical data sets | 1 | $10,000 | |
b. Survey sites using electroshocking equipment | 1 | $66,638 | ||
c. Analyze data and report | 1 | $12,600 |
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
FY 2003 | FY 2004 |
---|---|
$120,923 | $84,035 |
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2002 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2002 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
Item | Note | FY 2002 cost |
---|---|---|
Personnel | FTE: 1.64 | $24,264 |
Fringe | $8,570 | |
Supplies | $529 | |
Travel | $1,313 | |
Indirect | $46,820 | |
Capital | $0 | |
NEPA | $0 | |
Other | $0 | |
PIT tags | # of tags: | $0 |
Subcontractor | $7,742 | |
$89,238 |
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2002 cost | $89,238 |
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
Total FY 2002 budget request | $89,238 |
FY 2002 forecast from 2001 | $0 |
% change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
---|
Other budget explanation
Subcontract costs are for student intern.
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Fundable only if response is adequate
Jun 15, 2001
Comment:
Fundable if an adequate response is given to the ISRP's concerns. This is a short but well-prepared proposal by a qualified group with the required expertise, experience and equipment. The proposal would examine the use of the mainstem Columbia River by juvenile Pacific lamprey. They intend to conduct the study in the Hanford Reach and in the tailrace of four Columbia and Snake River dams. The study is based on a presumption that declining runs of lamprey were caused by degraded river conditions. They intend to classify habitat types in these reaches, electrofish to find which habitat types lamprey are using, and use these data to locate other such sites in the system. These data will be used to project where restoration activities (undefined, and in need of clarification) may be useful.
Reasons for the decline of lamprey are unknown. However, a review of previous investigations in the mainstem must contain information on amnocoete distribution and abundance in the past - this can not be the first time an electroshocker passed through the area? That review and data should be presented. For this study, relating abundance to habitat features in a multi-variate statistical analysis is difficult if not subject to misinterpretation where there are large patches of vacant habitat due to lack of recruitment, i.e., the current situation.
If there is not existing data, the proposal should be written to respond to the absence of information regarding use of these mainstem habitats by juvenile lamprey, and its potential importance for future fish and habitat managers.
Some potential habitat in the mainstem will be very difficult to sample for juvenile lamprey. How will the investigators ensure that their sampling will provide a legitimate basis for excluding some habitat types as of low importance for lamprey?
Presumably the investigators are participants in the Lamprey Working Group, and they are involved in regular discussions with others working on lamprey projects in the Basin such as work to assess juvenile lamprey distribution and abundance in the Deschutes River?
The proposal seems to be for three years, but budget request is for one year. The budget that is presented includes funds for a sub-contract the purpose of which is not obvious.
Please respond to general ISRP comments on this set of Lamprey projects provided above.
Comment:
Comment:
Fundable. The response adequately addressed the ISRP's concerns. This is a short but well-prepared proposal by a qualified group with the required expertise, experience and equipment. The proposal would examine the use of the mainstem Columbia River by juvenile Pacific lamprey. They intend to conduct the study in the Hanford Reach and in the tailrace of four Columbia and Snake River dams. The study is based on a presumption that declining runs of lamprey were caused by degraded river conditions. They intend to classify habitat types in these reaches, electrofish to find which habitat types lamprey are using, and use these data to locate other such sites in the system. These data will be used to project where restoration activities (undefined, and in need of clarification) may be useful.See ISRP detailed comments on Lamprey projects
Comment:
Statement of Potential Biological Benefit to ESUN/A
Comments
Already ESA Req? N/A
Biop? no
Comment:
Comment:
Comment: