FY 2003 Lower Columbia proposal 31031
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
| Title | Type |
|---|---|
| Nicolai-Wickiup Watershed Assessment, Appendix A: History of the Nicolai-Wickiup Watershed | Narrative Attachment |
| Skipanon Watershed Assessment, Appendix A: History of the Skipanon River Watershed | Narrative Attachment |
| Youngs Bay Watershed Assessment, Appendix A: History of Youngs Bay Watershed | Narrative Attachment |
| Nicolai-Wickiup Watershed Assessment | Narrative Attachment |
| Skipanon Watershed Assessment | Narrative Attachment |
| Youngs Bay Watershed Assessment | Narrative Attachment |
| Grant Materials: 2000 Council Application | Narrative Attachment |
| Grant Materials: 2002 Project Budget | Narrative Attachment |
| Grant Materials: Section III, Watershed Council Support Projects | Narrative Attachment |
| Grant Materials: Coordinator's Work Plan | Narrative Attachment |
| 31031 Narrative | Narrative |
| 31031 Powerpoint Presentation | Powerpoint Presentation |
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Clatsop County Fisheries Restoration Project |
| Proposal ID | 31031 |
| Organization | Clatsop County's Clatsop Economic Development Council Fisheries Project (CEDC) (CEDC Fisheries) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
| Name | Tod Jones |
| Mailing address | 2001 Marine Dr. Rm. 253 Astoria, Or. 97103 |
| Phone / email | 5033256452 / [email protected] |
| Manager authorizing this project | Tod Jones |
| Review cycle | Lower Columbia |
| Province / Subbasin | Lower Columbia / Columbia Lower |
| Short description | Recolonize eight Columbia River tributaries in Clatsop County with appropriate stocks of winter run coho and chum salmon using otolith-marked eyed eggs out-planted in natal streams where remnant runs exist, or using introduced stocks when necessary. |
| Target species | Chum and winter run coho |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 46.0909 | -123.7441 | Klaskanine Hatchery |
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
| RPA |
|---|
| 9.6.4.3 |
| 9.6.5.3.4 |
| 9.6.5 |
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
| Year | Accomplishment |
|---|
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 190002134 | Select Area Fisheries Evaluation | Sharing staff to conduct stock assessments and habitat analysis as well as captive broodstock rearing. |
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2003 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Stock assessment in eight streams of Clatsop County. | a. Weekly stream surveys in Lewis & Clark, North Fork Klaskanine, South Fork Klaskanine, Bear Creek, Ferris Creek, Little Creek, Big Creek, and Gnat Creek to identify incidence of non-hatchery winter coho and chum spawners. | 2002-2003 | $7,700 | |
| 2. Assessment of spawning and rearing habitat | a. Survey and map eight targeted streams to evaluate and enumerate spawning gravel and rearing for habitat for both species | 2002-2003 | $9,900 | |
| 3. Evaluation of sub-surface | a. Hyporheic zone analysis using Salmon Egg Planting Device and freeze core sampling to quantify composition of cobble, gravel, and organic and inorganic fines | 2002-2003 | $16,500 | Yes |
| 4. Identify appropriate stocks for use as brood stock | a. Consultation with NMFS and ODFW after stock assessments to determine if natal stocks are present or if introduced from outside each watershed | 2003 | $1,650 | |
| 5. Central incubation facility | a. Design water filtration system to provide incubation water with particulates not to exceed 2 microns. | 2003 | $5,500 | |
| b. Design isolation incubation to separate gametes from each stream | 2003 | $5,500 | ||
| c. Design temperature control system to affect otolith marking | 2003 | $5,500 | ||
| 6. Adult and juvenile retention | a. Design weir and trap system to hold adults for ripening and spawning | 2003 | $5,500 | |
| b. Design and identify locations for out-migrant fry/smolts for enumeration and data capture | 2003 | $5,500 | ||
| 7. Captive brood program | a. Rear 3,000 coho smolts to gravid adults in two estuary sites and one fresh water site, using South Fork Klaskanine early-run stocks. | 2002-2003 | $5,500 | |
| b. Evaluate strategies and sites for future use | 2002-2003 | $5,500 |
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2003 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5. Central incubation facility | a. Install water filtration system | 2003 | $35,000 | Yes |
| b. Install isolation mist incubation | 2003 | $20,000 | Yes | |
| c. Acquire egg transport and handling equipment | 2003 | $50,000 | Yes | |
| d. Install thermal units for otolith marking | 2003 | $25,000 | Yes | |
| 6. Adult and juvenile retention | a. Install weirs and holding pens in four streams | 2003 | $50,000 | Yes |
| b. Install juvenile traps in four streams | 2003 | $50,000 | Yes | |
| 7. Captive brood program | a. Install two 40'X40' HDPE net pens with barrier nets in estuary sites | 2003 | $70,000 | Yes |
| b. Install raceways at CEDC South Fork hatchery for fresh water system | 2003 | $70,000 | Yes |
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2003 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7. Captive brood program | a. Continued rearing and evaluation of coho and chum brood as appropriate | 2004-2007 | $0 | |
| 8. Brood stock collection | a. capture adults at weirs for gamete collection | 2003-2006 | $2,200 | |
| b. Collect gametes and transport to central incubation facility for fertilization, incubation and otolith marking | 2003-2006 | $4,400 | ||
| c. Shock and remove dead eggs at eye stage | 2003-2006 | $4,400 | ||
| 9. Out-planting eggs | a. Transport eyed eggs to natal stream for planting | 2004-2007 | $0 | |
| b. Plant eyed eggs with Salmon Planting Device | 2004-2007 | $0 | ||
| c. Cover redds with vexar coated wire mesh to prevent superimpostion or scouring | 2004-2007 | $0 | ||
| d. Monitor swim-up fry using fish netting | 2004-2007 | $0 | ||
| e. Evaluate abundance and k-factor | 2004-2007 | $0 |
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7. Captive brood program | 2004 | 2007 | $200,000 |
| 8. Brood Stock collection | 2004 | 2006 | $30,000 |
| 9. Out-planting eggs | 2004 | 2007 | $60,000 |
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
| FY 2004 | FY 2005 | FY 2006 | FY 2007 |
|---|---|---|---|
| $75,000 | $75,000 | $75,000 | $65,000 |
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2003 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10. Monitor rearing and outmigration | a. Quarterly surveys to monitor abundance and k-factor of coho fingerlings | 2004-2007 | $0 | |
| b. Evaluate chum outmigration through juvenile trap enumeration and k-factor | 2004-2007 | $0 | ||
| 11. Ongoing evaluation | a. Data collection and reporting from each life stage | 2004-2007 | $0 | |
| b. Consultation with NMFS and ODFW | 2004-2007 | $0 | ||
| c. Project adjustments as needed | 2004-2007 | $0 |
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10. Monitor rearing and outmigration | 2004 | 2007 | $60,000 |
| 11. Ongoing evaluation | 2004 | 2007 | $12,000 |
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
| FY 2004 | FY 2005 | FY 2006 | FY 2007 |
|---|---|---|---|
| $18,000 | $18,000 | $18,000 | $18,000 |
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 2003 cost |
|---|---|---|
| Personnel | FTE: 1.0 | $36,000 |
| Fringe | 50% | $18,000 |
| Supplies | $8,500 | |
| Indirect | 10% | $7,750 |
| Capital | 0 | $370,000 |
| Subcontractor | $15,000 | |
| $455,250 | ||
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 2003 cost | $455,250 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 2003 budget request | $455,250 |
| FY 2003 forecast from 2002 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Reason for change in estimated budget
NA
Reason for change in scope
NA
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| CEDC Fisheries | personal services, stream surveys, travel | $20,000 | in-kind |
| Bio-Oregon, Inc. | personal services, brood stock feed | $25,000 | in-kind |
| Familian Industrial Plastics | net-pen flotation | $2,500 | in-kind |
| Willamette Industries | To be determined | $0 | cash |
| Local commercial fishermen | labor | $5,000 | in-kind |
Other budget explanation
Capital costs for the project are only preliminary and need refinement once results of winter surveys are complete.We will be seeking private and federal founding for out-year budgets.
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Recommendation:
Do not fund - no response required
Do not fund - no response required
Date:
Mar 1, 2002
Mar 1, 2002
Comment:
Not fundable. This proposal would recolonize 8 Columbia River tributaries in Clatsop County with winter-run coho and chum. It will initiate a captive brood stock program to evaluate sites for rearing coho. The primary strategy will be to out-plant eyed eggs from a central incubation facility (Klaskanine Hatchery) to various reaches of selected streams. Otolith mass marking will be done during early incubation. Egg planting will be done using a method developed in Alaska in the 1980's. Eight Clatsop County streams will be surveyed in 2002-2003 for remnants of late-run coho and chum. Streams will also be evaluated for the suitability as spawning and rearing habitat. The progression of outplanted eggs will be monitored. The proposal seeks funding from federal, state and private sources. The BPA request is for 50%.Young's Bay historically supported a strong population of chum, and there is likely some value in getting chum into these systems, but this proposal is not adequate to the research need.
The salmon egg planting device (gas powered water pump pushing water through pipe into gravel, eyed eggs introduced into stream) was developed and used with mixed success in Alaska in the 1980's. None of the performance history of the device is reviewed in the proposal.
The objectives and tasks are presented in abbreviated form. The proposal is vague about the techniques of egg planting and of thermal marking. The proposal says nothing about the methods of recovery of marked fish and includes no budget for thermal marking. Even if the number of embryos is modest the cost of energy (fuel oil) for marking will not be small.
The captive broodstock part of the project is poorly developed. No one has ever been successful rearing chum salmon to maturity in captivity, and the proposal does not suggest how the proponents intend to do it. The fish are susceptible to vibrio.
Comment:
This project aggressively relies on unproven technologies.Comment:
Not fundable. This proposal would recolonize 8 Columbia River tributaries in Clatsop County with winter-run coho and chum and would initiate a captive brood stock program to evaluate sites for rearing coho. Young's Bay historically supported a strong population of chum, and there is likely some value in getting chum into these systems, but this proposal is not adequate to the research need. The salmon egg planting device (gas powered water pump pushing water through pipe into gravel, eyed eggs introduced into stream) was developed and used with mixed success in Alaska in the 1980's. None of the performance history of the device is reviewed in the proposal. The objectives and tasks are presented only in abbreviated form. The proposal is vague about the techniques of egg planting and of thermal marking. The proposal says nothing about the methods of recovery of marked fish and includes no budget for thermal marking. Even if the number of embryos is modest the cost of energy (fuel oil) for marking will not be small. The captive broodstock part of the project is poorly developed. No one has ever been successful rearing chum salmon to maturity in captivity, and the proposal does not suggest how the proponents intend to do it.Comment:
Statement of Potential Biological Benefit to ESUIf successful, could restore Columbia River Chum salmon to historical spawning areas in Columbia County, OR.
Comments
Captive brood techniques uncertain for chum and coho (have chum or coho ever been raised to adult stage?) Question whether the stock of coho that are part of the captive brood project are an early run hatchery stock or a later run wild component.
Already ESA Req? No
Biop? No
Comment:
Recommend not funding at this time. Consideration of NMFS approved Safety Net projects should await results of the planning phase of the SNAPP process.Comment: