FY 2000 proposal 198343600
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
| Title | Type |
|---|---|
| 198343600 Narrative | Narrative |
| 198343600 Sponsor Response to the ISRP | Response |
Section 1. Administrative
| Proposal title | Umatilla Passage Facilities O & M |
| Proposal ID | 198343600 |
| Organization | Westland Irrigation District (WID) |
| Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
| Name | Darryl Burham |
| Mailing address | P.O. Box 416 Stanfield, OR 97875 |
| Phone / email | 5414493272 / [email protected] |
| Manager authorizing this project | |
| Review cycle | FY 2000 |
| Province / Subbasin | Columbia Plateau / Umatilla |
| Short description | Maximize the survival of migrating juvenile and adult salmon and summer steelhead in the Umatilla Basin by operating and maintaining passage facilities, trapping facilities, spawning facilities and acclimation facilities according to agency guidelines. |
| Target species | Coho, Fall Chinook, Spring Chinook, Summer Steelhead |
Project location
| Latitude | Longitude | Description |
|---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
| RPA |
|---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
| Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
|---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
| Year | Accomplishment |
|---|---|
| 1998 | Maintenance of trapping facilities |
| 1998 | Maintenance of spawning facilities |
| 1998 | Operation and Maintenance of Juvenile bypasses and Adult Ladders |
| 1998 | Maintenance of Acclimation Sites |
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
| Project ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 8403300 | Umatilla Hatchery O & M | Provide adequate passage for juveniles released by maintaining and operating passage facilities. |
| 8343500 | Umatilla Hatchery Satellite Facilities O & M | Provide adequate passage for juneniles released by operating and maintaining passage facilities and assist CTUIR in maintaining satellite facilities. |
| 9000501 | Umatilla Basin Natural Production M & E | Provide passage for adults and juveniles to and from natuaral production areas by maintaining and operating passage facilities |
| 8902401 | Umatilla River/WEID Screens M & E | Operate and maintain passage facilities. |
| 900050 | Umatilla Hatchery M & E | Maintain adult trapping facilities |
| 8802200 | Umatilla River Fish Passage Operations (submitted separately) | |
| 8902700 | Power Re-pay Umatilla Basin Project (submitted separately) | |
| 8343600 | Umatilla Passage Facilities O&M (subject proposal) | |
| Umatilla River Tributary Fish Passage |
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
| Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
|---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
| Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
|---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
| Item | Note | FY 2000 cost |
|---|---|---|
| Personnel | $237,132 | |
| Fringe | $82,996 | |
| Supplies | $92,220 | |
| Operating | $95,177 | |
| Travel | vehicle operation costs | $94,736 |
| Indirect | $90,545 | |
| Other | Training and Liability Ins. | $10,300 |
| $703,106 | ||
Total estimated budget
| Total FY 2000 cost | $703,106 |
| Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
| Total FY 2000 budget request | $703,106 |
| FY 2000 forecast from 1999 | $0 |
| % change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
| Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
|---|
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints: Funding of projects 8902700and 8443500 listed in Section 3 under umbrella proposals significantly affects the effort and effectiveness of the project. Multiyear funding requested.
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Comment:
Recommendation: Delay funding until a thorough evaluation of success to date is completed. This project should be evaluated together with projects 8802200 and 8902700.Comments: This proposal like some others is "operational in nature rather than research oriented". Therefore, "…specific data related to success of the project is limited." Neither is specific information provided on the facilities operated and maintained. The reviewer is referred to an annual report for that information. The result is that there is no basis for evaluating this proposal on its own. On the basis of the facts presented, it is not clear whether the fish passage facilities are located in stretches of river that are dewatered or in stretches of river that are bypassed by the truck and haul operation. Again, this argues for an umbrella project that would provide an evaluation of project success. This project is only necessary as part of a larger effort. If the larger effort is not achieving its objectives, there is no point in continuing this one.
Comment:
Comment:
Technical Criteria 1: Met? yes -Programmatic Criteria 2: Met? yes - O&M - na for these criteria.
Milestone Criteria 3: Met? yes -
Resource Criteria 4: Met? yes -
Comment:
Reduced duplication, increased focus and efficiency. Potential excessive costs were reduced. General reduction in the scope of the project. Evaluation may change after US v OR.Comment:
Fund existing operations. See programmatic recommendation for Umatilla and Walla Walla under project 8903500.Comment:
Comment:
[Decision made in 11-3-99 Council Meeting]; Address ISRP comments in BPA contractNW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
expense
May 2005
| FY05 NPCC start of year: | FY06 NPCC staff preliminary: | FY06 NPCC July draft start of year: |
| $492,405 | $492,405 | $492,405 |
Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website