FY 2000 proposal 199801003
Contents
Section 1. General administrative information
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Section 4. Budgets for planning/design phase
Section 5. Budgets for construction/implementation phase
Section 6. Budgets for operations/maintenance phase
Section 7. Budgets for monitoring/evaluation phase
Section 8. Budget summary
Reviews and Recommendations
Additional documents
Title | Type |
---|---|
199801003 Narrative | Narrative |
199801003 Sponsor Response to the ISRP | Response |
Section 1. Administrative
Proposal title | Spawning Distribution of Snake River Fall Chinook Salmon |
Proposal ID | 199801003 |
Organization | U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) |
Proposal contact person or principal investigator | |
Name | Aaron Garcia |
Mailing address | P.O. Box 18 Ahsahka, ID 83520 |
Phone / email | 2084767242 / [email protected] |
Manager authorizing this project | |
Review cycle | FY 2000 |
Province / Subbasin | Blue Mountain / Snake Lower |
Short description | Monitor the spawning distribution of fall chinook salmon to determine if supplemented yearling hatchery fish spawn where intended, and to document redd distribution and collect information on the spawning distribution of subyearling releases and natural f |
Target species | Snake River fall chinook salmon |
Project location
Latitude | Longitude | Description |
---|
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs)
Sponsor-reported:
RPA |
---|
Relevant RPAs based on NMFS/BPA review:
Reviewing agency | Action # | BiOp Agency | Description |
---|
Section 2. Past accomplishments
Year | Accomplishment |
---|---|
1997 | Installed telemetry tracking system. |
1997 | Tagged and tracked first returns from the first release of hatchery yearlings in the Snake River upriver of Lower Granite Dam. Found the telemetry tracking system worked as planned. |
1997 | Documented the spawning distribution of fall chinook salmon based on redd counts. |
1998 | Tagged, and are currently tracking, one- and two-ocean fall chinook salmon that were released as juveniles in the Snake and Clearwater rivers, upriver of Lower Granite Dam. These activities are progressing as scheduled. |
1998 | Redd searches are progressing as scheduled. |
Section 3. Relationships to other projects
Project ID | Title | Description |
---|---|---|
9204101 | Evaluate Adult Salmon and Steelhead Migration | Receive used radio tags from this project, and provide tracking data to this project |
9102900 | Life History of Fall Chinook in Columbia River Basin | Provide data on spawning locations and timing for use in this project |
9403400 | Assessing Summer/Fall Chinook Restoration in the Snake River Basin | Provide data on use of spawning habitat in the Snake River |
9406900 | Spawning Habitat Model for Snake River Fall Chinook | Provide data for comparisons between Snake and Columbia river fall chinook salmon habitat use |
9801004 | Monitoring and Evaluation of Yearling Snake River Fall Chinook | A subcomponent of this project. |
Section 4. Budget for Planning and Design phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Planning and Design phase
Section 5. Budget for Construction and Implementation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Construction and Implementation phase
Section 6. Budget for Operations and Maintenance phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Operations and Maintenance phase
Section 7. Budget for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Task-based budget
Objective | Task | Duration in FYs | Estimated 2000 cost | Subcontractor |
---|
Outyear objectives-based budget
Objective | Starting FY | Ending FY | Estimated cost |
---|
Outyear budgets for Monitoring and Evaluation phase
Section 8. Estimated budget summary
Itemized budget
Item | Note | FY 2000 cost |
---|---|---|
Personnel | $75,828 | |
Fringe | $21,665 | |
Supplies | Boat fuel/maintenance, Telemetry equipment. | $8,600 |
Operating | Helicopter flights/Vehicle leasing | $13,812 |
Travel | For field crews | $7,710 |
Indirect | $46,551 | |
Subcontractor | Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife | $8,500 |
$182,666 |
Total estimated budget
Total FY 2000 cost | $182,666 |
Amount anticipated from previously committed BPA funds | $0 |
Total FY 2000 budget request | $182,666 |
FY 2000 forecast from 1999 | $0 |
% change from forecast | 0.0% |
Cost sharing
Organization | Item or service provided | Amount | Cash or in-kind |
---|---|---|---|
U.S. Forest Service | Funding | $2,500 | unknown |
Idaho Power Company | Share in helicopter rental for redd searches. | $20,000 | unknown |
Other budget explanation
Schedule Constraints: Progress may be slowed due to low adult return rates.
Reviews and recommendations
This information was not provided on the original proposals, but was generated during the review process.
Fund in part for one year
Jun 15, 1999
Comment:
Recommendation: Fund in part for one year, at previous year's level. Future potential for a multi-year review cycle, but better description/interpretation of significance of past results, and long-term future strategy, would be required.Comments: This proposal is for year 4 (possibly 3 – this is confusing in the proposal) of a five-year project to evaluate a strategy for releasing yearling fall chinook salmon from Lyons Ferry Hatchery at three sites upriver of Lower Granite Dam, with the intent of enhancing natural production in the relevant reaches. The monitoring methods include radio-tagging, and redd searches. The objectives are well focused, and the methods appropriate, (however the panel voiced some concern about the emphasis on technical/operational targets at the expense of interpretation of past results. The proposal lacks a good summary of the work performed to date. Reviewers are concerned about the minimal effort being expended on dissemination of results. One publication for a five-year project of this magnitude is not adequate even thought he proposers state their intent to submit the "final report" to a professional fisheries journal. The budget in general appears to be appropriate for the scale of the project, however it is not clear why the large increase ($182k vs $125k) for FY 2000 vs FY 1999 is needed.
Comment:
Comment:
Technical Criteria 1: Met? yes -Programmatic Criteria 2: Met? no - Major critical assumption should be stated explicitly - see para.3 under Summary of major results. May not achieve sample size needed.
Milestone Criteria 3: Met? yes -
Resource Criteria 4: Met? yes -
Comment:
This project is needed, however, we recommend funding at a reduced rate to meet other management priorities in this region. This reduction could be absorbed by other cooperator's in this project. This project is covered under umbrella project #20541.Comment:
Fund. The responses adequately address the ISRP concerns.Comment:
Comment:
[Decision made in 11-3-99 Council Meeting]NW Power and Conservation Council's FY 2006 Project Funding Review
expense
May 2005
FY05 NPCC start of year: | FY06 NPCC staff preliminary: | FY06 NPCC July draft start of year: |
$52,000 | $52,000 | $52,000 |
Sponsor comments: See comment at Council's website